Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25

- Free Preparation Discussions

IAPP Exam AIGP Topic 5 Question 24 Discussion

Actual exam question for IAPP's AIGP exam

Question #: 24
Topic #: 5

[All AIGP Questions]

According to the EU Al Act, providers of what kind of machine learning systems will be required to register with an EU oversight agency before placing their systems in the EU market?

AAl systems that are harmful based on a legal risk-utility calculation.

BAl systems that are 'strong' general intelligence.

CAl systems trained on sensitive personal data.

DAl systems that are high-risk.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

Anonymization is a privacy-enhancing technique that involves removing or permanently altering personal data elements to prevent the identification of individuals. In this case, the company obfuscated all personal data elements before training the model, which aligns with the definition of anonymization. This ensures that the data cannot be traced back to individuals, thereby protecting their privacy while still allowing the company to derive value from the dataset. Reference: AIGP Body of Knowledge, privacy-enhancing techniques section.

by Gilbert at Mar 05, 2025, 11:55 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium AIGP Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Blondell

2 months ago

I was leaning towards A, but then I remembered the whole point of the EU AI Act is to focus on the risks, not some arbitrary 'legal risk-utility calculation'. Gotta be D.

upvoted 1 times

Vinnie

1 months ago

Definitely D, they want to regulate the high-risk AI systems in the EU market.

upvoted 0 times

...

Micaela

2 months ago

Yeah, I agree. The focus is on the risks associated with the AI systems.

upvoted 0 times

...

Levi

2 months ago

I think it's D, high-risk AI systems need to be registered with the EU oversight agency.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Azzie

3 months ago

Haha, 'strong' general intelligence? What does that even mean? I'm going with D, high-risk AI systems for sure.

upvoted 1 times

Adell

2 months ago

User 3: I'm also leaning towards D, high-risk AI systems. It seems like the most logical choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gennie

2 months ago

User 2: Yeah, D seems like the safest option to go with.

upvoted 0 times

...

Stevie

2 months ago

User 1: I agree, 'strong' general intelligence sounds vague. I think D, high-risk AI systems, makes more sense.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Shelton

3 months ago

I'm not sure, but I think C might be the right answer. Sensitive personal data is a big concern, so it makes sense that those AI systems would need to be registered.

upvoted 0 times

Wei

2 months ago

D) AI systems that are high-risk.

upvoted 0 times

...

Phyliss

2 months ago

I agree, protecting sensitive personal data is crucial.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leota

2 months ago

C) AI systems trained on sensitive personal data.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lennie

3 months ago

A) AI systems that are harmful based on a legal risk-utility calculation.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Benton

3 months ago

Option D seems like the correct answer here. The EU AI Act is all about regulating high-risk AI systems, so that makes the most sense.

upvoted 0 times

Tu

2 months ago

Yes, the EU AI Act is focused on ensuring that high-risk AI systems are properly overseen and regulated.

upvoted 0 times

...

Samuel

3 months ago

I agree, option D makes the most sense. High-risk AI systems need to be regulated.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Kaitlyn

3 months ago

But what about Al systems trained on sensitive personal data? Shouldn't they also be required to register?

upvoted 0 times

...

Katie

3 months ago

I agree with Lajuana, high-risk Al systems need to be registered with the EU oversight agency.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lajuana

3 months ago

I think the answer is D) Al systems that are high-risk.

upvoted 0 times

...