Ah, the old 'nonconformance with the Standards' question. Classic! Well, if I had to guess, I'd say C is the way to go. Can't go wrong with the good old 'opportunities rather than risks' approach, right?
Haha, I'm betting the new internal auditor from the payroll department is going to have a rough time with that payroll audit! But in all seriousness, I think C is the right answer here.
User 2: I agree, it's not an easy transition. But I think C is the right answer for the circumstances when the final audit report should include a disclosure of nonconformance with the Standards.
Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. I guess C could be the answer, but I'm curious why the consulting engagements based on opportunities rather than risks would be a nonconformance. Isn't that just good practice?
I think the correct answer is C. The Standards require disclosure of any nonconformance with the Standards in the final audit report. Performing only one external assessment every five years or providing negative assurance doesn't seem like a nonconformance to me.
But what about when the internal auditor provides negative assurance because they found no evidence of misconduct? Shouldn't that also be disclosed in the final audit report?
I think the final audit report should include a disclosure of nonconformance with the Standards when there is a new internal auditor assigned to a task they are not qualified for.
upvoted 0 times
...
Log in to Pass4Success
Sign in:
Report Comment
Is the comment made by USERNAME spam or abusive?
Commenting
In order to participate in the comments you need to be logged-in.
You can sign-up or
login
Marva
2 months agoGeorgiann
2 months agoEdda
1 months agoCaprice
1 months agoArdella
1 months agoVincent
3 months agoFranchesca
1 months agoMerlyn
2 months agoLetha
2 months agoStephaine
3 months agoMerrilee
1 months agoVivan
1 months agoTarra
2 months agoDaren
2 months agoAlfreda
2 months agoCarman
2 months agoPaz
3 months agoMarvel
3 months agoVerda
4 months agoMalcolm
4 months agoNorah
4 months ago