Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Huawei H12-891_V1.0 Exam - Topic 5 Question 59 Discussion

Which of the following configurations for OSPFv3 route aggregation is correct?
A) [Huawei]ospf3 1 [Huawei-ospv3-1]area 1 [Huawei-ospf3-1-area-0001] abr-summary fo0:0 0:48 cost 400 and C) [Huawei] ospfs 1 [Huawei-ospf3-1] asbr-summary fcO0:O:0:.48 cost 20 tag 10o
B) [Huaweijinterface gigabitethernet 1/0/0[Huawei-GigabilEthemnet1 / 0/0] asbr-summany fcOO:0048 cost 20
D) Huawei]ospv3 1 [Huawe-ospt/3-1]area 1 Huawei-osph3-1-area-0001]asbr-summary fc000:048 cost 20 tag 100E. [Huawei] ospfv3 1 [Huawei-ospfv3-1] abr-summary fc000:0;. 48 cost 400

Huawei H12-891_V1.0 Exam - Topic 5 Question 59 Discussion

Actual exam question for Huawei's H12-891_V1.0 exam
Question #: 59
Topic #: 5
[All H12-891_V1.0 Questions]

Which of the following configurations for OSPFv3 route aggregation is correct?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, C, E

by Lynna at Dec 05, 2024, 05:44 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium H12-891_V1.0 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Kimberely
10 months ago
Wait, are we really using those cost values? Sounds weird!
upvoted 0 times
...
Magdalene
10 months ago
Totally agree with A, it just makes sense!
upvoted 0 times
...
Doretha
10 months ago
B seems off, cost should be higher for aggregation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Germaine
11 months ago
I think D has some typos, not sure it's valid.
upvoted 0 times
...
Theron
11 months ago
A looks like the most complete config.
upvoted 0 times
...
Val
11 months ago
I thought the tag values were important, but I'm confused about which option uses them correctly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rikki
11 months ago
I feel like I've seen something similar in our study materials, but I can't remember the specifics about the asbr-summary command.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malika
11 months ago
I think option A looks familiar, but I can't recall if the cost value is right for route aggregation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dong
12 months ago
I remember practicing OSPFv3 configurations, but I'm not entirely sure which one is correct here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margurite
12 months ago
I'm leaning towards option C. The ASBR summary configuration with the tag value looks familiar to me from previous OSPF configurations I've done. But I'll review the details carefully before submitting my answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jenelle
12 months ago
Option A looks close, but the cost value seems a bit high for an ABR summary route. I think option D is the way to go - the cost and tag values seem more reasonable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francine
12 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by the different options. The syntax seems a bit different across the choices. I'll need to double-check the OSPF configuration guide to make sure I understand the proper command structure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sylvie
12 months ago
I'm pretty sure the correct configuration is option D. The syntax looks right for configuring OSPF route aggregation on a Huawei device.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ivette
1 year ago
Wait, are we configuring OSPF or playing Tetris? These options are a real puzzle!
upvoted 0 times
Tuyet
1 year ago
C) Let's double-check the options to make sure we choose the correct one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fletcher
1 year ago
B) I think Option D might be the right configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodolfo
1 year ago
A) Option A looks correct to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Bulah
1 year ago
Option D is the way to go. The other options seem a bit too complicated or just plain wrong. Time to move on to the next question!
upvoted 0 times
Kristofer
1 year ago
Definitely, let's see what the next question has in store for us.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cassie
1 year ago
Yeah, the other options do seem a bit off. Let's move on to the next question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luisa
1 year ago
I agree, option D looks like the correct configuration for OSPFv3 route aggregation.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ilene
1 year ago
I'm going with Option D as well. It looks like the most complete and accurate configuration for OSPFv3 route aggregation.
upvoted 0 times
Edmond
1 year ago
I agree, Option D looks like the most complete and accurate configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alva
1 year ago
Option D seems to be the best choice for OSPFv3 route aggregation.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jame
1 year ago
Hmm, I see your point. But I still think option A) makes more sense based on the routing requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gracie
1 year ago
I'm not sure about this one. The syntax seems a bit odd, but Option D does seem to match the question best.
upvoted 0 times
...
Evette
1 year ago
Option D looks correct to me. The configuration shows the correct syntax for configuring ASBR summary routes in OSPFv3.
upvoted 0 times
Isabelle
1 year ago
Yes, option D is the correct configuration for OSPFv3 route aggregation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brittni
1 year ago
Option D seems to be the most accurate choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frankie
1 year ago
I agree, option D has the right syntax for ASBR summary routes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bonita
1 year ago
I think option D is the correct one.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Whitley
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe the correct configuration is D) [Huawei]ospv3 1 [Huawe-ospt/3-1]area 1 Huawei-osph3-1-area-0001]asbr-summary fc000:048 cost 20 tag 100.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jame
1 year ago
I think the correct configuration is A) [Huawei]ospf3 1 [Huawei-ospv3-1]area 1 [Huawei-ospf3-1-area-0001] abr-summary fo0:0 0:48 cost 400.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel