U.S. Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

IAAP CPACC Exam - Topic 1 Question 56 Discussion

Which technique is MOST beneficial to blind and partially-sighted consumers of web and broadcast video content?
B) Captioning
A) Audio description
C) Sign language interpretation
D) Transcripts

IAAP CPACC Exam - Topic 1 Question 56 Discussion

Actual exam question for IAAP's CPACC exam
Question #: 56
Topic #: 1
[All CPACC Questions]

Which technique is MOST beneficial to blind and partially-sighted consumers of web and broadcast video content?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Gail at Aug 12, 2025, 04:31 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CPACC Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Ronny
6 months ago
Wait, are people really saying audio description is the best? I thought captions helped too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jarod
6 months ago
I think captioning is just as important for accessibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frankie
7 months ago
Audio description is crucial for blind users, no doubt about it!
upvoted 0 times
...
Becky
7 months ago
Transcripts are useful, but they don't replace audio description for visual content.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joana
7 months ago
Definitely audio description! It's a game changer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ivory
7 months ago
I’m leaning towards audio description too, but I’m a bit confused about how sign language interpretation fits into this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dan
7 months ago
I feel like audio description is definitely important, but I wonder if transcripts could also help blind users in some way?
upvoted 0 times
...
Frankie
8 months ago
I remember practicing a similar question, and I think captioning is more for the hearing impaired, so it might not be the best choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gwenn
8 months ago
I think audio description is the right answer since it provides context for visuals, but I'm not entirely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marva
8 months ago
Transcripts could be a good option too, as they provide a written record of the content. I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leanora
8 months ago
Sign language interpretation seems like it would be most useful for those who use sign language, but that might not cover all blind and partially-sighted users.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carylon
8 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. Captioning could also be really helpful for those with visual impairments, as it provides the text of the audio.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janna
9 months ago
I think the most beneficial technique would be audio description, since it provides an audio narration of the visual elements for blind and partially-sighted users.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel