Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

IAAP CPACC Exam - Topic 1 Question 56 Discussion

Which technique is MOST beneficial to blind and partially-sighted consumers of web and broadcast video content?
B) Captioning
A) Audio description
C) Sign language interpretation
D) Transcripts

IAAP CPACC Exam - Topic 1 Question 56 Discussion

Actual exam question for IAAP's CPACC exam
Question #: 56
Topic #: 1
[All CPACC Questions]

Which technique is MOST beneficial to blind and partially-sighted consumers of web and broadcast video content?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Gail at Aug 12, 2025, 04:31 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CPACC Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Ronny
8 months ago
Wait, are people really saying audio description is the best? I thought captions helped too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jarod
8 months ago
I think captioning is just as important for accessibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frankie
8 months ago
Audio description is crucial for blind users, no doubt about it!
upvoted 0 times
...
Becky
9 months ago
Transcripts are useful, but they don't replace audio description for visual content.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joana
9 months ago
Definitely audio description! It's a game changer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ivory
9 months ago
I’m leaning towards audio description too, but I’m a bit confused about how sign language interpretation fits into this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dan
9 months ago
I feel like audio description is definitely important, but I wonder if transcripts could also help blind users in some way?
upvoted 0 times
...
Frankie
10 months ago
I remember practicing a similar question, and I think captioning is more for the hearing impaired, so it might not be the best choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gwenn
10 months ago
I think audio description is the right answer since it provides context for visuals, but I'm not entirely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marva
10 months ago
Transcripts could be a good option too, as they provide a written record of the content. I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leanora
10 months ago
Sign language interpretation seems like it would be most useful for those who use sign language, but that might not cover all blind and partially-sighted users.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carylon
10 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. Captioning could also be really helpful for those with visual impairments, as it provides the text of the audio.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janna
10 months ago
I think the most beneficial technique would be audio description, since it provides an audio narration of the visual elements for blind and partially-sighted users.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel