IAPP AIGP Exam - Topic 7 Question 25 Discussion

Actual exam question for IAPP's AIGP exam

Question #: 25
Topic #: 7

[All AIGP Questions]

Which of the following is an example of a high-risk application under the EU Al Act?

AA resume scanning tool that ranks applicants.

BAn Al-enabled inventory management tool.

CA government-run social scoring tool.

DA customer service chatbot tool.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

The EU AI Act categorizes certain applications of AI as high-risk due to their potential impact on fundamental rights and safety. High-risk applications include those used in critical areas such as employment, education, and essential public services. A government-run social scoring tool, which assesses individuals based on their social behavior or perceived trustworthiness, falls under this category because of its profound implications for privacy, fairness, and individual rights. This contrasts with other AI applications like resume scanning tools or customer service chatbots, which are generally not classified as high-risk under the EU AI Act.

by Natalie at Mar 24, 2025, 06:13 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium AIGP Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Audra

4 months ago

I thought inventory tools were high-risk too, but maybe not?

upvoted 0 times

...

Hillary

5 months ago

Totally agree, C is the most concerning option here!

upvoted 0 times

...

Haydee

5 months ago

I think A could be risky too, ranking applicants can lead to bias.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jerry

5 months ago

Wait, are we really considering chatbots as low-risk? Seems off.

upvoted 0 times

...

Corinne

5 months ago

C is definitely high-risk. Social scoring is a big deal.

upvoted 0 times

...

Susy

6 months ago

I think we practiced a question similar to this, and it was about how applications that evaluate personal data are usually high-risk. So, I’m leaning towards option C.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kiley

6 months ago

I feel like the government-run social scoring tool is definitely high-risk, but I wonder if the chatbot could also fall under that category somehow.

upvoted 0 times

...

Elenor

6 months ago

I remember discussing how tools that affect employment decisions, like resume scanners, could also be high-risk, but I feel like they might not be as severe as social scoring.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lorenza

6 months ago

I think the social scoring tool might be considered high-risk because it directly impacts people's lives and freedoms, but I'm not entirely sure.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gwenn

6 months ago

I think the key here is identifying which application poses the greatest risk to individuals or society. A government social scoring tool sounds like it could have serious negative consequences, so I'm leaning towards that as the high-risk option.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dorathy

7 months ago

Okay, let's see. A resume scanning tool that ranks applicants could be considered high-risk since it's making important decisions about people's employment. But a government social scoring tool seems even more high-risk in terms of potential for abuse and harm.

upvoted 0 times

...

Hermila

7 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit unsure on this one. I know the EU AI Act covers high-risk AI applications, but I'm not totally clear on the specifics. I'll have to think this through carefully.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lenna

7 months ago

I'm pretty sure the answer is C - a government-run social scoring tool. That seems like the most high-risk application under the EU AI Act.

upvoted 0 times

...

Delila

1 year ago

Ha! C) is the obvious choice. Imagine having your entire existence reduced to a number by the government. That's the stuff of nightmares!

upvoted 0 times

Alex

11 months ago

D) A customer service chatbot tool.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kathrine

11 months ago

C) A government-run social scoring tool.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jaclyn

12 months ago

B) An Al-enabled inventory management tool.

upvoted 0 times

...

Noelia

12 months ago

A) A resume scanning tool that ranks applicants.

upvoted 0 times

...

Carin

1 year ago

Hmm, I'd say C) is the clear winner here. Giving the government the power to score citizens? That's a recipe for dystopia!

upvoted 0 times

Brendan

12 months ago

Yeah, the idea of a government social scoring tool is pretty concerning.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ethan

12 months ago

I agree, C) is definitely a high-risk application.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ressie

1 year ago

C) A government-run social scoring tool. That's a no-brainer! Anything involving social scoring is bound to be high-risk.

upvoted 0 times

France

11 months ago

B) An AI-enabled inventory management tool.

upvoted 0 times

...

Brittney

11 months ago

D) A customer service chatbot tool.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gearldine

11 months ago

A) A resume scanning tool that ranks applicants.

upvoted 0 times

...

Bettye

11 months ago

C) A government-run social scoring tool. That's a no-brainer! Anything involving social scoring is bound to be high-risk.

upvoted 0 times

...

India

11 months ago

B) An AI-enabled inventory management tool.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sheron

12 months ago

D) A customer service chatbot tool.

upvoted 0 times

...

Stephaine

12 months ago

A) A resume scanning tool that ranks applicants.

upvoted 0 times

...

Pearly

12 months ago

C) A government-run social scoring tool. That's a no-brainer! Anything involving social scoring is bound to be high-risk.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tonette

1 year ago

I think B) An AI-enabled inventory management tool is low-risk compared to the other options.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tess

1 year ago

I believe A) A resume scanning tool can also be high-risk if not properly regulated.

upvoted 0 times

...

Georgeanna

1 year ago

I agree with Glenna, social scoring can lead to privacy concerns.

upvoted 0 times

...

Glenna

1 year ago

I think C) A government-run social scoring tool is high-risk.

upvoted 0 times

...