Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

IBM C1000-138 Exam - Topic 4 Question 16 Discussion

Posted by Elina on Jan 23, 2025 at 04:19 PM

Within the client security policy, the credential extraction method is set to Form.

Which statement is a requirement in this case?

Suggested Answer: A

In IBM API Connect v10.0.3, it is possible to link the same API and version inside different Products. This flexibility allows an API to be offered under multiple Products, each potentially having different plans, pricing, or rate limits, depending on the business needs.

Other options are incorrect:

Option B: Linking the same Product and version inside different APIs does not apply.

Option C: Plans are linked to Products, not directly to APIs.

Option D: Linking the same Product and version multiple times in the same space is not allowed.


IBM API Connect v10.0.3 Documentation: Managing APIs and Products

Get Premium C1000-138 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
34 comments · newest first
JU
Justine 11 months ago
Not sure about that, seems a bit too specific.
DO
Dorsey 11 months ago
Totally agree, POST request is a must for client id and secret!
JO
Joesph 11 months ago
Wait, do credentials really need a custom form?
GE
Georgeanna 11 months ago
I thought 'Stop on error' was optional?
MO
Mozell 12 months ago
A prefix will be added to the secret-name and id at runtime.
VE
Verda 12 months ago
I vaguely remember something about prefixes being added at runtime, so option C could be correct, but I’m not completely confident.
AL
Allene 12 months ago
I’m leaning towards option D because I think POST requests are commonly used for sending credentials, but I need to double-check that.
MA
Marcelle 1 year ago
I remember practicing a question about credential extraction methods, and I feel like 'Stop on error' might be important, but I can't recall the exact details.
SU
Suzi 1 year ago
I think option B sounds familiar, but I'm not entirely sure if a custom form is always required for credential extraction.
AN
Angelyn 1 year ago
This seems straightforward enough. I'll review the options and go with the one that best matches the requirement for the credential extraction method being set to Form.
AR
Arthur 1 year ago
I think I've got a good handle on this. The key is to focus on the specific requirement mentioned in the question, rather than getting caught up in the other details.
EM
Emilio 1 year ago
I'm a bit confused by the wording of the options. I'll need to make sure I understand exactly what each one is asking before I can confidently select an answer.
DA
Daren 1 year ago
Okay, let's see here. The question is asking about a requirement in this case, so I'll need to focus on that and not get distracted by the other details.
BO
Bobbye 1 year ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully read through the options and think about the requirements for the credential extraction method being set to Form.
VA
Valda 1 year ago
Custom forms, prefixes, and POST requests - it's like a secret spy mission! I wonder if there's a hidden camera somewhere watching us take this exam.
AL
Alaine 1 year ago
↳ replying to Valda
D) Client id and secret must be supplied via a POST request.
OL
Olene 1 year ago
↳ replying to Valda
C) A prefix will be added to the secret-name and id at runtime.
LA
Lashawnda 1 year ago
↳ replying to Valda
B) Credentials have to be gathered via a custom form.
MA
Magdalene 1 year ago
↳ replying to Valda
A) \'Stop on error\' has to be active as well.
VE
Velda 1 year ago
Stop on error? Nah, I prefer the 'keep calm and carry on' approach. Option A is a bit too paranoid for my liking.
EV
Eveline 1 year ago
A POST request for the client id and secret? That's basic stuff, no need to overthink it. Option D is the way to go.
DA
Daren 1 year ago
Wait, a prefix will be added to the secret-name and id at runtime? That's news to me. I'll have to double-check the documentation on that one.
TE
Tequila 1 year ago
↳ replying to Daren
We should definitely review the documentation to confirm.
MI
Mitzie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Daren
I believe it's option B) Credentials have to be gathered via a custom form.
CH
Chandra 1 year ago
↳ replying to Daren
Yes, it adds an extra layer of protection to the credentials.
GW
Gwen 1 year ago
↳ replying to Daren
I think the prefix being added at runtime is a security measure.
LO
Louisa 1 year ago
↳ replying to Daren
I'm not sure, but I think it might be option A) 'Stop on error' has to be active as well.
MA
Marguerita 1 year ago
↳ replying to Daren
I think it's option C) A prefix will be added to the secret-name and id at runtime.
AN
Andra 2 years ago
Hmm, 'Form' credential extraction method, that means we need to gather the credentials via a custom form. Option B seems to be the correct answer here.
TA
Taryn 1 year ago
↳ replying to Andra
Yes, we definitely need to gather the credentials via a custom form for the 'Form' credential extraction method.
BR
Brittni 1 year ago
↳ replying to Andra
I agree, option B is the requirement in this case.
JE
Jesus 2 years ago
But wouldn't it make more sense to use a custom form for credential extraction?
NO
Novella 2 years ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is D) Client id and secret must be supplied via a POST request.
JE
Jesus 2 years ago
I think the answer is B) Credentials have to be gathered via a custom form.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel