Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

IAPP CIPT Exam - Topic 2 Question 56 Discussion

Which of the following CANNOT be effectively determined during a code audit?
D) Whether the differential privacy implementation correctly anonymizes data.
A) Whether access control logic is recommended in all cases.
B) Whether data is being incorrectly shared with a third-party.
C) Whether consent is durably recorded in the case of a server crash.

IAPP CIPT Exam - Topic 2 Question 56 Discussion

Actual exam question for IAPP's CIPT exam
Question #: 56
Topic #: 2
[All CIPT Questions]

Which of the following CANNOT be effectively determined during a code audit?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Sharee at Sep 20, 2022, 11:36 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CIPT Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Floyd
10 months ago
I'm surprised C is even an option, seems like it should be trackable!
upvoted 0 times
...
Tandra
11 months ago
Wait, can we really not check if data is shared incorrectly?
upvoted 0 times
...
Celeste
11 months ago
Totally agree, A is subjective and can't be determined.
upvoted 0 times
...
Julie
11 months ago
I think D can be verified, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Alpha
11 months ago
C is tricky, can't really check that during an audit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Justa
11 months ago
I’m leaning towards C too, but I wonder if there’s a way to check for consent records even after a crash. It feels like a gray area in audits.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lon
11 months ago
I feel like option D could also be tricky. We can check if differential privacy is implemented, but how do we know if it actually anonymizes data effectively?
upvoted 0 times
...
Irma
11 months ago
I remember a practice question about access control logic, and it was clear that audits can assess that. So, I don't think A is the answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Herschel
11 months ago
I think option C might be the right answer, but I'm not entirely sure. It seems like a server crash would make it hard to verify consent records.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daniel
12 months ago
Okay, I think I've got a good handle on this. I'll need to identify the skill gaps and then determine which team member would be the best fit for the training course based on their current skills.
upvoted 0 times
...
Golda
12 months ago
Enabling auto sign-on for the user's IP address? I'm not sure that would fix the problem here. Seems like a bit of a stretch.
upvoted 0 times
...
Muriel
12 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The options seem similar, so I'll need to read them carefully to determine the key feature.
upvoted 0 times
...
Phil
12 months ago
This question seems pretty straightforward. I think the key is understanding how Defenders behave when the Console is unreachable during upgrades.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ryann
12 months ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to think carefully about the relationships between the tables and the options presented.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilda
1 year ago
If the code audit can't determine whether the privacy implementation is working, I guess the auditors are just going to have to 'anonymize' the results. *wink wink*
upvoted 0 times
...
Marge
1 year ago
D seems like the obvious choice here. Evaluating the implementation of differential privacy is a complex task that goes beyond a typical code audit.
upvoted 0 times
Gracia
1 year ago
C) Whether consent is durably recorded in the case of a server crash.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rozella
1 year ago
B) Whether data is being incorrectly shared with a third-party.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hershel
1 year ago
A) Whether access control logic is recommended in all cases.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Georgeanna
1 year ago
Haha, I bet the developers wish they could just 'crash the server' to avoid that pesky consent issue. C must be the right answer!
upvoted 0 times
Elvera
1 year ago
Definitely, consent needs to be recorded properly even in case of a server crash. It's a crucial aspect of data privacy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rex
1 year ago
Yeah, crashing the server wouldn't solve that problem. It's important to have a backup plan.
upvoted 0 times
...
Salome
1 year ago
I think C is the right answer too. It's tricky to ensure consent is durably recorded.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Emmanuel
1 year ago
I think B is the right answer. Verifying whether data is being shared correctly with third-parties is a key part of a code audit.
upvoted 0 times
Francisca
1 year ago
B) Whether data is being incorrectly shared with a third-party.
upvoted 0 times
...
Venita
1 year ago
A) Whether access control logic is recommended in all cases.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Desiree
1 year ago
I'm pretty sure the correct answer is A. Access control logic is a crucial part of a code audit, so that can't be effectively determined during one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonio
1 year ago
But consent being durably recorded is crucial for data privacy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maynard
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonio
1 year ago
I think the answer is C.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel