Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

IIA Exam IIA-ACCA Topic 4 Question 77 Discussion

Actual exam question for IIA's IIA-ACCA exam
Question #: 77
Topic #: 4
[All IIA-ACCA Questions]

Which of the following activities is most likely to require a fraud specialist to supplement the knowledge and skills of the internal audit activity?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Denae
2 months ago
Employing audit tests to detect fraud is a job for a true detective! A fraud specialist would be the Sherlock Holmes of the internal audit team.
upvoted 0 times
Mertie
30 days ago
C) Interrogating a suspected fraudster.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlette
1 months ago
B) Employing audit tests to detect fraud.
upvoted 0 times
...
Oliva
1 months ago
A) Planning an engagement of the area in which fraud is suspected.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Fabiola
2 months ago
Completing a process review to improve controls seems straightforward enough. Why would you need a fraud specialist for that? Sounds like a waste of resources if you ask me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Josephine
3 months ago
Haha, I'm sure the suspected fraudster is just 'misunderstood' and didn't mean to embezzle all that money. Better call in a mind reader instead of a fraud specialist!
upvoted 0 times
Alonso
1 months ago
C) Interrogating a suspected fraudster.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delbert
1 months ago
B) Employing audit tests to detect fraud.
upvoted 0 times
...
Trinidad
2 months ago
A) Planning an engagement of the area in which fraud is suspected.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tamar
3 months ago
Interrogating a suspected fraudster requires special skills and knowledge that a typical internal auditor may not possess. A fraud specialist would be essential in this case.
upvoted 0 times
Shaquana
2 months ago
C) Interrogating a suspected fraudster.
upvoted 0 times
...
Desiree
2 months ago
B) Employing audit tests to detect fraud.
upvoted 0 times
...
Otis
2 months ago
A) Planning an engagement of the area in which fraud is suspected.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Albert
3 months ago
Planning an engagement where fraud is suspected seems like the most logical choice. You'll need a fraud specialist to provide guidance and expertise in this sensitive situation.
upvoted 0 times
Celestine
28 days ago
D) Completing a process review to improve controls to prevent fraud.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jolene
30 days ago
C) Interrogating a suspected fraudster.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimbery
1 months ago
B) Employing audit tests to detect fraud.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeannetta
1 months ago
A) Planning an engagement of the area in which fraud is suspected.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Vivienne
3 months ago
But wouldn't planning an engagement of the area in which fraud is suspected also require a fraud specialist to ensure all aspects are covered?
upvoted 0 times
...
Juan
3 months ago
I agree with Tanesha, because fraud specialists have the expertise in conducting interviews and detecting deception.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tanesha
3 months ago
I think interrogating a suspected fraudster would require a fraud specialist.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel