Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

IIA Exam IIA-CIA-Part3-3P Topic 12 Question 44 Discussion

Actual exam question for IIA's IIA-CIA-Part3-3P exam
Question #: 44
Topic #: 12
[All IIA-CIA-Part3-3P Questions]

The chief audit executive (CAE) has embraced a total quality management approach to improving the internal audit activity's (IAA's) processes. He would like to reduce the time to complete audits and improve client ratings of the IAA.

Which of the following staffing approaches is the CAE most likely to select?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Corazon
3 months ago
As a wise auditor once said, 'Audit like a team, not a dream team.' Option B seems to strike the right balance.
upvoted 0 times
Narcisa
1 months ago
In the end, it's all about finding the right balance between specialization and collaboration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Freida
1 months ago
True, but empowering team members to participate fully in key decisions can lead to more efficient audits.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mel
2 months ago
But assigning a single person to be responsible for each phase of the audit could also ensure accountability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leila
2 months ago
I agree, having a team with different specialties can bring diverse perspectives to the audit.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Marisha
3 months ago
I'm not sure the CAE wants to limit key decisions to senior staff. That could stifle innovation and ownership. Option B all the way!
upvoted 0 times
Tandra
2 months ago
Yeah, I think option B would definitely help improve client ratings and reduce audit completion time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brett
3 months ago
I agree, option B allows for more collaboration and input from team members.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lyndia
3 months ago
Haha, I'm not sure the CAE wants to turn the audits into a dictatorship with 'single person responsible' for each phase. Option B sounds much more dynamic and empowering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Skye
3 months ago
I see your points, but I think option C might be the most effective. Designating a single person for each phase of the audit could streamline the process and improve accountability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delbert
3 months ago
I agree, option B is the way to go. Diverse expertise and collaborative decision-making are crucial for a total quality management approach.
upvoted 0 times
Sheldon
2 months ago
Collaborative decision-making is key in total quality management, so option B is the most suitable staffing approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nina
2 months ago
Assigning a team with various specialties will definitely help improve client ratings and reduce audit completion time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenna
2 months ago
I agree, having different specialties on the team can lead to more comprehensive audits.
upvoted 0 times
...
Esteban
3 months ago
Option B is definitely the best choice. It allows for diverse expertise and empowers team members.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Svetlana
3 months ago
I disagree, I believe option B would be the best choice. Having a team with different specialties would bring diverse perspectives and lead to better decision making.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margurite
3 months ago
I think the CAE would choose option A because having a trained audit manager leading the team would ensure efficient planning and distribution of tasks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Latia
3 months ago
Assigning a team with different specialties and empowering them to participate in key decisions seems like the most effective approach to improve audit efficiency and client satisfaction.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel