Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

IAPP Exam CIPP-US Topic 2 Question 77 Discussion

Actual exam question for IAPP's CIPP-US exam
Question #: 77
Topic #: 2
[All CIPP-US Questions]

SCENARIO

Please use the following to answer the next QUESTION

Otto is preparing a report to his Board of Directors at Filtration Station, where he is responsible for the privacy program. Filtration Station is a U.S. company that sells filters and tubing products to pharmaceutical companies for research use. The company is based in Seattle, Washington, with offices throughout the U.S. and Asi

a. It sells to business customers across both the U.S. and the Asia-Pacific region. Filtration Station participates in the Cross-Border Privacy Rules system of the APEC Privacy Framework.

Unfortunately, Filtration Station suffered a data breach in the previous quarter. An unknown third party was able

to gain access to Filtration Station's network and was able to steal data relating to employees in the company's Human Resources database, which is hosted by a third-party cloud provider based in the U.S. The HR data is encrypted. Filtration Station also uses the third-party cloud provider to host its business marketing contact database. The marketing database was not affected by the data breach. It appears that the data breach was caused when a system administrator at the cloud provider stored the encryption keys with the data itself.

The Board has asked Otto to provide information about the data breach and how updates on new developments in privacy laws and regulations apply to Filtration Station. They are particularly concerned about staying up to date on the various U.S. state laws and regulations that have been in the news, especially the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) and breach notification requirements.

The Board has asked Otto whether the company will need to comply with the new California Consumer Privacy Law (CCPA). What should Otto tell the Board?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer

Contribute your Thoughts:

Elise
22 days ago
Wow, imagine trying to keep up with all these privacy laws. Filtration Station should just move to a desert island and forget about the whole thing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brittani
26 days ago
I'm going with C. The HR data breach seems to have exposed personal information, and CCPA has a broad definition of what counts as personal data. Better safe than sorry, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Tanesha
1 months ago
Ha! Filtration Station should be glad they're not based in California. D seems like the easiest way out of this compliance headache.
upvoted 0 times
Dominque
7 days ago
D) That CCPA only applies to companies based in California, which exempts the company from compliance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristine
20 days ago
Ha! Filtration Station should be glad they're not based in California. D seems like the easiest way out of this compliance headache.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mari
21 days ago
A) That CCPA will apply to the company only after the California Attorney General determines that it will enforce the statute.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nana
2 months ago
I think Otto should also mention that business contact information could be considered personal information governed by CCPA.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fletcher
2 months ago
I agree with Bronwyn. It's important for the company to stay informed about the latest privacy laws and regulations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bronwyn
2 months ago
I think Otto should tell the Board that CCPA will apply to the company only after the California Attorney General determines that it will enforce the statute.
upvoted 0 times
...
Owen
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. Does the fact that Filtration Station is based in Seattle mean it's exempt from CCPA? The question is a bit ambiguous.
upvoted 0 times
Yes, I agree. Business contact information could fall under CCPA regulations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ressie
23 hours ago
C) That business contact information could be considered personal information governed by CCPA.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bonita
3 days ago
Hmm, I think that makes sense. The location of the company might not exempt it from CCPA.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tawna
1 months ago
A) That CCPA will apply to the company only after the California Attorney General determines that it will enforce the statute.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ceola
2 months ago
I think the correct answer is C. The breach affected employee data, which could be considered personal information under CCPA. The company should review its CCPA compliance regardless of its participation in CPBR.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel