Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

ICMA Exam FMFQ Topic 3 Question 56 Discussion

Actual exam question for ICMA's FMFQ exam
Question #: 56
Topic #: 3
[All FMFQ Questions]

A company's share price fall below its net asset value. The company is then the subject of a takeover after which rather than being run as a going concern it is broken up and its assets sold to achieve maximum value. This is an example of which of the following strategies?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Nathan
4 days ago
This seems like a straightforward question about corporate strategies. I'm pretty confident I can identify the correct answer here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alva
5 days ago
This is a tricky one. I know Docker can handle microsegmentation and multi-tenancy, but the policy-based part is throwing me off. I'm going to have to guess on this one - maybe B?
upvoted 0 times
...
Glendora
8 days ago
Okay, let's see. The question says the messages are being sent by Service A, and the digital signatures confirm this. So the problem must be with Service A's own logic, not the third-party services. I'm leaning towards option C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emelda
5 months ago
Asset stripping, definitely. The company's being gutted and its parts sold off. Seems like a pretty ruthless strategy to me.
upvoted 0 times
Cristy
3 months ago
D) Leveraged buyout
upvoted 0 times
...
Jenifer
3 months ago
C) Mergers & Acquisitions
upvoted 0 times
...
Theron
4 months ago
B) Asset stripping
upvoted 0 times
...
Gianna
4 months ago
A) Leveraged investment
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lauryn
5 months ago
Asset stripping for sure. The company is being broken up and its assets sold off to the highest bidder. Not very friendly for the employees, I imagine.
upvoted 0 times
Ashton
3 months ago
Asset stripping can be quite ruthless, but it's all about maximizing value for the shareholders.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tarra
4 months ago
I agree, it's definitely not a friendly strategy for the employees. They are usually the ones who suffer the most in these situations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nadine
4 months ago
Yes, it does seem like asset stripping. The focus is on selling off the assets for maximum value.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dexter
5 months ago
This is a classic case of asset stripping. The company is being taken over and its assets sold off, rather than being kept running.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karan
5 months ago
I'd go with 'B' - asset stripping. The company is being broken up and its assets sold, rather than being kept as a going concern.
upvoted 0 times
Heidy
4 months ago
Asset stripping makes sense in this scenario, maximizing value through selling off assets.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vanda
4 months ago
Asset stripping makes sense in this scenario, maximizing value through selling off assets.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharen
4 months ago
Yeah, it definitely seems like the company is being dismantled for maximum value.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominga
4 months ago
Yeah, it definitely seems like the company is being dismantled for maximum value.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernadine
4 months ago
I think you're right, it does sound like asset stripping.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorothy
5 months ago
I think you're right, it does sound like asset stripping.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Roy
5 months ago
Asset stripping seems like the obvious choice here. The company's assets are being sold off to maximize value, rather than being run as a going concern.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yoko
6 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think it could also be D) Leveraged buyout. What do you guys think?
upvoted 0 times
...
Kanisha
6 months ago
I agree with Walton. Asset stripping makes sense in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Walton
6 months ago
I think the answer is B) Asset stripping.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel