Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

IAPP CIPP/US Exam - Topic 2 Question 78 Discussion

Posted by Whitney on Apr 05, 2025 at 01:03 PM

Which of the following is an example of federal preemption?

Suggested Answer: D

Federal preemption is a doctrine in law that allows a federal law to take precedence over or to displace a state law in certain matters of national importance (such as interstate commerce). The doctrine is based on the Supremacy Clause of the Constitution, which declares that federal law is the ''supreme law of the land'' and that state judges are bound by it. There are two types of federal preemption: express and implied. Express preemption occurs when Congress expressly states that a federal law is intended to preempt certain types of state legislation. Implied preemption occurs when a state law conflicts with federal law because it is impossible to comply with both at the same time, or because it interferes with the objectives of the federal law, or because the federal government has fully occupied the field of regulation.

The U.S. Controlling the Assault of Non-Solicited Pornography and Marketing (CAN-SPAM) Act is an example of express preemption. The Act regulates commercial email messages and establishes requirements for senders and penalties for violations. The Act also explicitly preempts any state law that ''expressly regulates the use of electronic mail to send commercial messages'', except for state laws that prohibit falsity or deception. This means that states cannot pass laws that impose greater obligations on senders of email marketing than the federal law, such as requiring opt-in consent or providing additional opt-out mechanisms. Therefore, the CAN-SPAM Act is the correct answer to the question.

The other options are not examples of federal preemption. The Payment Card Industry's (PCI) ability to self-regulate and enforce data security standards for payment card data is not a federal law, but a private sector initiative. The U.S. Federal Trade Commission's (FTC) ability to enforce against unfair and deceptive trade practices across sectors and industries is not a preemption of state law, but a concurrent power that can coexist with state consumer protection laws. The California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) regulating businesses that have no physical brick-and-mortal presence in California, but which do business there, is not preempted by any federal law, but is a state law that applies to entities that meet certain criteria of collecting or selling personal information of California residents.Reference:Federal preemption,What is Federal Preemption?,Federal preemption Definition & Meaning,preemption,Preemption legal definition of Preemption, CAN-SPAM Act, IAPP CIPP/US Study Guide, Chapter 2.


Get Premium CIPP/US Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
30 comments · newest first
DE
Devorah 11 months ago
Not sure about D, seems too broad for federal control.
ST
Stephen 11 months ago
A is just self-regulation, not preemption.
TE
Tegan 11 months ago
Wait, can states really not make their own email laws?
RE
Rebbecca 11 months ago
I think B is more about enforcement, not preemption.
KA
Karma 11 months ago
D is definitely federal preemption!
LU
Luis 12 months ago
The CCPA seems like it could be an example of state law, so I'm leaning towards D with the CAN-SPAM Act.
RE
Reed 12 months ago
I’m a bit lost on this one. I thought the FTC had some preemptive powers, but I can't recall the specifics.
ME
Melodie 1 year ago
I remember practicing a question about the CAN-SPAM Act and how it limits state laws. That might be the right answer here.
ER
Erick 1 year ago
I think federal preemption is when federal law overrides state law, but I'm not sure if that applies to all these options.
ME
Merissa 1 year ago
I'm feeling a bit lost on this one. Can someone explain federal preemption to me again? I want to make sure I understand the concept before I try to apply it to these options.
DE
Devorah 1 year ago
Okay, I've got this. The CAN-SPAM Act prohibiting states from passing stricter email marketing laws is a clear example of federal preemption. The federal law is overriding any state-level regulations.
ON
Oneida 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a little unsure about this one. I know federal preemption is when federal law takes precedence, but I'm not sure which of these examples best illustrates that concept.
AN
Anthony 1 year ago
This question seems straightforward. I think the key is to identify which of the examples shows federal preemption, where federal law overrides state law.
PA
Patti 1 year ago
I'm with the others, D is the winner. Gotta love when the feds step in and say 'no, no, this is how it's gonna be.'
RO
Rodrigo 1 year ago
↳ replying to Patti
Federal regulations can definitely override state laws in certain situations.
FR
Francene 1 year ago
↳ replying to Patti
It's true, the CAN-SPAM Act does prevent states from imposing stricter laws on email marketing.
LO
Lorrine 1 year ago
↳ replying to Patti
I agree, D is a clear example of federal preemption.
GW
Gwen 1 year ago
Ooh, federal preemption, my favorite! D all the way, folks. The CAN-SPAM Act trumps state laws like a boss.
MY
Myrtie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Gwen
Interesting point, but I still think D is the best example. It clearly shows federal law taking precedence over state laws.
ME
Melodie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Gwen
I think A might also be an example of federal preemption. The PCI self-regulating standards could override state laws.
LA
Lashaunda 1 year ago
↳ replying to Gwen
I agree, D is the correct answer. The CAN-SPAM Act does preempt state laws when it comes to email marketing.
NE
Nell 2 years ago
I agree, D is the way to go. The CAN-SPAM Act overrides state laws, which is the very definition of federal preemption.
NO
Novella 1 year ago
↳ replying to Nell
Agreed, D is the correct answer. It exemplifies federal preemption by prohibiting states from passing certain laws.
RO
Rosita 1 year ago
↳ replying to Nell
Definitely, D is the way to go. It clearly demonstrates federal preemption.
NI
Nickolas 1 year ago
↳ replying to Nell
Yes, D is the best choice. It shows federal preemption in action.
CO
Coleen 2 years ago
↳ replying to Nell
I think D is the correct answer. The CAN-SPAM Act does override state laws.
RE
Remona 2 years ago
But D is an example of federal preemption because it restricts states from passing laws that go beyond federal regulations.
NA
Natalie 2 years ago
Option D is the correct answer. The CAN-SPAM Act preempts state laws, so it's a clear example of federal preemption.
LE
Leatha 2 years ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is A.
RE
Remona 2 years ago
I think the answer is D.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel