Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

IAPP CIPP/A Exam - Topic 1 Question 12 Discussion

In what case would a foreign company NOT be liable for breaches of Singapore's PDPA?
D) If it collects information from Singaporeans living abroad.
A) If it has a physical office in Singapore.
B) If it is storing information in Singapore.
C) If it is collecting personal information in Singapore.

IAPP CIPP/A Exam - Topic 1 Question 12 Discussion

Actual exam question for IAPP's CIPP/A exam
Question #: 12
Topic #: 1
[All CIPP/A Questions]

In what case would a foreign company NOT be liable for breaches of Singapore's PDPA?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Mitsue at May 06, 2022, 03:25 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CIPP/A Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Maurine
11 months ago
I disagree, they should be liable regardless of location!
upvoted 0 times
...
Marion
11 months ago
A and B don’t matter if they’re not in Singapore.
upvoted 0 times
...
Heike
11 months ago
Surprised that a foreign company can avoid liability at all!
upvoted 0 times
...
Marisha
11 months ago
No way, it’s definitely C!
upvoted 0 times
...
Hayley
11 months ago
I think it's D, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosann
11 months ago
I remember discussing how the PDPA applies to foreign companies, but I can't recall if storing data in Singapore makes them liable. I need to think more about B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Quiana
11 months ago
I’m a bit confused. I thought that if a company collects personal data in Singapore, they would definitely be liable, which makes me lean towards D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gwen
11 months ago
I feel like I studied a similar question, and it was about the jurisdiction of the PDPA. I think if they have a physical office, they might be liable, so maybe it's not A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gladys
11 months ago
I think the answer might be D, but I'm not entirely sure. I remember something about how the PDPA applies to local data collection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carma
12 months ago
I've used the RSA Archer solution before, and I'm pretty confident it's for FISMA compliance. That's the main regulation it's designed to help organizations meet.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leota
12 months ago
I feel like I've seen these constructs before in my VMware Cloud Director training, but I'm having a hard time remembering the exact details. I'll have to use the process of elimination to try to narrow it down.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lawana
12 months ago
I'm a bit confused by this question. The data seems straightforward, but I'm not sure how to properly calculate the related party disclosures. I'll need to review the relevant accounting standards to make sure I'm approaching this correctly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Latrice
12 months ago
I think this question is testing our understanding of how MFA (multi-factor authentication) works. If MFA is enabled on the user's system but not the user account, the user should still be prompted for MFA on their system, so I'll go with option A.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel