New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

IAPP CIPP/US Exam - Topic 4 Question 72 Discussion

Actual exam question for IAPP's CIPP/US exam
Question #: 72
Topic #: 4
[All CIPP/US Questions]

SCENARIO

Please use the following to answer the next QUESTION:

Matt went into his son's bedroom one evening and found him stretched out on his bed typing on his laptop. ''Doing your network?'' Matt asked hopefully.

''No,'' the boy said. ''I'm filling out a survey.''

Matt looked over his son's shoulder at his computer screen. ''What kind of survey?'' ''It's asking Questions about my opinions.''

''Let me see,'' Matt said, and began reading the list of Questions that his son had already answered. ''It's asking your opinions about the government and citizenship. That's a little odd. You're only ten.''

Matt wondered how the web link to the survey had ended up in his son's email inbox. Thinking the message might have been sent to his son by mistake he opened it and read it. It had come from an entity called the Leadership Project, and the content and the graphics indicated that it was intended for children. As Matt read further he learned that kids who took the survey were automatically registered in a contest to win the first book in a series about famous leaders.

To Matt, this clearly seemed like a marketing ploy to solicit goods and services to children. He asked his son if he had been prompted to give information about himself in order to take the survey. His son told him he had been asked to give his name, address, telephone number, and date of birth, and to answer Questions about his favorite games and toys.

Matt was concerned. He doubted if it was legal for the marketer to collect information from his son in the way that it was. Then he noticed several other commercial emails from marketers advertising products for children in his son's inbox, and he decided it was time to report the incident to the proper authorities.

Based on the incident, the FTC's enforcement actions against the marketer would most likely include what violation?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Nevada's privacy law, Senate Bill 260 (SB 260), is an amendment to the existing Nevada Revised Statutes (NRS) Chapter 603A that was enacted in June 2021 and will take effect on October 1, 2021. SB 260 expands the scope and definition of ''covered information'' under NRS 603A to include any information that identifies, relates to, describes, or is capable of being associated with a consumer, such as name, address, email, phone number, social security number, biometric data, geolocation data, and online identifiers. SB 260 also grants Nevada consumers the right to opt out of the sale of their covered information by an operator of a website or online service that collects and maintains such information.

Under SB 260, an operator is defined as a person who owns or operates a website or online service for commercial purposes, collects and maintains covered information from consumers who reside in Nevada and use or visit the website or online service, and purposefully directs its activities toward Nevada. A sale is defined as the exchange of covered information for monetary consideration by the operator to a person for the person to license or sell the covered information to additional persons. However, there are some exceptions to the definition of a sale, such as:

If the consumer has consented to the sale after being provided with clear and conspicuous notice of the sale and the opportunity to opt out.

If the sale is to a person who processes the covered information on behalf of the operator.

If the sale is to a person with whom the consumer has a direct relationship for the purposes of providing a product or service requested by the consumer.

If the sale is to a person for purposes that are consistent with the reasonable expectations of the consumer considering the context in which the consumer provided the covered information to the operator.

If the sale is to a person who is an affiliate of the operator.

If the sale is to a person as an asset that is part of a merger, acquisition, bankruptcy, or other transaction in which the person assumes control of all or part of the operator's assets.

To comply with SB 260, an operator that sells covered information must provide a designated request address through which a consumer may submit a verified request to opt out of the sale. The designated request address may be an email address, a toll-free telephone number, or an Internet website. The operator must respond to the verified request within 60 days, and may extend the response period for an additional 30 days if reasonably necessary. The operator must also provide a notice to the consumer that identifies the categories of covered information that the operator collects and the categories of third parties to whom the operator may disclose the covered information.

Therefore, the best privacy compliance step for SuperMart to comply with SB 260 is to provide a mechanism for consumers to opt out of sales, as this is the core requirement of the law. Option A is the correct answer.

Option B is incorrect, as SB 260 does not grant consumers the right to access or delete their covered information, unlike other state privacy laws such as the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) or the Virginia Consumer Data Protection Act (VCDPA).

Option C is incorrect, as SB 260 does not require operators to provide a notice of financial incentive for any loyalty programs offered to their customers, unlike the CCPA.

Option D is incorrect, as SB 260 does not impose service provider restrictions on the vendors of the operators, unlike the CCPA or the VCDPA.


[IAPP CIPP/US Study Guide], Chapter 10: State Data Security Laws, pp. 229-230.

CIPP/US Practice Questions (Sample Questions), Question 33.

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Leontine
3 months ago
Definitely B, they can't collect info from kids under 13!
upvoted 0 times
...
Margot
4 months ago
I thought surveys were just for adults. This is weird.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tran
4 months ago
Wait, can they really collect info from kids that young?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jolanda
4 months ago
Totally agree, kids shouldn't be giving out info like that!
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosann
4 months ago
Sounds like a clear violation of COPPA.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eun
5 months ago
I thought there were specific rules about marketing to children, but I can't remember if it was about privacy or just general advertising. I guess B makes the most sense, but I'm not completely confident.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosendo
5 months ago
This scenario reminds me of a practice question we did about online surveys targeting kids. I think the FTC would definitely take action against collecting info from a child under 13, so B seems correct.
upvoted 0 times
...
Susy
5 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like collecting personal information from children without parental consent is a big no-no. That makes me lean towards B too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Huey
5 months ago
I remember something about the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act, which restricts data collection from kids under 13. So, I think option B might be the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brynn
5 months ago
I feel pretty good about B as the answer. The scenario clearly states the marketer collected personal info from a child, which is a violation. The other options don't seem to fit as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dalene
5 months ago
This is a tricky one. There are a few different violations that could apply here. I'm leaning towards B, but I'll need to re-read the scenario a few times to make sure I'm not missing anything.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlene
5 months ago
Okay, let's see. The key details are that the marketer collected personal info from a child and it seems to be a deceptive marketing ploy. I think B is the best answer, but I'll double-check the other options just to be sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tonette
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a little unsure here. The question mentions other commercial emails, so it could also be about failing to notify of a breach. I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mozell
5 months ago
This seems like a straightforward case of collecting personal information from a child without proper consent. I'm pretty confident the answer is B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cory
10 months ago
I'm with Matt on this one. Clearly, the marketer is crossing some serious lines here. It's like they're trying to build an army of 10-year-old informants or something. Option B all the way!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lina
10 months ago
Haha, I bet the marketer thought they were being sneaky, trying to lure kids with a contest. But Matt's not having any of that! He's going straight to the authorities. Gotta protect those little digital footprints!
upvoted 0 times
Johana
9 months ago
Good on Matt for taking action and reporting the incident to the authorities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rory
9 months ago
I know, it's really concerning how they were trying to collect personal information from children.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacob
9 months ago
That's so sneaky of the marketer to target kids like that.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Luis
11 months ago
Option B seems like the obvious choice here. Gathering information from a child under 13 without parental consent is a big no-no. I bet the FTC is going to have a field day with this marketer.
upvoted 0 times
Florinda
9 months ago
I hope the FTC takes swift action to protect children's privacy online.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merlyn
9 months ago
They should have known better than to target kids like that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Christoper
9 months ago
I agree, that's definitely a violation. The FTC takes that very seriously.
upvoted 0 times
...
Desmond
9 months ago
B) Collecting information from a child under the age of thirteen.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Shanda
11 months ago
I think the FTC should definitely take action against the marketer for this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stefan
11 months ago
Wow, this scenario really hits home. Collecting personal information from a 10-year-old without proper consent? That's a clear violation of privacy laws, especially the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA).
upvoted 0 times
Loise
10 months ago
I agree, it's really concerning. The marketer should have known better than to ask for personal details from a 10-year-old.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carlton
10 months ago
That's definitely a violation of privacy laws. They shouldn't be collecting information from young children like that.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Laura
11 months ago
I agree, that's a clear violation of privacy laws.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fairy
11 months ago
I can't believe they were collecting information from a child under thirteen!
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel