Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

IAPP CIPP/A Exam - Topic 1 Question 19 Discussion

How was the Supreme Court's ruling in the Maneka Gandhi v Union of India case significant to Indian law?
D) It ruled that under Article 32 of the Constitution individuals may file writ petitions when they feel their rights were violated.
A) It expanded the interpretation of right to life under Article 21 of the Constitution.
B) It established that privacy is a fundamental right granted by the Constitution under Article 21.
C) It upheld that the impounding of passports for 'public interest' is allowable under Section 10(3)(c) of the Passports Act.

IAPP CIPP/A Exam - Topic 1 Question 19 Discussion

Actual exam question for IAPP's CIPP/A exam
Question #: 19
Topic #: 1
[All CIPP/A Questions]

How was the Supreme Court's ruling in the Maneka Gandhi v Union of India case significant to Indian law?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Galen at May 05, 2022, 06:52 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CIPP/A Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Gerardo
11 months ago
I thought the passport issue was more about national security than rights.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nana
11 months ago
Article 32 was a big win for citizens too!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lillian
11 months ago
Wait, are we sure it really established privacy as a fundamental right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Page
11 months ago
Totally agree, that was a game changer for individual rights.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daniel
11 months ago
It expanded the interpretation of right to life under Article 21!
upvoted 0 times
...
Bettyann
11 months ago
I vaguely remember that the case involved the impounding of passports, but I don't think that was the main takeaway. It seems like a distraction from the bigger issues at play.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fatima
11 months ago
I practiced a similar question where the focus was on the implications of the ruling for individual rights. I feel like option B could be correct too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emerson
11 months ago
I think it was about the right to life and personal liberty, which makes me lean towards option A, but I also recall something about privacy being discussed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
11 months ago
I remember that the Maneka Gandhi case was really important for expanding Article 21, but I'm not sure if it specifically mentioned privacy as a fundamental right.
upvoted 0 times
...
Veronica
12 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about program management. I think the key is to identify the right document that the program manager would use to track and monitor opportunities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carissa
12 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the wording of these options. I'll need to re-read the question and think about it some more.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malissa
12 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. I know the "whoami" command shows your username, but I'm not sure if it displays group information. I'll have to think about this a bit more.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherell
12 months ago
This seems straightforward enough. I just need to focus on the cash flows and discount them appropriately based on the term structure. The credit risk considerations are an added wrinkle, but I think I can work through that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodolfo
12 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by the details in this question. I'll need to re-read it a few times to make sure I understand what's being asked.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel