Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

IAPP AIGP Exam - Topic 7 Question 19 Discussion

Posted by Cathern on Nov 13, 2024 at 01:13 AM

A company initially intended to use a large data set containing personal information to train an Al model. After consideration, the company determined that it can derive enough value from the data set without any personal information and permanently obfuscated all personal data elements before training the model.

This is an example of applying which privacy-enhancing technique (PET)?

Suggested Answer: A

Anonymization is a privacy-enhancing technique that involves removing or permanently altering personal data elements to prevent the identification of individuals. In this case, the company obfuscated all personal data elements before training the model, which aligns with the definition of anonymization. This ensures that the data cannot be traced back to individuals, thereby protecting their privacy while still allowing the company to derive value from the dataset. Reference: AIGP Body of Knowledge, privacy-enhancing techniques section.


Get Premium AIGP Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
34 comments · newest first
SA
Sabine 10 months ago
Are we sure they really obfuscated everything? Sounds risky.
NO
Noah 11 months ago
Anonymization is the right term here, no doubt.
AL
Allene 11 months ago
Surprised they didn't just go with differential privacy!
WE
Werner 11 months ago
I think it's more like pseudonymization.
AN
An 11 months ago
This is definitely anonymization!
MA
Margo 12 months ago
I’m confused because I thought differential privacy was also about protecting data, but this seems more straightforward with anonymization.
LO
Lovetta 12 months ago
I practiced a question similar to this, and I believe it was about anonymization too. It makes sense given that they obfuscated all personal info.
AS
Ashton 12 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about pseudonymization keeping some identifiers. This seems more like full anonymization.
ME
Meghan 1 year ago
I think this is about anonymization since they removed all personal data completely.
JE
Jennifer 1 year ago
I'm a little confused by the wording here. Federated learning is about distributed training, not anonymization. I'm leaning towards either anonymization or pseudonymization, but I'll have to re-read the question to be sure.
HE
Helaine 1 year ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The key detail is that the company "permanently obfuscated all personal data elements." That sounds like they're removing the personal identifiers, which is the definition of anonymization. I'm confident that's the right answer.
MI
Mira 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not totally sure about this one. Anonymization, pseudonymization, and differential privacy all seem like they could be relevant here. I'll have to think it through carefully.
JA
Jaime 1 year ago
This one seems pretty straightforward. The question is asking about a privacy-enhancing technique, and the details describe obfuscating personal data, which sounds like anonymization to me.
GI
Gilma 2 years ago
Haha, I bet the data scientists had a field day with 'obfuscating' all that personal info. Sounds like they were really 'anonymizing' the heck out of that data!
LA
Lai 2 years ago
↳ replying to Gilma
Federated learning might be useful for training models without sharing sensitive data.
EL
Elvera 2 years ago
↳ replying to Gilma
Differential privacy could have been another option to consider for enhancing privacy.
RO
Rosann 2 years ago
↳ replying to Gilma
I think they could have also used pseudonymization to protect the personal information.
FR
Frederica 2 years ago
↳ replying to Gilma
Yeah, they definitely went all out with anonymizing the data.
JU
Judy 2 years ago
I'm not sure, but I think it could also be B) Pseudonymization because the data was obfuscated.
JA
Jamika 2 years ago
I agree with Lorriane, anonymization is the best choice to protect personal data.
HU
Huey 2 years ago
Hmm, I'm not so sure. This sounds more like differential privacy to me, where they added noise to the data to preserve privacy while still deriving value.
LA
Laticia 2 years ago
↳ replying to Huey
C) Differential privacy.
MA
Mattie 2 years ago
↳ replying to Huey
B) Pseudonymization.
ME
Melodie 2 years ago
↳ replying to Huey
A) Anonymization.
GW
Gwenn 2 years ago
I'd say pseudonymization. Obfuscating the personal data elements but still keeping some linkability sounds like what they did here.
DO
Dominga 2 years ago
↳ replying to Gwenn
C) Differential privacy.
ST
Stephaine 2 years ago
↳ replying to Gwenn
B) Pseudonymization.
LA
Lamar 2 years ago
↳ replying to Gwenn
A) Anonymization.
LO
Lorriane 2 years ago
I think the answer is A) Anonymization.
GO
Goldie 2 years ago
Definitely anonymization. Removing all personal information from the data set before training the model is the textbook definition of anonymization.
AM
Amber 2 years ago
↳ replying to Goldie
Definitely anonymization.
CE
Celeste 2 years ago
↳ replying to Goldie
C) Differential privacy.
AM
Amie 2 years ago
↳ replying to Goldie
B) Pseudonymization.
TR
Trina 2 years ago
↳ replying to Goldie
A) Anonymization.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel