Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Huawei H31-311_V2.5 Exam - Topic 1 Question 44 Discussion

Actual exam question for Huawei's H31-311_V2.5 exam
Question #: 44
Topic #: 1
[All H31-311_V2.5 Questions]

An unprotected chain consists of four net elements; ME1, NE2, NE3 and NE4.

Create an end-to-end VC4 path NE1-NE4 and add NE5 between NE2 and NE3 for capacity expansion.

The original configuration remains unchanged and no services are configured on the NE5.

In this case, the unprotected chain becomes NE1-NE2-NE5NE3-NE4, how many VC4 paths can be searched?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Jame at Apr 26, 2024, 12:30 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium H31-311_V2.5 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Carey
4 months ago
I agree with Dominque, 2 seems right!
upvoted 0 times
...
Devorah
5 months ago
Definitely 1 path, that's the standard.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denny
5 months ago
Wait, how can NE5 not affect the count?
upvoted 0 times
...
Eden
5 months ago
I think it's actually 3 paths.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominque
5 months ago
There are 2 VC4 paths in that chain.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emilio
6 months ago
I think the answer could be 2 paths because NE5 is in the chain but not actively used. It’s confusing though!
upvoted 0 times
...
Haley
6 months ago
I feel like I might be overthinking this. If NE5 is just for capacity and not in use, does that mean it doesn't contribute to the path count?
upvoted 0 times
...
Cary
6 months ago
This seems similar to a practice question we did where we had to count paths. I think it might be just 1 path since NE5 isn't configured with services.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominque
6 months ago
I remember we discussed how adding NE5 might affect the VC4 paths, but I'm not entirely sure how many can actually be searched.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shelba
6 months ago
I'm pretty confident I know the answer to this one. The question states that the unprotected chain becomes NE1-NE2-NE5-NE3-NE4, so the number of VC4 paths that can be searched is 3.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carolynn
6 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by the wording here. Let me re-read the question and try to visualize the network topology to see if I can figure this out.
upvoted 0 times
...
Loreta
6 months ago
This looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully think through the different path configurations to determine the correct number of VC4 paths.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marg
6 months ago
Okay, I think I've got it. Since the original configuration remains unchanged and NE5 is added between NE2 and NE3, there should be 2 possible VC4 paths.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alyce
6 months ago
Okay, I think I've got it. The key is that the improvements are described as "best described by" a problem-solving approach. That suggests we need to look at the overall approach, not just the individual changes. I'm leaning towards PDCA as the answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nickolas
6 months ago
Hmm, I think I'd go with option A. Getting stakeholders involved and asking for their feedback seems like a good way to get their attention and buy-in.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronny
6 months ago
The key is to reset the fishbucket for a single source, not the entire system. I'll go with option C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Niesha
11 months ago
This question is making my head spin like a top. Can we just skip it and move on to the next one? I need a break from all this networking mumbo-jumbo.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonora
11 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. If we have NE1-NE2-NE5-NE3-NE4, then the only possible end-to-end VC4 path would be the one that goes through all the elements, right? Gotta be B) 1.
upvoted 0 times
...
Latanya
11 months ago
Wait, does that mean I can't use NE5 to create any new paths? That's like building a new highway but not letting anyone drive on it. Talk about a waste of resources!
upvoted 0 times
Dusti
10 months ago
C) 2
upvoted 0 times
...
Belen
10 months ago
B) 1
upvoted 0 times
...
Minna
10 months ago
C) 2
upvoted 0 times
...
Adell
11 months ago
A) 0
upvoted 0 times
...
Johnna
11 months ago
B) 1
upvoted 0 times
...
Twana
11 months ago
A) 0
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Aleta
12 months ago
That makes sense, I see your point now. Thanks for explaining!
upvoted 0 times
...
Elza
12 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is C) 2 because we are adding NE5 for capacity expansion.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aleta
12 months ago
I think the answer is B) 1.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zack
12 months ago
Why do you think it's 2 paths, Shawana?
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawana
12 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is C) 2.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zack
12 months ago
I think the answer is B) 1.
upvoted 0 times
...
Troy
1 year ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm guessing the answer is B) 1 since the original configuration remains unchanged and the new NE5 element is not configured for any services.
upvoted 0 times
Alberto
11 months ago
Exactly, the answer is B) 1 in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valda
11 months ago
So, the unprotected chain becomes NE1-NE2-NE5-NE3-NE4 with only 1 VC4 path available.
upvoted 0 times
...
France
11 months ago
I agree, the original configuration remains unchanged so only 1 VC4 path can be searched.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annmarie
11 months ago
I think the answer is B) 1 because no services are configured on NE5.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel