New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Huawei H12-891_V1.0 Exam - Topic 5 Question 59 Discussion

Actual exam question for Huawei's H12-891_V1.0 exam
Question #: 59
Topic #: 5
[All H12-891_V1.0 Questions]

Which of the following configurations for OSPFv3 route aggregation is correct?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, C, E

by Lynna at Dec 05, 2024, 05:44 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium H12-891_V1.0 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Kimberely
3 months ago
Wait, are we really using those cost values? Sounds weird!
upvoted 0 times
...
Magdalene
3 months ago
Totally agree with A, it just makes sense!
upvoted 0 times
...
Doretha
3 months ago
B seems off, cost should be higher for aggregation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Germaine
4 months ago
I think D has some typos, not sure it's valid.
upvoted 0 times
...
Theron
4 months ago
A looks like the most complete config.
upvoted 0 times
...
Val
4 months ago
I thought the tag values were important, but I'm confused about which option uses them correctly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rikki
4 months ago
I feel like I've seen something similar in our study materials, but I can't remember the specifics about the asbr-summary command.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malika
4 months ago
I think option A looks familiar, but I can't recall if the cost value is right for route aggregation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dong
5 months ago
I remember practicing OSPFv3 configurations, but I'm not entirely sure which one is correct here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margurite
5 months ago
I'm leaning towards option C. The ASBR summary configuration with the tag value looks familiar to me from previous OSPF configurations I've done. But I'll review the details carefully before submitting my answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jenelle
5 months ago
Option A looks close, but the cost value seems a bit high for an ABR summary route. I think option D is the way to go - the cost and tag values seem more reasonable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francine
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by the different options. The syntax seems a bit different across the choices. I'll need to double-check the OSPF configuration guide to make sure I understand the proper command structure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sylvie
5 months ago
I'm pretty sure the correct configuration is option D. The syntax looks right for configuring OSPF route aggregation on a Huawei device.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ivette
10 months ago
Wait, are we configuring OSPF or playing Tetris? These options are a real puzzle!
upvoted 0 times
Tuyet
9 months ago
C) Let's double-check the options to make sure we choose the correct one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fletcher
9 months ago
B) I think Option D might be the right configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodolfo
9 months ago
A) Option A looks correct to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Bulah
10 months ago
Option D is the way to go. The other options seem a bit too complicated or just plain wrong. Time to move on to the next question!
upvoted 0 times
Kristofer
9 months ago
Definitely, let's see what the next question has in store for us.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cassie
9 months ago
Yeah, the other options do seem a bit off. Let's move on to the next question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luisa
10 months ago
I agree, option D looks like the correct configuration for OSPFv3 route aggregation.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ilene
10 months ago
I'm going with Option D as well. It looks like the most complete and accurate configuration for OSPFv3 route aggregation.
upvoted 0 times
Edmond
9 months ago
I agree, Option D looks like the most complete and accurate configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alva
10 months ago
Option D seems to be the best choice for OSPFv3 route aggregation.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jame
11 months ago
Hmm, I see your point. But I still think option A) makes more sense based on the routing requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gracie
11 months ago
I'm not sure about this one. The syntax seems a bit odd, but Option D does seem to match the question best.
upvoted 0 times
...
Evette
11 months ago
Option D looks correct to me. The configuration shows the correct syntax for configuring ASBR summary routes in OSPFv3.
upvoted 0 times
Isabelle
9 months ago
Yes, option D is the correct configuration for OSPFv3 route aggregation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brittni
9 months ago
Option D seems to be the most accurate choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frankie
9 months ago
I agree, option D has the right syntax for ASBR summary routes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bonita
10 months ago
I think option D is the correct one.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Whitley
11 months ago
I disagree, I believe the correct configuration is D) [Huawei]ospv3 1 [Huawe-ospt/3-1]area 1 Huawei-osph3-1-area-0001]asbr-summary fc000:048 cost 20 tag 100.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jame
11 months ago
I think the correct configuration is A) [Huawei]ospf3 1 [Huawei-ospv3-1]area 1 [Huawei-ospf3-1-area-0001] abr-summary fo0:0 0:48 cost 400.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel