Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

HRCI SPHR Exam - Topic 5 Question 96 Discussion

Posted by Edison on Dec 05, 2024 at 08:35 AM

As an HR Professional, you must sometimes terminate employees from your organization. When an employee is terminated, there must be a just cause or a good cause for the termination. Which one of the following is not a valid just cause for the employee's termination?

Suggested Answer: C

Answer option C is correct.

A Notice of Contest must be filed within 15 days of the citation. The OSH Act requires employers to allow the CSHO to inspect the workplace (D). Employers may request variances until repairs are made (A) or for processes that provide equal or greater safety for workers. Employers may consult with OSHA to identify possible hazards without fear of a citation or penalty (B); but once a consultant becomes involved, the employer must abate any violations, or the consultant will refer the violation to an OSHA inspector.

Chapter: Risk Management

Objective: Review Questions


Get Premium SPHR Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
32 comments · newest first
FR
Frederica 10 months ago
D seems off, that shouldn't be a factor at all.
AL
Alonzo 11 months ago
I think warnings should always come first.
AN
Annelle 11 months ago
Wait, are you saying being in a protected class isn't a valid reason?
RE
Rebecka 11 months ago
Totally agree, consistency is key!
HA
Harris 11 months ago
Just cause means you need proof of violation.
FL
Fletcher 12 months ago
I recall that consistency in applying rules is crucial, so I think it’s definitely not A, B, or C. D seems like the right choice since it touches on legal protections.
CA
Carolann 12 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the difference between just cause and good cause. I think all the other options relate to proper procedures, but I’m not confident about D.
RH
Rhea 12 months ago
I feel like I've seen a similar question before, and I think the answer might be D. It seems like being part of a protected class shouldn't be a reason for termination.
AM
Ammie 1 year ago
I remember studying about just cause and good cause, but I'm not entirely sure which option isn't valid. I think it might be related to discrimination laws?
LO
Lonna 1 year ago
This is a good test of my HR knowledge. I'll methodically go through the options and apply the principles of just cause.
TR
Truman 1 year ago
I'm feeling pretty confident about this one. The key is understanding the legal requirements for just cause termination.
ME
Merrilee 1 year ago
Okay, I think I know the answer here. The employee's membership in a protected class is not a valid just cause for termination.
AR
Arlette 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I'll have to review the key factors for valid just cause.
CA
Carolynn 1 year ago
This seems like a tricky question. I'll need to carefully consider the criteria for just cause termination.
LA
Lavera 1 year ago
Wait, so I can't fire someone just because they're part of the 'Wearing Mismatched Socks' protected class? Dang, there goes my whole termination strategy!
LO
Lorean 1 year ago
This is a textbook HR question. The correct answer has to be D - terminating someone for being in a protected class is a big no-no. Didn't they teach us that in HR 101?
NA
Natalie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lorean
C) Whether the rule has been applied consistently
GR
Gregoria 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lorean
B) Whether the employee was warned in advance
ED
Eden 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lorean
A) Whether reasonable 'proof' of the violation existed, or was obtained through investigation
DI
Dick 1 year ago
Hah, the 'employee is a member of a protected class' one got me chuckling. Nice try, HR exam writers, but I ain't falling for that one! Gotta go with D on this.
CL
Clemencia 1 year ago
↳ replying to Dick
C) Whether the rule has been applied consistently
LE
Lenita 1 year ago
↳ replying to Dick
B) Whether the employee was warned in advance
AN
Anglea 1 year ago
↳ replying to Dick
A) Whether reasonable 'proof' of the violation existed, or was obtained through investigation
RE
Remedios 1 year ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm leaning towards B as the not-valid just cause, since employers should always provide clear warnings before termination. But I could see the argument for D as well. Gotta be careful with those protected classes!
ST
Stephania 1 year ago
Option D really stands out as the odd one out here. Terminating an employee based on their protected class status is clearly not a valid just cause. This seems like a straightforward question.
WI
William 1 year ago
↳ replying to Stephania
D) Whether the employee is a member of a protected class
AM
Amalia 1 year ago
↳ replying to Stephania
C) Whether the rule has been applied consistently
SA
Sang 1 year ago
↳ replying to Stephania
B) Whether the employee was warned in advance
CY
Cyril 1 year ago
↳ replying to Stephania
A) Whether reasonable 'proof' of the violation existed, or was obtained through investigation
TA
Talia 1 year ago
I believe A) Whether reasonable 'proof' of the violation existed, or was obtained through investigation is also important to consider in termination decisions.
JO
Joanna 1 year ago
I agree with Shawna. It's important to treat all employees fairly regardless of their protected class status.
SH
Shawna 2 years ago
I think D) Whether the employee is a member of a protected class is not a valid just cause for termination.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel