Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

IBM Exam C1000-132 Topic 2 Question 28 Discussion

Actual exam question for IBM's C1000-132 exam
Question #: 28
Topic #: 2
[All C1000-132 Questions]

Which statement is true regarding Master Preventative Maintenance (PM) records?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Abel
24 days ago
Wait, is the correct answer 'All of the above'? Because that's usually how these trick questions work, right? *chuckles* Nah, just kidding. I'm going with B, it's the only one that sounds logical to me.
upvoted 0 times
Olive
4 days ago
User 1: I think the correct answer is B, it makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ernestine
28 days ago
I'm leaning towards B as well. It just makes sense that the associated PM records can be created for the Master PM, regardless of whether it has a specific asset attached. Gotta love these maintenance questions, they really make you think!
upvoted 0 times
...
Mammie
1 months ago
C can't be right, 90 days seems way too short for PM records. Those should stick around for at least a year, if not longer. Maybe they're trying to trick us with that one.
upvoted 0 times
Ona
18 hours ago
That makes sense, they probably are trying to trick us with the 90 days expiration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucy
14 days ago
I think the correct answer is B) Associated PM records can be created for a Master PM which does not have an item.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elena
28 days ago
I agree, 90 days does seem too short for PM records.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Shad
1 months ago
Hmm, I was going to say D, but now I'm second-guessing myself. I thought the associated records could only be tied to the asset location, not the asset itself. This is a tricky one!
upvoted 0 times
...
Eden
2 months ago
I'm pretty sure it's B. The question says 'Master Preventative Maintenance (PM) records', so the associated PM records should be able to be created for the Master PM itself, even if it doesn't have a specific asset attached to it.
upvoted 0 times
Jacqueline
28 days ago
Yeah, I agree. It makes sense that you can create associated PM records for a Master PM without a specific item.
upvoted 0 times
...
Regenia
29 days ago
I think you're right, B sounds like the correct option.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Laquita
2 months ago
Hmm, that's interesting. Can you explain why you think that is the correct answer?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeffrey
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is A) Associated PM records can only be created for a rotating item's asset.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laquita
2 months ago
I think the answer is B) Associated PM records can be created for a Master PM which does not have an item.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel