Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

IBM Exam C1000-143 Topic 8 Question 43 Discussion

Actual exam question for IBM's C1000-143 exam
Question #: 43
Topic #: 8
[All C1000-143 Questions]

How are on-premises components of Event Manager's OMNIbus kept alive?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Danilo
3 months ago
I heard the correct answer involves a secret handshake and a vial of unicorn tears. But I'm probably just joking around too much.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carey
3 months ago
D? Failover and failback? That sounds like overkill for keeping a few on-premises components alive. I think the developers of Event Manager have a better solution than that.
upvoted 0 times
Karan
2 months ago
D) Using failover and fail back
upvoted 0 times
...
Daryl
2 months ago
C) Using the Process Agent
upvoted 0 times
...
Artie
2 months ago
B) Using the self-monitoring capabilities of Event Manager
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonio
2 months ago
A) Using a crontab job
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tambra
3 months ago
Hmm, I'm torn between B and C. Maybe I should flip a coin? Oh wait, that's not a valid exam strategy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barb
3 months ago
I'm going with C. The Process Agent is designed to monitor and manage the processes, so it makes sense that it would be used to keep the on-premises components alive.
upvoted 0 times
Kara
1 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think the self-monitoring capabilities of Event Manager could also play a role in keeping the components alive.
upvoted 0 times
...
Florencia
1 months ago
I think using failover and fail back could also be a good option to ensure high availability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Page
2 months ago
I agree, the Process Agent is specifically designed for managing processes.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cristina
4 months ago
I think the answer is B. Event Manager has built-in self-monitoring capabilities to keep its on-premises components alive. That's the most reliable approach.
upvoted 0 times
Lachelle
2 months ago
I'm not sure about using a crontab job, it seems like the other options are more efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keneth
2 months ago
The Process Agent might work as well, but I believe self-monitoring is more reliable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherelle
2 months ago
I think failover and fail back could also be a good way to keep the on-premises components alive.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dyan
2 months ago
I agree, using the self-monitoring capabilities of Event Manager is the best option.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Coletta
4 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think it could also be using the self-monitoring capabilities of Event Manager.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noe
4 months ago
I agree with Chandra, failover and fail back is a reliable way to ensure the components stay alive.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chandra
4 months ago
I think the on-premises components are kept alive using failover and fail back.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel