Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

HRCI Exam SPHR Topic 4 Question 52 Discussion

Actual exam question for HRCI's SPHR exam
Question #: 52
Topic #: 4
[All SPHR Questions]

As an HR Professional you must be familiar with particular labor-based acts of congress. One such act is the Taft-Hartley Act which addressed right-to-work states and unions. What does right-to-work states mean for unions and employees?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Answer option A is correct.

Harris v. Forklift Systems Inc. was referenced in the case of same-sex harassment brought to the Supreme Court in Oncale v. Sundowner (D). Oncalehelped determine that gender is of little consequence when harassment meets the statutory requirements defined in Harris. Faragher v. City of Boca Raton (B) and Burlington Industries v. Ellerth (C) were also important cases aiding in interpreting the concept of sexual harassment in the workplace.

Chapter: Employee and Labor Relations

Objective: Review Questions


Contribute your Thoughts:

Lindsey
5 days ago
Wow, this is a tricky one! I heard that right-to-work states are like the Switzerland of the labor world - they're neutral ground where unions and employees can coexist peacefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Toi
7 days ago
Right-to-work states mean that employees have the freedom to choose whether or not to join a union. This is a fundamental principle of individual liberty.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adell
11 days ago
I believe that option A is correct because it allows employees to have more freedom in their decision to join a union.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ocie
12 days ago
I agree with Shaniqua, it gives employees the choice to join a union or not.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shaniqua
14 days ago
I think right-to-work states mean employees are not required to join a union to work.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel