Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

IAPP CIPP/C Exam - Topic 1 Question 5 Discussion

The U.S. Supreme Court has recognized an individual's right to privacy over personal issues, such as contraception, by acknowledging which of the following?
B) A ''penumbra'' of unenumerated constitutional rights as well as more general protections of due process of law.
A) Federal preemption of state constitutions that expressly recognize an individual right to privacy.
C) An interpretation of the U.S. Constitution's explicit definition of privacy that extends to personal issues.
D) The doctrine of stare decisis, which allows the U.S. Supreme Court to follow the precedent of previously decided case law.

IAPP CIPP/C Exam - Topic 1 Question 5 Discussion

Actual exam question for IAPP's CIPP/C exam
Question #: 5
Topic #: 1
[All CIPP/C Questions]

The U.S. Supreme Court has recognized an individual's right to privacy over personal issues, such as contraception, by acknowledging which of the following?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Talia at May 05, 2022, 01:20 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CIPP/C Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Dominga
9 months ago
C is misleading; it’s not just about explicit definitions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Temeka
10 months ago
D is interesting too, but it’s definitely about the unenumerated rights.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominic
10 months ago
Wait, are we sure about B? Sounds a bit vague.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marion
10 months ago
Totally agree, B makes the most sense!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronald
10 months ago
It's B, the "penumbra" of rights is key here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isadora
10 months ago
D seems off to me because it talks about precedent rather than the right to privacy itself. I don't think that's the focus of this question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malcom
10 months ago
I feel like C could be a contender too, but I can't recall if the Constitution actually defines privacy explicitly. It seems more like an interpretation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willie
10 months ago
I think the answer might be B, but I'm not entirely sure about the term "penumbra." It sounds familiar from our discussions on privacy rights.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonardo
10 months ago
I remember practicing a question similar to this, and I think it was about how the Supreme Court interprets rights not explicitly listed in the Constitution. That makes me lean towards B as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lanie
10 months ago
Hmm, I'm a little confused by all the different variables and calculations involved. I'll need to carefully read through the details and make sure I understand each option fully before deciding.
upvoted 0 times
...
Coletta
11 months ago
I think the key here is to identify the role that is specifically designed for viewing confidential HR data. That's likely the answer, but I'll double-check the options to be sure.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel