Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

IAPP CIPP/A Exam - Topic 1 Question 62 Discussion

Which of the following is NOT a substantial source of privacy protection for Hong Kong citizens?
A) The Communications and Surveillance Ordinance.
B) The Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
C) The Bill of Rights Ordinance.
D) The Basic Law.

IAPP CIPP/A Exam - Topic 1 Question 62 Discussion

Actual exam question for IAPP's CIPP/A exam
Question #: 62
Topic #: 1
[All CIPP/A Questions]

Which of the following is NOT a substantial source of privacy protection for Hong Kong citizens?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

https://tahseen.ae/media/3481/india_information-technology-reasonable-security-practices-and- procedures-and-sensitive-personal-data-or-information-rules-2011.pdf

by Christiane at Jul 14, 2024, 03:37 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CIPP/A Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Kendra
10 months ago
I thought the Universal Declaration of Human Rights had more weight in HK.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tenesha
10 months ago
The Bill of Rights Ordinance is actually a solid source for privacy rights.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorcas
10 months ago
Wait, are we sure the Basic Law isn't a good source of privacy?
upvoted 0 times
...
Leota
10 months ago
Totally agree, it doesn't really protect privacy at all!
upvoted 0 times
...
Vince
11 months ago
The Communications and Surveillance Ordinance is mainly about surveillance, not privacy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Argelia
11 months ago
The Basic Law is fundamental, but I feel like it might not cover privacy as much as the others do.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawnee
11 months ago
The Bill of Rights Ordinance sounds like it should protect privacy, but I can't recall all the details about it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Darrin
11 months ago
I remember discussing the Universal Declaration of Human Rights in class, but I’m not sure if it directly applies to Hong Kong citizens.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ressie
11 months ago
I think the Communications and Surveillance Ordinance is actually meant to regulate privacy, so it might not be the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Harris
11 months ago
Okay, I think I've got it. Let me carefully consider each option and eliminate the one that is not a major source of privacy protection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hubert
11 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'll need to review my notes on Hong Kong's privacy laws to determine which option is the least substantial.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brice
11 months ago
I'm confident I know the answer, but I'll double-check my understanding of the relevant laws and ordinances just to be sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonio
11 months ago
This question seems straightforward, but I want to make sure I understand the context correctly before answering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lettie
12 months ago
The options cover different legal frameworks, so I'll need to think carefully about which one is not a substantial source of privacy protection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chau
12 months ago
This looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully read through the question and options to figure out the right approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nichelle
12 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The question mentions creating a virtual switch and VNICs, but the answer options don't seem to directly match that. I'll need to think this through step-by-step.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noel
1 year ago
Wait, is the Basic Law actually a source of privacy protection? I thought it was more about Hong Kong's governance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nadine
1 year ago
Haha, I bet the answer is the Communications and Surveillance Ordinance. That's probably the one that provides the least privacy protection.
upvoted 0 times
Lashon
1 year ago
User 4: So, the answer is A) The Communications and Surveillance Ordinance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gene
1 year ago
User 3: I think the Basic Law also plays a role in protecting privacy rights in Hong Kong.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raina
1 year ago
User 2: Yeah, I agree. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the Bill of Rights Ordinance seem more likely to provide privacy protection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pamela
1 year ago
User 1: I think you're right, the Communications and Surveillance Ordinance doesn't sound like it protects privacy.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Floyd
1 year ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm going to have to say The Bill of Rights Ordinance, since that's more of a general human rights document.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lili
1 year ago
I'm going to go with B. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights is more of a general guideline, not a specific Hong Kong law.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fernanda
1 year ago
The Basic Law seems like the obvious answer here. Hong Kong citizens need more protection than just a declaration of human rights.
upvoted 0 times
Kina
1 year ago
C) The Bill of Rights Ordinance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noel
1 year ago
B) The Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jenifer
1 year ago
A) The Communications and Surveillance Ordinance.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ryan
1 year ago
But the Universal Declaration of Human Rights is a global document, not specific to Hong Kong. I still think it's A).
upvoted 0 times
...
Osvaldo
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is B) The Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ryan
1 year ago
I think the answer is A) The Communications and Surveillance Ordinance.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel