Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

HRCI SPHR Exam - Topic 3 Question 116 Discussion

Actual exam question for HRCI's SPHR exam
Question #: 116
Topic #: 3
[All SPHR Questions]

What is the best strategy for an organization with a high percentage of retirement-eligible leaders?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

The best strategy for an organization facing a high percentage of retirement-eligible leaders is to develop internal leadership capabilities (B). At the SPHR level, this scenario represents a succession risk that must be addressed proactively to ensure continuity, stability, and long-term performance.

Developing internal leadership capability allows organizations to create a sustainable leadership pipeline, preserve institutional knowledge, and ensure cultural continuity. Leadership development, succession planning, and targeted development assignments prepare high-potential employees to assume leadership roles as vacancies occur.

Rehiring retirees as consultants (A) may provide short-term continuity but does not address long-term leadership needs. Executive retention packages (C) may delay retirements but are costly and only temporary solutions. Hiring externally (D) can fill gaps but increases risk, cost, and cultural disruption if overused.

SPHR exam content emphasizes that organizations must anticipate leadership transitions and invest in internal talent development as the most effective and strategic response to demographic risk.


HRCI SPHR Exam Content Outline --- Functional Area: Leadership and Strategy (succession planning; leadership development).

HRCI SPHR Study Guide --- Managing leadership continuity and retirement risk.

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
William
18 days ago
I disagree, A could save costs and keep experience.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tiera
23 days ago
B is the way to go! Internal talent is key.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louvenia
1 month ago
I'm torn between building retention packages and hiring externally. Both have their pros and cons, but I can't recall which one we favored in our study group.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kent
1 month ago
I feel like we practiced a similar question, and I leaned towards developing internal capabilities. It seems like a solid strategy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elenor
2 months ago
I think rehiring leaders as contractors could be a quick fix, but it might not be sustainable long-term.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dante
2 months ago
I remember discussing the importance of internal leadership development in class, but I'm not sure if that's the best option here.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel