Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Huawei H12-891_V1.0 Exam - Topic 3 Question 51 Discussion

Actual exam question for Huawei's H12-891_V1.0 exam
Question #: 51
Topic #: 3
[All H12-891_V1.0 Questions]

The OSPF3 protocol is a separately developed protocol that differs somewhat from OSPF2 in that OSPFv3 is link-based rather than network segmented, and the following statement is incorrect?(). Single choice questions).

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, D

by Junita at Sep 11, 2024, 04:00 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium H12-891_V1.0 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Dulce
4 months ago
B is definitely true, I've seen it in action!
upvoted 0 times
...
Rolf
5 months ago
Wait, are we sure about D? That sounds too broad.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jamika
5 months ago
C seems a bit off to me, you usually need a unicast address.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nguyet
5 months ago
I think A is actually correct, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Gertude
5 months ago
OSPFv3 uses Link-Local addresses, that's a key difference!
upvoted 0 times
...
Timmy
6 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the neighbor relationship rules. I thought they needed matching prefixes, but maybe I’m mixing it up with OSPFv2.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gwenn
6 months ago
I feel like I read that all OSPFv3 messages use link-local addresses, so option D might be the one that's incorrect.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kanisha
6 months ago
I think option C sounds familiar from practice questions, but I can't recall if it's actually correct. It seems like they should need a unicast address.
upvoted 0 times
...
Omer
6 months ago
I remember that OSPFv3 uses link-local addresses for neighbor discovery, but I'm not sure if they can establish a relationship with different IPv6 prefixes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cordelia
6 months ago
I've got a good handle on OSPF protocols, so I feel pretty good about tackling this question. I'll just double-check my understanding of OSPF3 to be sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Goldie
6 months ago
The wording of this question is a bit tricky. I'll need to read it carefully and consider each option closely before selecting my answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Herminia
6 months ago
Okay, let's think this through step-by-step. OSPF3 is link-based, not network segmented, and the question is asking about an incorrect statement. I think I can narrow it down from there.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elenor
6 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused about the differences between OSPF2 and OSPF3. I'll need to review my notes to make sure I understand the key distinctions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Garry
6 months ago
This question seems pretty straightforward. I'm confident I can figure out the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reta
6 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. Importing schemas into WSDL can be tricky, and I want to make sure I understand the right approach. I'll need to re-read the question and think through the options carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rene
11 months ago
Wait, so we're supposed to know the difference between OSPF2 and OSPFv3? I thought this was a simple networking exam, not a secret handshake competition!
upvoted 0 times
Yong
10 months ago
D) All OSPFv3 interfaces use the Link-Local address as the destination address of the message
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerald
10 months ago
C) For two OSPF routers connected to the link, you can establish a neighbor relationship even if you do not configure a unicast IPv6 address
upvoted 0 times
...
Frederic
10 months ago
B) The routing information obtained by the OSPFv3 router from the neighbor uses the neighbor's Link-Local address as the next hop in the forwarded packet
upvoted 0 times
...
Eden
10 months ago
A) Two OSPF routers connected to the link can establish a neighbor relationship even if their IPv6 address prefixes are different
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jina
11 months ago
Ooh, this is a tough one. I think the correct answer is A. Two OSPF routers connected to the link can establish a neighbor relationship even if their IPv6 address prefixes are different. It's all about that link-local magic!
upvoted 0 times
...
Salena
11 months ago
Haha, this question is a real brainteaser! I'm going to guess C. For two OSPF routers connected to the link, you can establish a neighbor relationship even if you do not configure a unicast IPv6 address. Who needs addresses anyway?
upvoted 0 times
Virgina
10 months ago
User3: I agree with User1, A sounds correct to me too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jolene
10 months ago
User2: I'm going with B. The routing information obtained by the OSPFv3 router from the neighbor uses the neighbor's Link-Local address as the next hop in the forwarded packet.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margurite
10 months ago
User1: I think the answer is A. Two OSPF routers connected to the link can establish a neighbor relationship even if their IPv6 address prefixes are different.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Michell
11 months ago
I'm not sure about this one. Link-local addressing is pretty tricky in IPv6, so I'm going to go with B. The routing information obtained by the OSPFv3 router from the neighbor uses the neighbor's Link-Local address as the next hop.
upvoted 0 times
Alona
10 months ago
User 3: I'm not sure about this one, but B sounds logical. Link-local addressing can be tricky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jenelle
10 months ago
User 2: Yeah, I agree. It's important to understand how OSPFv3 handles routing information.
upvoted 0 times
...
Katie
11 months ago
User 1: I think B is correct. The routing information uses the neighbor's Link-Local address as the next hop.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Wenona
12 months ago
I think the correct answer is D. All OSPFv3 interfaces use the Link-Local address as the destination address of the message. This differs from OSPF2 where the address is network-based.
upvoted 0 times
Izetta
11 months ago
User 2: Yeah, OSPFv3 interfaces use the Link-Local address as the destination.
upvoted 0 times
...
Craig
11 months ago
User 1: I think the correct answer is D.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dorian
1 year ago
I'm not sure about that, I think the correct statement is C) For two OSPF routers connected to the link, you can establish a neighbor relationship even if you do not configure a unicast IPv6 address.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ernie
1 year ago
I agree with Frederica, because OSPFv3 is link-based and doesn't rely on network segmentation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frederica
1 year ago
I think the correct statement is A) Two OSPF routers connected to the link can establish a neighbor relationship even if their IPv6 address prefixes are different.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel