New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

IAPP AIGP Exam - Topic 5 Question 24 Discussion

Actual exam question for IAPP's AIGP exam
Question #: 24
Topic #: 5
[All AIGP Questions]

According to the EU Al Act, providers of what kind of machine learning systems will be required to register with an EU oversight agency before placing their systems in the EU market?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Anonymization is a privacy-enhancing technique that involves removing or permanently altering personal data elements to prevent the identification of individuals. In this case, the company obfuscated all personal data elements before training the model, which aligns with the definition of anonymization. This ensures that the data cannot be traced back to individuals, thereby protecting their privacy while still allowing the company to derive value from the dataset. Reference: AIGP Body of Knowledge, privacy-enhancing techniques section.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Larae
3 months ago
Strong general intelligence? That's a bit far-fetched!
upvoted 0 times
...
Aleisha
4 months ago
I heard it's about harmful systems too, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Paris
4 months ago
Wait, are they really going to regulate all high-risk systems?
upvoted 0 times
...
Osvaldo
4 months ago
Totally agree, safety first!
upvoted 0 times
...
Danica
4 months ago
I think it's high-risk AI systems that need registration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gail
5 months ago
I’m leaning towards option D, high-risk systems, since that seems to align with the regulatory focus on safety and compliance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kattie
5 months ago
I feel like it could also be related to systems trained on sensitive data, but I can't recall if that was specifically mentioned in the Act.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lauran
5 months ago
I remember practicing a question similar to this, and I think it was about AI systems that could pose legal risks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jose
5 months ago
I think it's about high-risk AI systems, but I'm not completely sure if that's the exact wording used in the EU AI Act.
upvoted 0 times
...
Linn
5 months ago
Ah, I think I've got it! The EU AI Act requires registration for AI systems that are considered high-risk. So the answer is D, AI systems that are high-risk.
upvoted 0 times
...
Velda
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused by this question. The options seem to cover different aspects of the EU AI Act, but I'm not sure which one is the most accurate. I'll have to re-read the relevant section in my study materials.
upvoted 0 times
...
Danica
5 months ago
Okay, let me see. I remember the EU AI Act focusing on regulating AI systems that pose potential risks. I believe the correct answer is D, AI systems that are high-risk.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jutta
5 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm not entirely sure about the details of the EU AI Act. I'll have to think this through carefully and review my notes before answering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Artie
5 months ago
I'm pretty confident I know the answer to this one. The EU AI Act requires registration for high-risk AI systems, so I think the correct answer is D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Blondell
10 months ago
I was leaning towards A, but then I remembered the whole point of the EU AI Act is to focus on the risks, not some arbitrary 'legal risk-utility calculation'. Gotta be D.
upvoted 1 times
Vinnie
9 months ago
Definitely D, they want to regulate the high-risk AI systems in the EU market.
upvoted 0 times
...
Micaela
9 months ago
Yeah, I agree. The focus is on the risks associated with the AI systems.
upvoted 0 times
...
Levi
9 months ago
I think it's D, high-risk AI systems need to be registered with the EU oversight agency.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Azzie
11 months ago
Haha, 'strong' general intelligence? What does that even mean? I'm going with D, high-risk AI systems for sure.
upvoted 1 times
Adell
10 months ago
User 3: I'm also leaning towards D, high-risk AI systems. It seems like the most logical choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gennie
10 months ago
User 2: Yeah, D seems like the safest option to go with.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stevie
10 months ago
User 1: I agree, 'strong' general intelligence sounds vague. I think D, high-risk AI systems, makes more sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Shelton
11 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think C might be the right answer. Sensitive personal data is a big concern, so it makes sense that those AI systems would need to be registered.
upvoted 0 times
Wei
10 months ago
D) AI systems that are high-risk.
upvoted 0 times
...
Phyliss
10 months ago
I agree, protecting sensitive personal data is crucial.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leota
10 months ago
C) AI systems trained on sensitive personal data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lennie
10 months ago
A) AI systems that are harmful based on a legal risk-utility calculation.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Benton
11 months ago
Option D seems like the correct answer here. The EU AI Act is all about regulating high-risk AI systems, so that makes the most sense.
upvoted 0 times
Tu
10 months ago
Yes, the EU AI Act is focused on ensuring that high-risk AI systems are properly overseen and regulated.
upvoted 0 times
...
Samuel
10 months ago
I agree, option D makes the most sense. High-risk AI systems need to be regulated.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kaitlyn
11 months ago
But what about Al systems trained on sensitive personal data? Shouldn't they also be required to register?
upvoted 0 times
...
Katie
11 months ago
I agree with Lajuana, high-risk Al systems need to be registered with the EU oversight agency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lajuana
11 months ago
I think the answer is D) Al systems that are high-risk.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel