Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

IAPP AIGP Exam - Topic 2 Question 23 Discussion

Posted by Alex on Feb 09, 2025 at 08:51 AM

CASE STUDY

Please use the following answer the next question:

XYZ Corp., a premier payroll services company that employs thousands of people globally, is embarking on a new hiring campaign and wants to implement policies and procedures to identify and retain the best talent. The new talent will help the company's product team expand its payroll offerings to companies in the healthcare and transportation sectors, including in Asia.

It has become time consuming and expensive for HR to review all resumes, and they are concerned that human reviewers might be susceptible to bias.

Address these concerns, the company is considering using a third-party Al tool to screen resumes and assist with hiring. They have been talking to several vendors about possibly obtaining a third-party Al-enabled hiring solution, as long as it would achieve its goals and comply with all applicable laws.

The organization has a large procurement team that is responsible for the contracting of technology solutions. One of the procurement team's goals is to reduce costs, and it often prefers lower-cost solutions. Others within the company are responsible for integrating and deploying technology solutions into the organization's operations in a responsible, cost-effective manner.

The organization is aware of the risks presented by Al hiring tools and wants to mitigate them. It also questions how best to organize and train its existing personnel to use the Al hiring tool responsibly. Their concerns are heightened by the fact that relevant laws vary across jurisdictions and continue to change.

Which of the following measures should XYZ adopt to best mitigate its risk of reputational harm from using the Al tool?

Suggested Answer: D

Model disgorgement is the technique used to remove the effects of improperly used data from an ML system. This process involves retraining or adjusting the model to eliminate any biases or inaccuracies introduced by the inappropriate data. It ensures that the model's outputs are not influenced by data that was not meant to be used or was used incorrectly. Reference: AIGP Body of Knowledge on Data Management and Model Integrity.


Get Premium AIGP Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
33 comments · newest first
DI
Dino 11 months ago
Manual screening is so outdated, we need to embrace tech!
IS
Isaiah 11 months ago
Choosing the cheapest option could backfire big time.
DE
Derick 12 months ago
Wait, can we really trust AI to be unbiased?
GE
Gerald 12 months ago
Totally agree, testing helps catch biases early.
HE
Helga 1 year ago
A testing phase for the AI tool is crucial!
PO
Pok 1 year ago
I think continuing to manually screen all applicants, like in option D, could defeat the purpose of using AI. But I wonder if it might help balance things out initially?
TA
Tasia 1 year ago
I feel like we practiced a similar question where cost-cutting led to issues down the line. Choosing the most economical option might not be the best approach, so I'm leaning away from option C.
CE
Celeste 1 year ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think just relying on the vendor to take responsibility for damages might not be enough. Option B feels risky to me.
AL
Aliza 1 year ago
I remember we discussed the importance of testing AI tools before and after deployment in class. It seems like option A could really help mitigate risks.
KR
Kris 1 year ago
Continuing to manually screen all applicants seems like it could be a lot of work. I'll need to carefully evaluate whether that's the best use of the company's resources.
KR
Kristal 1 year ago
Selecting the most economical AI tool might be tempting, but I'm not sure that's the best approach here. I'll need to think about the long-term implications of that choice.
PA
Paris 1 year ago
I'm a bit confused about the vendor responsibility piece. I'll need to read that one more closely to understand how it could help mitigate the risks.
DA
Danilo 1 year ago
Hmm, testing the AI tool before and after deployment sounds like a good idea to ensure it's working as intended. I'll make sure to consider that option.
CO
Colton 1 year ago
This seems like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully weigh the pros and cons of each option to determine the best approach to mitigate the risks.
GR
Graciela 1 year ago
I heard the procurement team is considering a 'deal of the century' on a used Speak & Spell as their AI tool. Gotta love that cost-effective approach!
FI
Fidelia 1 year ago
↳ replying to Graciela
D) Continue to require XYZ's hiring personnel to manually screen all applicants.
ME
Melda 1 year ago
↳ replying to Graciela
C) Direct the procurement team to select the most economical AI tool.
MA
Madelyn 1 year ago
↳ replying to Graciela
B) Ensure the vendor assumes responsibility for all damages.
XE
Xenia 1 year ago
↳ replying to Graciela
A) Test the AI tool pre- and post-deployment.
HU
Hubert 1 year ago
Option D? Really? Manual screening is super time-consuming and still susceptible to human bias. Might as well stick with carrier pigeons for hiring.
GL
Glenn 2 years ago
Hold up, option C is a terrible idea! Going for the cheapest AI tool could lead to disastrous results. Quality and ethics should be the priority, not cost-cutting.
SI
Silvana 1 year ago
↳ replying to Glenn
Hold up, option C is a terrible idea! Going for the cheapest AI tool could lead to disastrous results. Quality and ethics should be the priority, not cost-cutting.
AL
Alonso 1 year ago
↳ replying to Glenn
B) Ensure the vendor assumes responsibility for all damages.
NI
Nicolette 1 year ago
↳ replying to Glenn
A) Test the AI tool pre- and post-deployment.
LI
Lindsay 2 years ago
Option B sounds a bit too risky. The company should retain responsibility and oversight, not just pass the buck to the vendor. A more balanced approach is needed.
LA
Latanya 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lindsay
I agree, putting all the responsibility on the vendor could be risky. It's important for XYZ to have oversight.
LA
Lavonna 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lindsay
B) Ensure the vendor assumes responsibility for all damages.
HA
Haley 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lindsay
Option A seems like a good way to ensure the AI tool is working effectively.
DY
Dyan 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lindsay
A) Test the AI tool pre- and post-deployment.
AN
An 2 years ago
I think option A is the best approach. Thorough testing pre- and post-deployment is crucial to ensure the AI tool is fair and unbiased. We can't just take the vendor's word for it.
CE
Celestina 2 years ago
I think requiring XYZ's hiring personnel to manually screen all applicants is also important to avoid any potential biases that the Al tool may introduce.
AL
Aleta 2 years ago
I agree with Pearlene. Testing the Al tool is crucial to ensure it works effectively and doesn't harm the company's reputation.
PE
Pearlene 2 years ago
I think XYZ Corp. should test the Al tool pre- and post-deployment to mitigate risks.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel