New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Huawei H12-351_V1.0 Exam - Topic 5 Question 40 Discussion

Actual exam question for Huawei's H12-351_V1.0 exam
Question #: 40
Topic #: 5
[All H12-351_V1.0 Questions]

When calculating the number of APs, you can divide the total required bandwidth by the maximum bandwidth of a single AP.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

When calculating the number of APs, you cannot simply divide the total required bandwidth by the maximum bandwidth of a single AP. You also need to consider other factors such as signal coverage area, user density, interference level, and application type.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Jesus
3 months ago
True, but you also need to consider user density!
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesusita
3 months ago
I thought it was more complicated than that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kris
3 months ago
Wait, is that really accurate for all scenarios?
upvoted 0 times
...
Bok
4 months ago
Totally agree, it's a straightforward method.
upvoted 0 times
...
Susana
4 months ago
That's how you calculate it!
upvoted 0 times
...
Felix
4 months ago
I believe it's true, but I can't recall if there are exceptions based on the environment or specific AP models.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorrine
4 months ago
I’m a bit confused; I thought we also had to account for user density and interference when calculating the number of APs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francine
4 months ago
I feel like I've seen similar questions, and they usually emphasize that the maximum bandwidth of a single AP is just one part of the equation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Coral
5 months ago
I think this is true because I remember calculating APs by dividing total bandwidth before, but I'm not entirely sure if there are other factors to consider.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ora
5 months ago
This is a straightforward calculation, but I want to double-check my work. Dividing the total by the max per AP sounds right, but I'll walk through it step-by-step to be sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Renea
5 months ago
I'm a little confused on this one. Is there something else I need to consider besides just the bandwidth numbers? I want to make sure I'm not missing anything.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bettina
5 months ago
Okay, I've got this. Dividing the total bandwidth by the max per AP will give me the number of APs required. Simple as that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rochell
5 months ago
Wait, is that really the right approach? I'm not sure if that's the full story here. I'll need to think this through a bit more carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thea
5 months ago
Hmm, this seems straightforward. I think I can just divide the total bandwidth by the max bandwidth per AP to get the number of APs needed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tammara
1 year ago
Ha, this question is a total joke. As if it's that easy to figure out the number of APs. I bet the answer is something crazy like 'it depends on your deployment scenario'.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annice
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. Dividing bandwidth by AP capacity sounds logical, but there's gotta be more to it. I better double-check my notes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Remedios
1 year ago
Hold up, that can't be right. Don't we need to factor in things like interference and coverage area? This question is trying to trick us.
upvoted 0 times
Golda
11 months ago
Yeah, I agree. It's not just about dividing the total required bandwidth by the maximum bandwidth of a single AP.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jose
12 months ago
I think you're right, we need to consider other factors like interference and coverage area.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chan
12 months ago
B) False
upvoted 0 times
...
Willard
1 year ago
A) True
upvoted 0 times
...
Rebbecca
1 year ago
B) False
upvoted 0 times
...
Lauran
1 year ago
A) True
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Pete
1 year ago
But if you divide the total required bandwidth by the maximum bandwidth of a single AP, you can determine the number of APs needed. So, I still think it's A) True.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dalene
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is B) False.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesus
1 year ago
Yep, that's the way to do it. Divide and conquer, right? Simple math, no brainer.
upvoted 0 times
Natalie
1 year ago
B) False
upvoted 0 times
...
Jillian
1 year ago
Exactly, divide and conquer. It's simple math.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jina
1 year ago
Divide and conquer, just like you said.
upvoted 0 times
...
Viola
1 year ago
True
upvoted 0 times
...
Talia
1 year ago
Exactly, it's a simple calculation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alton
1 year ago
A) True
upvoted 0 times
...
Kerry
1 year ago
A) True
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Pete
1 year ago
I think the answer is A) True.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel