Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

IAPP CIPP/US Exam - Topic 6 Question 49 Discussion

In 2011, the FTC announced a settlement with Google regarding its social networking service Google Buzz. The FTC alleged that in the process of launching the service, the company did all of the following EXCEPT?
D) Failed to employ sufficient security safeguards.
A) Violated its own privacy policies.
B) Engaged in deceptive trade practices.
C) Failed to comply with Safe Harbor principles.

IAPP CIPP/US Exam - Topic 6 Question 49 Discussion

Actual exam question for IAPP's CIPP/US exam
Question #: 49
Topic #: 6
[All CIPP/US Questions]

In 2011, the FTC announced a settlement with Google regarding its social networking service Google Buzz. The FTC alleged that in the process of launching the service, the company did all of the following EXCEPT?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2011/03/ftc-charges-deceptive-privacy-practices-googles-rollout-its-buzz-social-network


by Danica at Nov 21, 2023, 02:01 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CIPP/US Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Mary
10 months ago
I thought they had good security measures, guess I was wrong!
upvoted 0 times
...
Vivan
10 months ago
Totally agree, deceptive trade practices were a big issue there.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lemuel
10 months ago
Wait, did they really not comply with Safe Harbor? That seems off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amos
10 months ago
Definitely violated privacy policies, no doubt about it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elden
11 months ago
I remember the Google Buzz fiasco, it was a mess!
upvoted 0 times
...
Jina
11 months ago
I have a vague memory of the case, but I’m uncertain if "engaged in deceptive trade practices" was one of the allegations. It could be a trick option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Moon
11 months ago
This question feels familiar; I practiced a similar one about privacy violations in tech companies. I think "failed to employ sufficient security safeguards" might be the answer here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gayla
11 months ago
I think they definitely violated their own privacy policies, but I can't recall if the Safe Harbor principles were part of the settlement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ma
11 months ago
I remember reading about the FTC's actions against Google Buzz, but I'm not sure which specific allegation they didn't make.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nikita
11 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the wording of the question. It's asking what the FTC alleged Google did NOT do, right? I'll need to re-read the options carefully to make sure I don't miss anything.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pete
11 months ago
I'm feeling confident about this one. The key is to focus on what the FTC said Google did NOT do, which was fail to employ sufficient security safeguards. That's the answer that stands out to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marla
11 months ago
Okay, let me see. The FTC alleged that Google violated its own privacy policies, engaged in deceptive practices, and failed to comply with Safe Harbor principles. So the answer must be that they did employ sufficient security safeguards.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lai
11 months ago
This question seems pretty straightforward. I think I can eliminate a few options and then make an educated guess.
upvoted 0 times
...
Minna
12 months ago
Hmm, I'm a little unsure about this one. I'll need to think through the details of the Google Buzz case to figure out which option doesn't fit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lindsay
12 months ago
This looks like a pretty straightforward question. I'd probably go with option A - deploying the Pub/Sub and Cloud Run emulators locally and testing with mock data. That way I can isolate the application and really dig into the logs to find the root cause.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rozella
12 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think carefully about the trade-offs between the different options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacquelyne
12 months ago
I feel like I've seen something about using USB drives for panel configurations, but I'm not entirely sure if that's a common method or not.
upvoted 0 times
...
Solange
12 months ago
I have a vague memory of XGBoost being mentioned in our lessons... maybe option C could be a good choice since it uses that built-in model?
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel