Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

IBM C1000-189 Exam - Topic 1 Question 18 Discussion

Posted by Billy on Jul 15, 2026 at 06:45 AM

Which order of precedence applies if a user is a member of multiple groups and the level of access is not the same?

Suggested Answer: C

According to IBM Instana documentation, access rights for users belonging to multiple groups are resolved by applying the most restrictive role. The documentation states: 'If a user belongs to more than one group, the permissions are set according to the order: No access > Limited access > Access all. If there's a conflict, 'No access' always takes precedence, followed by 'Limited access,' then 'Access all.'' This ensures that users do not gain unintended permissions due to overlapping group assignments and supports the principle of least privilege. This behavior is critical for security compliance and consistent access control, especially in regulated environments or where different teams have varying visibility requirements. By enforcing the strictest restriction, Instana reduces risk from misconfigurations and accidental escalation of privilege, and helps satisfy audit trail and governance requirements in enterprise use cases.


Get Premium C1000-189 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
12 comments · newest first
FE
Felicitas 1 month ago
I vote for D. Access all should always come first.
LO
Louann 1 month ago
I feel like A makes more sense. Limited access first.
CH
Chantay 1 month ago
I think it's B. Access all should take priority.
CR
Cristy 2 months ago
I agree with B, but I can see why some might think A.
CA
Carline 2 months ago
Wait, is it really B? That seems off.
RE
Rebbecca 2 months ago
B makes the most sense to me.
LO
Lorean 2 months ago
I thought it was A) Limited access, No access, Access all?
GA
Gabriele 2 months ago
It's definitely B) Access all, Limited access, No access.
JO
Jovita 2 months ago
I thought it was D, but now I'm second-guessing myself. I need to recall how we discussed group memberships affecting access levels.
AL
Alonzo 3 months ago
I'm a bit unsure, but I think it might be C. I remember something about "no access" being prioritized over "limited access."
BR
Brendan 3 months ago
I feel like we practiced a similar question in class, and I want to say it was about prioritizing access levels. Maybe it's B?
NU
Nu 3 months ago
I think the order of precedence is important, but I can't remember if it's based on the most restrictive or the least restrictive access.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel