Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Huawei H12-891_V1.0 Exam - Topic 1 Question 41 Discussion

Actual exam question for Huawei's H12-891_V1.0 exam
Question #: 41
Topic #: 1
[All H12-891_V1.0 Questions]

R3 is not established with the RI's IS-IS neighbor, and according to the information in this figure, the possible cause is ?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Aliza at Apr 29, 2024, 06:58 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium H12-891_V1.0 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Desmond
4 months ago
Not sure about that, the circuit-type mismatch seems more likely.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pedro
5 months ago
Wait, could it really be that simple?
upvoted 0 times
...
Providencia
5 months ago
I think it might be the IS-Level mismatch instead.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rachael
5 months ago
Totally agree, that's a common issue!
upvoted 0 times
...
Brock
5 months ago
R3 duplicates the System ID of R1.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sabina
6 months ago
D seems incomplete, but I wonder if it could relate to some other configuration issue between R3 and R1.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashton
6 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like the circuit-type mismatch could be a factor too. Maybe C is worth considering?
upvoted 0 times
...
Barney
6 months ago
I think I saw a similar question about IS-Level mismatches in practice. Could B be the right answer?
upvoted 0 times
...
Chanel
6 months ago
I remember something about System IDs causing issues if they duplicate, so maybe A is a possibility?
upvoted 0 times
...
Blair
6 months ago
Okay, let me think this through step-by-step. The key information seems to be in the diagram, so I'll carefully analyze that and the answer choices to determine the most likely cause.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesus
6 months ago
Ah, I've seen this type of problem before. It's probably a mismatch in the circuit-type configuration between the interconnection ports on R3 and R1. I'll double-check that setting first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Trinidad
6 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The question mentions something about "lH authentication" which I'm not familiar with. I'll need to review my IS-IS troubleshooting notes to see if that's a common issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
German
6 months ago
This looks like a pretty straightforward IS-IS configuration issue. I'd carefully review the system IDs, IS-IS levels, and interface types to see if any of those are mismatched between R3 and R1.
upvoted 0 times
...
Galen
6 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The question mentions "attacker could misuse the application", so I'm thinking it might be related to abuse cases, but I'm not totally confident.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuki
6 months ago
I'm pretty sure RIP uses hop count to determine the least costly route, so I'll go with C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherrell
11 months ago
Obviously, the answer is D. R3 and R1 are just having a little lovers' quarrel, and they'll work it out eventually. I mean, who hasn't experienced a bit of IS-IS drama in their relationships, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Thurman
11 months ago
I'm going to have to agree with Leonie on this one. Mismatched IS-IS levels seem like the most likely culprit. Although, I did hear a rumor that R3 likes to dress up as R1 on the weekends, so option A can't be ruled out either.
upvoted 0 times
Kristel
10 months ago
Maybe R3 just wants to be R1 on the weekends, who knows!
upvoted 0 times
...
Elvera
10 months ago
True, the mismatched IS-IS levels could definitely be the cause.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sunny
10 months ago
But it could also be that R3 and R1 have mismatched IS-Level.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vinnie
10 months ago
I think the issue might be that R3 duplicates the System ID of R1.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Candida
12 months ago
Wait, doesn't the question mention something about an interconnection port circuit-type? I'm going to go with option C, just to be safe.
upvoted 0 times
Launa
10 months ago
Yeah, option C makes sense based on the information in the figure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vincenza
10 months ago
User1: Let's go with option C then, it seems like the most likely cause.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ty
10 months ago
User3: I agree with User2, it could be the interconnection ports circuit-type that's causing the problem.
upvoted 0 times
...
Georgene
11 months ago
I agree, let's go with option C for the possible cause.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gianna
11 months ago
User2: I believe the IS-Level of R3 is not matching with R1.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alishia
11 months ago
User1: I think the issue might be with the System ID of R3.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dulce
11 months ago
I think you're right, option C seems like the most likely cause.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Leonie
12 months ago
Hmm, I think it's got to be option B. If the IS-IS levels don't match, that could definitely cause the adjacency to fail. Time to brush up on my IS-IS fundamentals!
upvoted 0 times
...
Gregoria
12 months ago
I agree with Yoko, the mismatch in interconnection ports circuit-type could be causing the problem.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yoko
12 months ago
I believe the issue might be that R3 and R1 interconnection ports circuit-type do not match the lH authentication of.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carman
12 months ago
I think the possible cause is R3 duplicates the System ID of R1.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawn
1 year ago
I agree with Maryann, the mismatch in interconnection ports circuit-type could be causing the problem.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryann
1 year ago
I believe the issue might be that R3 and R1 interconnection ports circuit-type do not match the lH authentication of.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clarence
1 year ago
I think the possible cause is R3 duplicates the System ID of R1.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel