Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

IAPP CIPP/A Exam - Topic 1 Question 62 Discussion

Actual exam question for IAPP's CIPP/A exam
Question #: 62
Topic #: 1
[All CIPP/A Questions]

Which of the following is NOT a substantial source of privacy protection for Hong Kong citizens?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

https://tahseen.ae/media/3481/india_information-technology-reasonable-security-practices-and- procedures-and-sensitive-personal-data-or-information-rules-2011.pdf

by Christiane at Jul 14, 2024, 03:37 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CIPP/A Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Kendra
4 months ago
I thought the Universal Declaration of Human Rights had more weight in HK.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tenesha
4 months ago
The Bill of Rights Ordinance is actually a solid source for privacy rights.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorcas
4 months ago
Wait, are we sure the Basic Law isn't a good source of privacy?
upvoted 0 times
...
Leota
4 months ago
Totally agree, it doesn't really protect privacy at all!
upvoted 0 times
...
Vince
4 months ago
The Communications and Surveillance Ordinance is mainly about surveillance, not privacy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Argelia
5 months ago
The Basic Law is fundamental, but I feel like it might not cover privacy as much as the others do.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawnee
5 months ago
The Bill of Rights Ordinance sounds like it should protect privacy, but I can't recall all the details about it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Darrin
5 months ago
I remember discussing the Universal Declaration of Human Rights in class, but I’m not sure if it directly applies to Hong Kong citizens.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ressie
5 months ago
I think the Communications and Surveillance Ordinance is actually meant to regulate privacy, so it might not be the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Harris
5 months ago
Okay, I think I've got it. Let me carefully consider each option and eliminate the one that is not a major source of privacy protection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hubert
5 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'll need to review my notes on Hong Kong's privacy laws to determine which option is the least substantial.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brice
5 months ago
I'm confident I know the answer, but I'll double-check my understanding of the relevant laws and ordinances just to be sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonio
5 months ago
This question seems straightforward, but I want to make sure I understand the context correctly before answering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lettie
5 months ago
The options cover different legal frameworks, so I'll need to think carefully about which one is not a substantial source of privacy protection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chau
6 months ago
This looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully read through the question and options to figure out the right approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nichelle
6 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The question mentions creating a virtual switch and VNICs, but the answer options don't seem to directly match that. I'll need to think this through step-by-step.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noel
10 months ago
Wait, is the Basic Law actually a source of privacy protection? I thought it was more about Hong Kong's governance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nadine
10 months ago
Haha, I bet the answer is the Communications and Surveillance Ordinance. That's probably the one that provides the least privacy protection.
upvoted 0 times
Lashon
8 months ago
User 4: So, the answer is A) The Communications and Surveillance Ordinance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gene
8 months ago
User 3: I think the Basic Law also plays a role in protecting privacy rights in Hong Kong.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raina
8 months ago
User 2: Yeah, I agree. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the Bill of Rights Ordinance seem more likely to provide privacy protection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pamela
8 months ago
User 1: I think you're right, the Communications and Surveillance Ordinance doesn't sound like it protects privacy.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Floyd
10 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm going to have to say The Bill of Rights Ordinance, since that's more of a general human rights document.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lili
10 months ago
I'm going to go with B. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights is more of a general guideline, not a specific Hong Kong law.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fernanda
10 months ago
The Basic Law seems like the obvious answer here. Hong Kong citizens need more protection than just a declaration of human rights.
upvoted 0 times
Kina
9 months ago
C) The Bill of Rights Ordinance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noel
10 months ago
B) The Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jenifer
10 months ago
A) The Communications and Surveillance Ordinance.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ryan
11 months ago
But the Universal Declaration of Human Rights is a global document, not specific to Hong Kong. I still think it's A).
upvoted 0 times
...
Osvaldo
11 months ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is B) The Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ryan
12 months ago
I think the answer is A) The Communications and Surveillance Ordinance.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel