Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

IAPP AIGP Exam - Topic 7 Question 25 Discussion

Posted by Natalie on Mar 24, 2025 at 06:13 AM

Which of the following is an example of a high-risk application under the EU Al Act?

Suggested Answer: C

The EU AI Act categorizes certain applications of AI as high-risk due to their potential impact on fundamental rights and safety. High-risk applications include those used in critical areas such as employment, education, and essential public services. A government-run social scoring tool, which assesses individuals based on their social behavior or perceived trustworthiness, falls under this category because of its profound implications for privacy, fairness, and individual rights. This contrasts with other AI applications like resume scanning tools or customer service chatbots, which are generally not classified as high-risk under the EU AI Act.


Get Premium AIGP Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
34 comments · newest first
AU
Audra 10 months ago
I thought inventory tools were high-risk too, but maybe not?
HI
Hillary 11 months ago
Totally agree, C is the most concerning option here!
HA
Haydee 11 months ago
I think A could be risky too, ranking applicants can lead to bias.
JE
Jerry 11 months ago
Wait, are we really considering chatbots as low-risk? Seems off.
CO
Corinne 11 months ago
C is definitely high-risk. Social scoring is a big deal.
SU
Susy 12 months ago
I think we practiced a question similar to this, and it was about how applications that evaluate personal data are usually high-risk. So, I’m leaning towards option C.
KI
Kiley 12 months ago
I feel like the government-run social scoring tool is definitely high-risk, but I wonder if the chatbot could also fall under that category somehow.
EL
Elenor 1 year ago
I remember discussing how tools that affect employment decisions, like resume scanners, could also be high-risk, but I feel like they might not be as severe as social scoring.
LO
Lorenza 1 year ago
I think the social scoring tool might be considered high-risk because it directly impacts people's lives and freedoms, but I'm not entirely sure.
GW
Gwenn 1 year ago
I think the key here is identifying which application poses the greatest risk to individuals or society. A government social scoring tool sounds like it could have serious negative consequences, so I'm leaning towards that as the high-risk option.
DO
Dorathy 1 year ago
Okay, let's see. A resume scanning tool that ranks applicants could be considered high-risk since it's making important decisions about people's employment. But a government social scoring tool seems even more high-risk in terms of potential for abuse and harm.
HE
Hermila 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure on this one. I know the EU AI Act covers high-risk AI applications, but I'm not totally clear on the specifics. I'll have to think this through carefully.
LE
Lenna 1 year ago
I'm pretty sure the answer is C - a government-run social scoring tool. That seems like the most high-risk application under the EU AI Act.
DE
Delila 2 years ago
Ha! C) is the obvious choice. Imagine having your entire existence reduced to a number by the government. That's the stuff of nightmares!
AL
Alex 1 year ago
↳ replying to Delila
D) A customer service chatbot tool.
KA
Kathrine 1 year ago
↳ replying to Delila
C) A government-run social scoring tool.
JA
Jaclyn 1 year ago
↳ replying to Delila
B) An Al-enabled inventory management tool.
NO
Noelia 2 years ago
↳ replying to Delila
A) A resume scanning tool that ranks applicants.
CA
Carin 2 years ago
Hmm, I'd say C) is the clear winner here. Giving the government the power to score citizens? That's a recipe for dystopia!
BR
Brendan 1 year ago
↳ replying to Carin
Yeah, the idea of a government social scoring tool is pretty concerning.
ET
Ethan 1 year ago
↳ replying to Carin
I agree, C) is definitely a high-risk application.
RE
Ressie 2 years ago
C) A government-run social scoring tool. That's a no-brainer! Anything involving social scoring is bound to be high-risk.
FR
France 1 year ago
↳ replying to Ressie
B) An AI-enabled inventory management tool.
BR
Brittney 1 year ago
↳ replying to Ressie
D) A customer service chatbot tool.
GE
Gearldine 1 year ago
↳ replying to Ressie
A) A resume scanning tool that ranks applicants.
BE
Bettye 1 year ago
↳ replying to Ressie
C) A government-run social scoring tool. That's a no-brainer! Anything involving social scoring is bound to be high-risk.
IN
India 1 year ago
↳ replying to Ressie
B) An AI-enabled inventory management tool.
SH
Sheron 1 year ago
↳ replying to Ressie
D) A customer service chatbot tool.
ST
Stephaine 1 year ago
↳ replying to Ressie
A) A resume scanning tool that ranks applicants.
PE
Pearly 2 years ago
↳ replying to Ressie
C) A government-run social scoring tool. That's a no-brainer! Anything involving social scoring is bound to be high-risk.
TO
Tonette 2 years ago
I think B) An AI-enabled inventory management tool is low-risk compared to the other options.
TE
Tess 2 years ago
I believe A) A resume scanning tool can also be high-risk if not properly regulated.
GE
Georgeanna 2 years ago
I agree with Glenna, social scoring can lead to privacy concerns.
GL
Glenna 2 years ago
I think C) A government-run social scoring tool is high-risk.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel