Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

IAPP CIPT Exam - Topic 3 Question 88 Discussion

Actual exam question for IAPP's CIPT exam
Question #: 88
Topic #: 3
[All CIPT Questions]

SCENARIO

Please use the following to answer the next question:

Chuck, a compliance auditor for a consulting firm focusing on healthcare clients, was required to travel to the client's office to perform an onsite review of the client's operations. He rented a car from Finley Motors upon arrival at the airport as so he could commute to and from the client's office. The car rental agreement was electronically signed by Chuck and included his name, address, driver's license, make/model of the car, billing rate, and additional details describing the rental transaction. On the second night, Chuck was caught by a red light camera not stopping at an intersection on his way to dinner. Chuck returned the car back to the car rental agency at the end week without mentioning the infraction and Finley Motors emailed a copy of the final receipt to the address on file.

Local law enforcement later reviewed the red light camera footage. As Finley Motors is the registered owner of the car, a notice was sent to them indicating the infraction and fine incurred. This notice included the license plate number, occurrence date and time, a photograph of the driver, and a web portal link to a video clip of the violation for further review. Finley Motors, however, was not responsible for the violation as they were not driving the car at the time and transferred the incident to AMP Payment Resources for further review. AMP Payment Resources identified Chuck as the driver based on the rental agreement he signed when picking up the car and then contacted Chuck directly through a written letter regarding the infraction to collect the fine.

After reviewing the incident through the AMP Payment Resources' web portal, Chuck paid the fine using his personal credit card. Two weeks later, Finley Motors sent Chuck an email promotion offering 10% off a future rental.

What should Finley Motors have done to incorporate the transparency principle of Privacy by Design (PbD)?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

referential integrity does not contribute to keeping the data confidential.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Brock
4 months ago
I thought verbal consent was enough, but maybe not?
upvoted 0 times
...
Maile
4 months ago
A signed data sharing agreement would’ve been smart.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlena
4 months ago
Wait, did Chuck even know they could share his info?
upvoted 0 times
...
Skye
4 months ago
Totally agree, transparency is key!
upvoted 0 times
...
Eleonore
4 months ago
They should've included data sharing info in the rental agreement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catarina
5 months ago
I think option A might be a bit off because a data sharing agreement seems more relevant for ongoing partnerships rather than a one-time incident like this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ilene
5 months ago
I practiced a similar question where consent was a big factor. I wonder if option C is too much to ask for in this scenario, though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Markus
5 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like option B could be relevant too. They need to show they had a legitimate interest, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Audrie
5 months ago
I remember discussing the importance of transparency in data sharing during our Privacy by Design module. I think option D makes sense since it relates directly to the rental agreement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Veda
5 months ago
This is a tricky one. I'm not totally sure what the "transparency principle of Privacy by Design" means, to be honest. I'll need to do a quick review of that concept before I can confidently select the best answer here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adolph
5 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. Based on the scenario, Finley Motors should have provided notice of their data sharing practices in the rental agreement that Chuck signed. That would align with the transparency principle of Privacy by Design. The other options don't seem as relevant here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maurine
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused on this one. There are a few options that seem plausible, like getting consent or providing notice in the rental agreement. I'll need to re-read the scenario carefully to make sure I understand all the details before deciding.
upvoted 0 times
...
Winfred
5 months ago
This question seems straightforward - it's asking about the transparency principle of Privacy by Design and what Finley Motors should have done. I think the key is to focus on the information sharing that occurred between Finley Motors and AMP Payment Resources.
upvoted 0 times
...
Timmy
6 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about vibration-induced fatigue. I'll focus on understanding the key factors mentioned and try to logically deduce the missing component.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jutta
10 months ago
I'm gonna go with D. Transparency is key, and the rental agreement is the perfect place to disclose that kind of information.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jess
10 months ago
Ha! Finley Motors should have just let Chuck know they'd be sharing his info. No need to overcomplicate things.
upvoted 0 times
Laurel
9 months ago
Definitely, it's important to keep customers informed about how their information is being shared.
upvoted 0 times
...
Odette
9 months ago
Yeah, transparency is key in situations like this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Steffanie
9 months ago
Chuck should have been informed about the data sharing with AMP Payment Resources.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mari
10 months ago
I'm not sure, but C seems a bit excessive. Verbal consent is overkill for this type of situation.
upvoted 0 times
Maynard
9 months ago
I agree, B seems like the most appropriate option in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheldon
9 months ago
B) Documented that Finley Motors has a legitimate interest to share Chuck's information.
upvoted 0 times
...
Audry
9 months ago
A) Signed a data sharing agreement with AMP Payment Resources.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Deandrea
11 months ago
I'm leaning towards B. Finley Motors has a legitimate interest in sharing the driver's information to resolve the traffic violation.
upvoted 0 times
Antonio
10 months ago
A) Signed a data sharing agreement with AMP Payment Resources.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherelle
10 months ago
C) Obtained verbal consent from Chuck and recorded it within internal systems.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isaac
10 months ago
B) Documented that Finley Motors has a legitimate interest to share Chuck's information.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Phyliss
11 months ago
I think obtaining verbal consent from Chuck and recording it within internal systems would have been a better approach to incorporate the transparency principle of Privacy by Design.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edgar
11 months ago
Hmm, I think D is the correct answer here. The rental agreement should have provided clear notice to Chuck about Finley Motors' data sharing practices.
upvoted 0 times
Annelle
10 months ago
Yes, providing notice in the rental agreement would have been the best way to incorporate Privacy by Design.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lindy
10 months ago
It's important for companies to be transparent about how they handle customer data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leatha
10 months ago
Chuck should have been informed about data sharing in the rental agreement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deandrea
10 months ago
I agree, D seems like the best option to ensure transparency.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Selma
11 months ago
I agree with Kaycee. It would have been more transparent if Chuck was informed about the data sharing practices upfront.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kaycee
11 months ago
I think Finley Motors should have provided notice of data sharing practices within the electronically signed rental agreement.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel