Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

HRCI SPHR Exam - Topic 4 Question 52 Discussion

Posted by Ilene on Oct 28, 2022 at 11:40 AM

As an HR Professional you must be familiar with particular labor-based acts of congress. One such act is the Taft-Hartley Act which addressed right-to-work states and unions. What does right-to-work states mean for unions and employees?

Suggested Answer: A

Answer option A is correct.

Harris v. Forklift Systems Inc. was referenced in the case of same-sex harassment brought to the Supreme Court in Oncale v. Sundowner (D). Oncalehelped determine that gender is of little consequence when harassment meets the statutory requirements defined in Harris. Faragher v. City of Boca Raton (B) and Burlington Industries v. Ellerth (C) were also important cases aiding in interpreting the concept of sexual harassment in the workplace.

Chapter: Employee and Labor Relations

Objective: Review Questions


Get Premium SPHR Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
30 comments · newest first
HA
Harley 11 months ago
But unions provide so many benefits, why wouldn't you join?
RO
Rodolfo 11 months ago
Yep, it gives employees the choice to join or not.
AS
Ashlyn 12 months ago
Wait, so people can work without joining a union? That seems odd.
DA
Daniel 12 months ago
Totally disagree, unions are essential for worker rights.
UN
Una 12 months ago
Right-to-work means no mandatory union membership!
PU
Pura 1 year ago
I vaguely recall something about unions not being able to control hiring in right-to-work states, so I don't think option C is right either.
DA
Daron 1 year ago
I feel like option B is definitely wrong because right-to-work laws are all about not forcing union membership.
NI
Nickolas 1 year ago
I'm a bit unsure, but I think right-to-work states prevent mandatory union membership. It seems like a similar question came up in our practice tests.
LA
Laticia 1 year ago
I remember studying that right-to-work laws mean employees can choose whether or not to join a union, so I think option A is correct.
AN
Annmarie 1 year ago
Okay, let's see here. The integration test is working, so the issue must be with the fetching of incidents. I'm thinking it's either the 'Fetches Incidents' option not being enabled or the lack of new events from the external service.
BO
Bok 1 year ago
Okay, I've got this. The functions we want are the ones that will escape the HTML characters so they're displayed as text, not interpreted as code. I'm pretty confident B and D are the right answers here.
NI
Nickolas 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by this question. The command provided doesn't look quite right to me, and I'm not sure what the `--secure` flag is supposed to do. I'll need to research this a bit more before I can give a definitive answer. For now, I'll just make an educated guess and move on.
ME
Merilyn 1 year ago
Whew, this is a tough one. I'll need to weigh the pros and cons of each option to determine the BEST approach.
HE
Helaine 1 year ago
I think the right-to-work law is like a hall pass for employees - they can choose to join the union or just take a bathroom break instead.
MO
Moira 1 year ago
↳ replying to Helaine
D) An organization can fire employees if they're members of a union.
SH
Shanda 1 year ago
↳ replying to Helaine
That's right, it gives employees the choice to join or not.
LA
Lauran 1 year ago
↳ replying to Helaine
A) Employees are not required to join a union to work.
TR
Tran 1 year ago
Definitely option A. Employees should not be forced to join a union just to keep their job. That's like being forced to join a gym to use the treadmill!
LI
Lindsey 2 years ago
Wow, this is a tricky one! I heard that right-to-work states are like the Switzerland of the labor world - they're neutral ground where unions and employees can coexist peacefully.
HE
Heike 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lindsey
D) An organization can fire employees if they're members of a union.
MI
Miles 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lindsey
That's correct! Right-to-work states allow employees the choice to join a union or not.
AN
Annamaria 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lindsey
A) Employees are not required to join a union to work.
TO
Toi 2 years ago
Right-to-work states mean that employees have the freedom to choose whether or not to join a union. This is a fundamental principle of individual liberty.
CI
Ciara 1 year ago
↳ replying to Toi
Actually, in right-to-work states, unions do not have control over hiring.
LO
Lorita 1 year ago
↳ replying to Toi
C) Union conducts the hiring process for an organization.
KE
Kerry 1 year ago
↳ replying to Toi
That's right, it gives employees the choice to join or not.
TA
Tasia 1 year ago
↳ replying to Toi
A) Employees are not required to join a union to work.
AD
Adell 2 years ago
I believe that option A is correct because it allows employees to have more freedom in their decision to join a union.
OC
Ocie 2 years ago
I agree with Shaniqua, it gives employees the choice to join a union or not.
SH
Shaniqua 2 years ago
I think right-to-work states mean employees are not required to join a union to work.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel