Discuss IAPP CIPP/US Exam Topic 5 Question 88

What was the original purpose of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act?

ATo further define what information can reasonably be under surveillance in public places under the USA PATRIOT Act, such as Internet access in public libraries.

BTo further clarify a reasonable expectation of privacy stemming from the Katz v. United States decision.

CTo further define a framework for authorizing wiretaps by the executive branch for national security purposes under Article II of the Constitution.

DTo further clarify when a warrant is not required for a wiretap performed internally by the telephone company outside the suspect's home, stemming from the Olmstead v. United States decision.

Suggested Answer: C

The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) was enacted in 1978 in response to revelations of widespread privacy violations by the federal government under President Nixon.It established procedures for requesting judicial authorization for electronic surveillance and physical search of persons engaged in espionage or international terrorism against the United States on behalf of a foreign power1The original purpose of FISA was to further define a framework for authorizing wiretaps by the executive branch for national security purposes under Article II of the Constitution, which grants the president the power to conduct foreign affairs and defend the nation23FISA was intended to balance the need for collecting foreign intelligence information with the protection of privacy and civil liberties of U.S.persons4Reference: https://www.intelligence.gov/foreign-intelligence-surveillance-act

https://www.intelligence.gov/foreign-intelligence-surveillance-act/1234-categories-of-fisa

Get Premium CIPP/US Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test

26 comments · newest first

Freeman 6 months ago

But C is more about the framework. It’s crucial for the executive branch.

Torie 6 months ago

I'm not sure. B sounds good too, privacy is key.

Therese 6 months ago

I agree, C seems right. It’s about wiretaps for security.

Glory 6 months ago

I think it's C. It makes sense for national security.

Dorothea 7 months ago

Huh, I didn’t know it was tied to the Constitution like that!

Mona 7 months ago

Totally agree, it’s all about national security!

Lelia 7 months ago

Wait, I thought it was just about public surveillance!

Margery 7 months ago

I think it was more about privacy expectations, right?

Mira 7 months ago

It was mainly about authorizing wiretaps for national security.

Felicitas 7 months ago

C is the correct answer. The FISA established a process for the executive branch to get approval for national security wiretaps.

Frederic 8 months ago

The FISA was created so the government could spy on us without our knowledge. Big Brother is watching!

Truman 8 months ago

I'm going with B. The FISA was about clarifying privacy rights after the Katz decision. Or was it...?

Arlean 9 months ago

Definitely C. The FISA was all about giving the government more power to spy on people. What could go wrong?

Filiberto 9 months ago

I think the answer is C. The FISA was meant to provide a framework for the executive branch to conduct wiretaps for national security purposes.

Mee 9 months ago

I keep mixing up the details from Olmstead and Katz cases. I wonder if option D could be relevant, but it feels off for FISA.

Monroe 9 months ago

I practiced a question similar to this, and I think FISA was more about national security and wiretaps, which makes me think option C is correct.

Gregoria 9 months ago

I remember something about Katz v. United States and privacy expectations, but I can't recall if that directly relates to FISA. Maybe option B?

Jaclyn 9 months ago

I think the FISA was mainly about establishing a framework for wiretaps, so I might lean towards option C, but I'm not entirely sure.

Maurine 10 months ago

This is a tricky one. I'll need to review my notes on the FISA Act and the relevant court cases to make sure I pick the right answer. C seems like the best option, but I want to double-check.

German 10 months ago

I'm not totally sure, but I think the FISA Act was trying to address some of the issues raised in the Katz v. United States case, so I'll consider B as a possibility.

Antonio 10 months ago

Okay, I remember learning about this in class. The FISA Act was meant to clarify the rules around wiretapping and surveillance for national security, so I'm pretty confident C is the right answer.

Elbert 10 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit confused on the details here. I'll need to think through the key court cases and how they relate to the FISA Act.

Beth 10 months ago

I think the original purpose was to establish a framework for authorizing wiretaps for national security purposes, so I'll go with C.

Ettie 4 months ago

↳ replying to Beth

Definitely C! It set the stage for modern surveillance.

Shonda 4 months ago

↳ replying to Beth

Yeah, national security was a big deal back then.

Lynette 6 months ago

↳ replying to Beth

I agree, C makes the most sense.

IAPP CIPP/US Exam - Topic 5 Question 88 Discussion