Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

IAPP CIPP/US Exam - Topic 2 Question 77 Discussion

Actual exam question for IAPP's CIPP/US exam
Question #: 77
Topic #: 2
[All CIPP/US Questions]

SCENARIO

Please use the following to answer the next QUESTION

Otto is preparing a report to his Board of Directors at Filtration Station, where he is responsible for the privacy program. Filtration Station is a U.S. company that sells filters and tubing products to pharmaceutical companies for research use. The company is based in Seattle, Washington, with offices throughout the U.S. and Asi

a. It sells to business customers across both the U.S. and the Asia-Pacific region. Filtration Station participates in the Cross-Border Privacy Rules system of the APEC Privacy Framework.

Unfortunately, Filtration Station suffered a data breach in the previous quarter. An unknown third party was able

to gain access to Filtration Station's network and was able to steal data relating to employees in the company's Human Resources database, which is hosted by a third-party cloud provider based in the U.S. The HR data is encrypted. Filtration Station also uses the third-party cloud provider to host its business marketing contact database. The marketing database was not affected by the data breach. It appears that the data breach was caused when a system administrator at the cloud provider stored the encryption keys with the data itself.

The Board has asked Otto to provide information about the data breach and how updates on new developments in privacy laws and regulations apply to Filtration Station. They are particularly concerned about staying up to date on the various U.S. state laws and regulations that have been in the news, especially the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) and breach notification requirements.

The Board has asked Otto whether the company will need to comply with the new California Consumer Privacy Law (CCPA). What should Otto tell the Board?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Brandon
4 months ago
Isn't it weird that the breach happened due to poor key management?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ezekiel
4 months ago
I think they should definitely consider the implications of CCPA.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorita
5 months ago
Wait, so business contact info might be personal info? That sounds a bit off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Theola
5 months ago
CCPA applies to any business that serves California residents, not just CA-based companies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glenn
5 months ago
Totally agree! They need to be compliant regardless of where they're based.
upvoted 0 times
...
Svetlana
5 months ago
I recall that the CCPA has specific thresholds for compliance, so I’m not convinced that just being outside California exempts them completely.
upvoted 0 times
...
Armando
6 months ago
I practiced a question about whether business contact info counts as personal data under CCPA, and I think that could be relevant for Otto's report.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arleen
6 months ago
I’m a bit unsure, but I think the CCPA could apply to Filtration Station since they deal with personal data, even if they’re based in Washington.
upvoted 0 times
...
Agustin
6 months ago
I remember discussing how the CCPA applies to businesses outside California if they meet certain criteria, so I think Otto needs to clarify that point.
upvoted 0 times
...
Salena
6 months ago
Okay, I think I've got a handle on this. The company is based in Seattle, but it sells to customers in the U.S. and Asia-Pacific region. The CCPA is a California law, so it would only apply to the company's California-based operations, if any. Since the question doesn't mention any California-based offices or customers, I'm leaning towards the answer that the CCPA doesn't apply to this company.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emiko
6 months ago
This seems like a tricky one. The company had a data breach, which could trigger certain notification requirements under the CCPA. But the question is specifically asking about whether the CCPA applies to the company in the first place. I'll need to really focus on the details about the company's operations and location to determine if they fall under the CCPA's jurisdiction.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cathrine
7 months ago
I think the key here is that the company participates in the APEC Cross-Border Privacy Rules system. That might mean they're already following certain privacy standards that could overlap with the CCPA. I'd want to look into how the CCPA interacts with other privacy frameworks like APEC CBPR.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mona
7 months ago
Okay, let's see here. The company is based in Seattle, Washington, but it sells to customers in the U.S. and Asia-Pacific region. The CCPA is a California law, so I'm not sure if it would apply to this company. I'll need to look into the specific requirements of the CCPA to determine if Filtration Station needs to comply.
upvoted 0 times
...
Freeman
7 months ago
I'm not entirely sure about this one. The question seems to be focused on the CCPA, but there are a lot of details about the company and the data breach that could be relevant. I'll need to carefully read through the scenario and think about how the CCPA might apply.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elise
12 months ago
Wow, imagine trying to keep up with all these privacy laws. Filtration Station should just move to a desert island and forget about the whole thing.
upvoted 0 times
Joesph
10 months ago
I agree, it must be overwhelming to stay on top of all these regulations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Skye
10 months ago
C) That business contact information could be considered personal information governed by CCPA.
upvoted 0 times
...
Judy
11 months ago
A) That CCPA will apply to the company only after the California Attorney General determines that it will enforce the statute.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Brittani
12 months ago
I'm going with C. The HR data breach seems to have exposed personal information, and CCPA has a broad definition of what counts as personal data. Better safe than sorry, right?
upvoted 0 times
Fletcher
10 months ago
Definitely, especially with all the recent data privacy regulations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vallie
10 months ago
I agree, it's better to err on the side of caution when it comes to personal data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaclyn
11 months ago
C
upvoted 0 times
...
Leota
11 months ago
A
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tanesha
1 year ago
Ha! Filtration Station should be glad they're not based in California. D seems like the easiest way out of this compliance headache.
upvoted 0 times
Dominque
11 months ago
D) That CCPA only applies to companies based in California, which exempts the company from compliance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristine
12 months ago
Ha! Filtration Station should be glad they're not based in California. D seems like the easiest way out of this compliance headache.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mari
12 months ago
A) That CCPA will apply to the company only after the California Attorney General determines that it will enforce the statute.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nana
1 year ago
I think Otto should also mention that business contact information could be considered personal information governed by CCPA.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fletcher
1 year ago
I agree with Bronwyn. It's important for the company to stay informed about the latest privacy laws and regulations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bronwyn
1 year ago
I think Otto should tell the Board that CCPA will apply to the company only after the California Attorney General determines that it will enforce the statute.
upvoted 0 times
...
Owen
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. Does the fact that Filtration Station is based in Seattle mean it's exempt from CCPA? The question is a bit ambiguous.
upvoted 0 times
Emilio
11 months ago
Yes, I agree. Business contact information could fall under CCPA regulations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lajuana
11 months ago
C) That business contact information could be considered personal information governed by CCPA.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ciara
11 months ago
Hmm, I think that makes sense. The location of the company might not exempt it from CCPA.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lilli
11 months ago
A) That CCPA will apply to the company only after the California Attorney General determines that it will enforce the statute.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ollie
11 months ago
Yes, I agree. Business contact information could fall under CCPA regulations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ressie
11 months ago
C) That business contact information could be considered personal information governed by CCPA.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bonita
11 months ago
Hmm, I think that makes sense. The location of the company might not exempt it from CCPA.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tawna
1 year ago
A) That CCPA will apply to the company only after the California Attorney General determines that it will enforce the statute.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ceola
1 year ago
I think the correct answer is C. The breach affected employee data, which could be considered personal information under CCPA. The company should review its CCPA compliance regardless of its participation in CPBR.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel