I'm feeling a bit 'audited' just thinking about these options. Maybe the privacy organization should consider a more 'principle'-d approach, if you ask me.
Option D, obviously. Everyone loves a good ol' privacy police coming in and handing out fines left and right. It's the only way to keep those pesky companies in line, am I right?
Option D, issuing penalties, seems a bit too aggressive for an independent organization. They're probably better off sticking to more collaborative approaches, like A or C.
I'm not sure, but I feel like option B, enacting new legislation, might be a bit too heavy-handed for an independent organization. They'd probably want to avoid getting tangled up in the political process.
I think option A is the most likely way an independent privacy organization would work to promote sound privacy practices. Self-regulation seems like the most practical approach.
Margot
3 months agoLuke
3 months agoGabriele
3 months agoDierdre
2 months agoDerick
2 months agoGeoffrey
2 months agoMarcelle
3 months agoNikita
2 months agoOllie
2 months agoMalcom
3 months agoShannon
4 months agoElenor
4 months agoBillye
2 months agoTonja
3 months agoYun
3 months agoBillye
4 months agoShawna
4 months agoLang
5 months ago