Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

HRCI SPHR Exam - Topic 2 Question 95 Discussion

Posted by Emelda on Nov 14, 2024 at 12:06 AM

Please refer to the following table for this question. A company advertised for 100 sales representative positions. They received 650 applications and hired the 100 employees as follows:

In which groups has adverse impact occurred?

Suggested Answer: B

Answer option B is correct.

A company cannot threaten employees or make promises to them contingent on the workforce remaining union free. A philosophy statement should be geared toward communicating the company's desire to work directly with the employees in discussions about working conditions or benefits. If a union does attempt to organize, it is important for the employer to work directly with outside council to determine the strategic benefits of discussing the desire to remain union free and the disadvantages/limitations of unions as employee representatives.

Chapter: Employee and Labor Relations

Objective: Review Questions


Get Premium SPHR Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
37 comments · newest first
ER
Erinn 10 months ago
Definitely seems unfair for the Black applicants.
KI
Kip 11 months ago
I think it's Hispanic and Native American, not sure though.
EL
Elenore 11 months ago
Wait, how did they get 650 applications but only hire 100?
RE
Ressie 11 months ago
Totally agree, those numbers don't lie!
AR
Armando 11 months ago
Looks like adverse impact is with Black and Caucasian.
AL
Alyce 12 months ago
I recall that adverse impact usually affects minority groups, but I can't quite remember which combinations are most common. I hope I can figure it out!
PE
Peggy 12 months ago
I’m a bit confused about how to calculate the impact ratios for each group. I hope I can remember the formulas during the exam.
FR
Frederica 12 months ago
I think I practiced a similar question where we had to identify groups with lower hiring rates. I feel like it might be the Hispanic and Native American group here.
EV
Eva 1 year ago
I remember studying adverse impact and the 4/5ths rule, but I'm not sure how to apply it here with these specific groups.
MA
Malcolm 1 year ago
This is a classic adverse impact question. I'll start by calculating the selection rate for each group, then compare them to see if any fall below 80% of the highest rate. That should point me to the groups with adverse impact.
FI
Filiberto 1 year ago
I'm feeling a little lost on this one. There are a lot of different groups to compare, and I'm not confident I remember the right way to identify adverse impact. Maybe I should try a practice question or two before attempting this.
ST
Stephaine 1 year ago
Okay, I've got this. I just need to look at the selection rates for each group and see if any of them fall below the 80% rule. That will tell me where the adverse impact is occurring.
DA
Dannie 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about how to approach this. I know adverse impact has to do with disproportionate hiring, but I'm not sure exactly how to determine which groups are affected. I'll need to review my notes on this topic.
CA
Carlton 1 year ago
This looks like a straightforward adverse impact analysis question. I'll need to calculate the selection rates for each group and compare them to identify any significant differences.
BL
Blondell 1 year ago
A, B, C, or D? I feel like I need a crystal ball to figure this out. Maybe they should just hire based on skills, not skin color.
ME
Merilyn 1 year ago
↳ replying to Blondell
B) Hispanic and Caucasian
SC
Scot 1 year ago
↳ replying to Blondell
I agree, hiring should be based on skills and qualifications, not skin color.
BE
Bette 1 year ago
↳ replying to Blondell
A) Caucasian and Black
LA
Laquanda 1 year ago
Oof, this is a tough one. I'm leaning towards D, but I'm just hoping they don't get sued for this mess.
MU
Murray 1 year ago
↳ replying to Laquanda
Definitely, they could be at risk for a discrimination lawsuit.
KE
Keneth 1 year ago
↳ replying to Laquanda
Yeah, it looks like there's a disparity there. They might need to review their hiring process.
MA
Martina 1 year ago
↳ replying to Laquanda
I think it's D too, the numbers seem off.
VE
Verlene 1 year ago
↳ replying to Laquanda
D) Hispanic and Native American
MA
Marget 1 year ago
↳ replying to Laquanda
C) Native American and Black
CA
Carman 1 year ago
↳ replying to Laquanda
B) Hispanic and Caucasian
ME
Melita 1 year ago
↳ replying to Laquanda
A) Caucasian and Black
DA
Dannette 1 year ago
Wait, are they trying to trick us? I bet it's B - gotta keep those Hispanics down, right? *sarcasm dripping*
CA
Carry 1 year ago
↳ replying to Dannette
D) Hispanic and Native American
FR
Frank 1 year ago
↳ replying to Dannette
C) Native American and Black
YV
Yvette 1 year ago
↳ replying to Dannette
B) Hispanic and Caucasian
RO
Rodolfo 1 year ago
↳ replying to Dannette
A) Caucasian and Black
AN
An 1 year ago
I believe the correct answer is A) Caucasian and Black, as the hiring rates for these groups are not proportionate to their application rates.
BR
Brittni 1 year ago
Hmm, looks like the company has some diversity issues. I'm guessing C is the correct answer, but I hope they learn from this.
FL
Florinda 1 year ago
↳ replying to Brittni
B) Hispanic and Caucasian
JE
Jennifer 1 year ago
↳ replying to Brittni
A) Caucasian and Black
JO
Josue 1 year ago
I agree with Miss, the data shows that there is a significant difference in hiring rates between Caucasians and Blacks, as well as Hispanics and Caucasians.
MI
Miss 2 years ago
I think adverse impact occurred in groups A and B.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel