Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

IBM Exam C1000-150 Topic 8 Question 32 Discussion

Actual exam question for IBM's C1000-150 exam
Question #: 32
Topic #: 8
[All C1000-150 Questions]

To limit and secure integrations with an external service, which method is used to establish a trusted relationship between the Cloud Pak for Business Automation capability on OpenShift with the external service?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

When setting up a demo environment an identity provider may not be known. In this case, htpasswd can be used to replace the default admin user with a simple identity provider. Htpasswd is an Apache utility for creating and updating user authentication files for the Apache web server. It uses a combination of plaintext passwords and a hashing algorithm to store its credentials.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Verlene
22 days ago
I'm going with option C. It's the most secure and automated approach to managing the trusted certificates. Plus, it avoids the potential headaches of the other options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kaycee
24 days ago
Ha! Copying the certificate to a specific pod? That's like trying to secure your house by hiding the key under the doormat. Option C is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
Antione
2 days ago
Option C is definitely the best way to establish a trusted relationship with the external service.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Claribel
1 months ago
Option A makes sense, but it would require the external service provider to be involved in the setup process. Option C looks more straightforward and self-contained.
upvoted 0 times
Krystina
19 days ago
A) Provide the Cloud Pak for Business Automation operator root CA signer certificate to the external service provider to be configured
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Isidra
2 months ago
That makes sense too, we need to establish a trusted relationship between the Cloud Pak for Business Automation capability and the external service.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melvin
2 months ago
I'm not sure about option B. Prompting the end user to manage the certificate locally doesn't sound like a scalable solution for enterprise-level deployments.
upvoted 0 times
Jolanda
22 days ago
Option C might be a better choice for establishing a trusted relationship with the external service.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jolanda
30 days ago
I agree, option B doesn't seem like the best approach for scalability.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rhea
2 months ago
Option C seems like the correct way to establish a trusted relationship. It's a more secure approach than just copying the certificate to a specific pod.
upvoted 0 times
Skye
5 days ago
Copying the certificate to a specific pod seems risky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zona
6 days ago
Storing a local copy of the certificate might not be the best practice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deeanna
12 days ago
I think providing the root CA signer certificate is also a good option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erick
22 days ago
I agree, option C is the most secure method.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Clement
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is A. We should provide the Cloud Pak for Business Automation operator root CA signer certificate to the external service provider.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isidra
2 months ago
I think the answer is C, because we need to generate a generic secret with the external TLS certificate.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel