Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25

- Free Preparation Discussions

IAPP CIPP/US Exam - Topic 1 Question 59 Discussion

Actual exam question for IAPP's CIPP/US exam

Question #: 59
Topic #: 1

[All CIPP/US Questions]

Which of the following is commonly required for an entity to be subject to breach notification requirements under most state laws?

AThe entity must conduct business in the state

BThe entity must have employees in the state

CThe entity must be registered in the state

DThe entity must be an information broker

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: D

IAPP Book, Section 4.3.1.1, paragraph 3.

by Shizue at Jul 02, 2024, 07:46 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CIPP/US Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Viola

10 months ago

Wait, so you can be based elsewhere and still be liable? That's surprising!

upvoted 0 times

...

Rashad

10 months ago

D? Really? That sounds too specific.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ammie

10 months ago

C seems right to me, but I'm not 100% sure.

upvoted 0 times

...

Verdell

10 months ago

I think B is more common, though.

upvoted 0 times

...

Artie

11 months ago

A is definitely a requirement in most states.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ranee

11 months ago

I don't recall specifics, but I know that being an information broker isn't always necessary, so I doubt D is correct.

upvoted 0 times

...

Matt

11 months ago

I practiced a similar question, and I feel like having employees in the state could be a factor, so B could be right.

upvoted 0 times

...

Noah

11 months ago

I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about registration being important, so maybe C?

upvoted 0 times

...

Avery

11 months ago

I think the answer might be A, since most laws focus on where the business operates.

upvoted 0 times

...

Stefany

11 months ago

I'm a bit confused by this question. The options seem to cover different ways an entity could have a presence in a state, but I'm not sure which one is the most common requirement for breach notification laws. I'll have to think it through step-by-step.

upvoted 0 times

...

Diane

11 months ago

Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm not totally sure about the specifics of breach notification laws across different states. I'll have to think through the options carefully and see if any stand out as the most likely common requirement.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rex

11 months ago

I think the key here is to focus on the common requirements across most state laws. The options seem to be getting at different types of entity presence or registration in the state, so I'll need to think about which one is most commonly required.

upvoted 0 times

...

Brent

12 months ago

Okay, I've got a strategy for this. Most state breach notification laws are focused on protecting residents' personal information, so the entity likely needs some kind of connection to the state, like doing business there or having customers/employees there. I'll rule out the less common options.

upvoted 0 times

...

Josephine

12 months ago

I'm a little confused by this question. The options seem similar, and I'm not totally clear on the differences between them. I'll make my best guess, but I'm not super confident in my answer.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sylvia

12 months ago

This seems like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully consider the details about Tom's actions and the implications for Mary.

upvoted 0 times

...

Annamae

1 year ago

This is a tricky one, but I'm leaning towards Option B. Having employees in the state seems like a logical trigger for breach notification obligations.

upvoted 0 times

Erasmo

1 year ago

I'm not sure, but I think Option D might also be a possibility. Being an information broker could potentially trigger breach notification obligations.

upvoted 0 times

...

Clarinda

1 year ago

I agree with you, Option A makes sense. It's important for businesses to be aware of these requirements.

upvoted 0 times

...

Charlene

1 year ago

I think it's actually Option A. Conducting business in the state would likely make the entity subject to breach notification requirements.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Ria

1 year ago

Hmm, I think Option D is the correct answer. Information brokers are often specifically targeted by breach notification laws, so that seems like the most common requirement.

upvoted 0 times

Wilson

1 year ago

I agree with both of you. Option D makes sense, but Option A could also be a factor in some state laws.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shantell

1 year ago

I'm not sure, but I think Option A might also be a requirement. Conducting business in the state seems like it could trigger breach notification requirements.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tamie

1 year ago

I think Option D is correct too. Information brokers are definitely a common target for breach notification laws.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Brent

1 year ago

Haha, so if I open an online store and never set foot in the state, I can just ignore their breach laws? Sounds like a loophole to me!

upvoted 0 times

...

Letha

1 year ago

Wait, does that mean if I run a business from my home in another state, I'm not subject to the breach laws here? That's kind of concerning.

upvoted 0 times

Telma

1 year ago

C) The entity must be registered in the state

upvoted 0 times

...

Jeniffer

1 year ago

B) The entity must have employees in the state

upvoted 0 times

...

Fidelia

1 year ago

A) The entity must conduct business in the state

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Glendora

1 year ago

But doesn't the entity need to have a presence in the state to be subject to breach notification requirements?

upvoted 0 times

...

Leota

1 year ago

I disagree, I believe the answer is D) The entity must be an information broker.

upvoted 0 times

...

Glendora

1 year ago

I think the answer is A) The entity must conduct business in the state.

upvoted 0 times

...