Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

IBQH001 Exam - Topic 2 Question 93 Discussion

Posted by Nada on Jul 14, 2024 at 02:29 PM

One advantage to employees, rather than consultants, initiating change with the hospital is

Suggested Answer: A

Get Premium IBQH001 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
39 comments · newest first
LI
Lindsay 10 months ago
Higher in cost? That's a myth!
NO
Norah 11 months ago
Wait, are they really more objective?
TI
Tiera 11 months ago
Not sure about that, consultants can bring fresh perspectives.
GE
Georgene 11 months ago
Totally agree, employees know the ins and outs!
OL
Oliva 11 months ago
They have a greater knowledge about the hospital.
HE
Herminia 12 months ago
I remember discussing costs in class, and I think consultants are usually higher in cost. So, that might mean employees are a better option for initiating change.
FI
Filiberto 12 months ago
I feel like we practiced a question similar to this, and I think it was about objectivity. But I’m not convinced employees are always more objective.
MI
Mira 12 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about how employees might be part of the problem too. That could complicate things, right?
GI
Gilberto 1 year ago
I think one advantage of employees initiating change is that they have a greater knowledge about the hospital. It makes sense since they work there every day.
OL
Olive 1 year ago
Okay, I think I've got it. The key is to focus on the advantage of employees initiating change, which is that they're more objective than outside consultants. Option A seems like the right answer.
AN
Anisha 1 year ago
I'm a bit confused by the wording of the question. I'll read it over again and see if I can figure out the best approach.
TE
Tegan 1 year ago
I feel pretty confident about this. I think the answer is A - employees are more objective about the problem since they're already part of the organization.
RY
Ryan 1 year ago
Hmm, this is a tough one. I'm leaning towards option C, since employees may be part of the problem and less objective. But I'll double-check my reasoning.
OS
Osvaldo 1 year ago
I'm not sure about this one. The question seems a bit tricky, but I'll try to think it through carefully.
CA
Carma 1 year ago
I'm not entirely sure about this one. The options seem to be talking about both connections and threads, so I'll need to think carefully about which one best fits the information provided in the query.
CL
Claribel 1 year ago
I've got this! The fragment offset indicates where the fragment belongs in the original datagram, and since it's 13 bits, it must be a multiple of 2 bytes (or 4 bytes). I'll go with B.
MY
My 1 year ago
I think I practiced a question similar to this, and a bubble chart seemed to be the best choice given multiple dimensions like time and sales.
TW
Twila 1 year ago
I think the correct answer is D. Employees have a deeper understanding of the hospital, which could be a real advantage in initiating change. Plus, they're probably cheaper than consultants!
LI
Lisha 1 year ago
↳ replying to Twila
True, consultants can be expensive and may not have the same level of knowledge about the hospital.
ER
Ernest 1 year ago
↳ replying to Twila
Yeah, and they might be more invested in making the change successful.
VO
Vonda 1 year ago
↳ replying to Twila
I agree, employees definitely have a better understanding of the hospital.
LA
Lakeesha 1 year ago
Haha, I'm just imagining a consultant walking into the hospital, tripping over a loose tile, and then trying to charge the hospital a million dollars for their 'expertise.'
LA
Lavonna 1 year ago
Wow, this is a tough one. I'm leaning towards C, because sometimes employees can be part of the problem, and bringing in an outside perspective could be more effective.
ME
Melda 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lavonna
D) They have a greater knowledge about the hospital
BE
Berry 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lavonna
That's a good point, but I think A is more accurate. Employees might have a better understanding of the internal workings of the hospital.
GR
Gracia 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lavonna
C) They may be part of the problem
MA
Marylyn 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lavonna
A) They are more objective with regard to the problem
DE
Derick 2 years ago
I'm not sure I agree with that. Consultants might be more objective and able to see the bigger picture, which could be an advantage in initiating change.
EN
Enola 1 year ago
↳ replying to Derick
D) They have a greater knowledge about the hospital
MA
Margot 1 year ago
↳ replying to Derick
I'm not sure about that. Consultants might have a broader perspective and be more objective.
LI
Lina 1 year ago
↳ replying to Derick
That's true, employees might have a better understanding of the hospital's inner workings.
EL
Elvis 1 year ago
↳ replying to Derick
D) They have a greater knowledge about the hospital
JI
Jina 1 year ago
↳ replying to Derick
A) They are more objective with regard to the problem
FE
Fernanda 1 year ago
↳ replying to Derick
I think consultants might actually be more objective because they are not as emotionally invested.
ME
Meaghan 1 year ago
↳ replying to Derick
A) They are more objective with regard to the problem
DE
Desirae 2 years ago
I think D is the correct answer. Employees have a deeper understanding of the hospital's inner workings, which could make them better equipped to identify and address the problem.
NA
Nathan 2 years ago
True, but employees may also be more invested in finding a solution.
SK
Skye 2 years ago
But consultants might be more objective about the problem.
NA
Nathan 2 years ago
I think the advantage is that employees know the hospital better.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel