New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

HRCI PHR Exam - Topic 4 Question 53 Discussion

Actual exam question for HRCI's PHR exam
Question #: 53
Topic #: 4
[All PHR Questions]

Which of the following types of training evolution measures whether the training had a positive impact on the bottom line?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

The result measures whether the training had a positive impact on the bottom line.

Answer option B is incorrect. Reaction measures immediate feedback of the training.

Answer option C is incorrect. Learning measures what was learned through testing.

Answer option D is incorrect. Behavior measures job performance of six months or more after training.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Carlee
4 months ago
Wait, can training really affect the bottom line that much?
upvoted 0 times
...
Annamae
4 months ago
Really? I thought it was about behavior changes, not just results.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elliott
4 months ago
A is the right choice, no doubt about it!
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosann
4 months ago
I think B - Reaction is more about feelings, not impact.
upvoted 0 times
...
Florencia
4 months ago
It's definitely A - Result!
upvoted 0 times
...
Desmond
5 months ago
I vaguely recall a practice question where we had to differentiate between Learning and Result, and I think Result was the one linked to financial outcomes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delmy
5 months ago
I feel like Behavior could also be relevant, but it seems more about how people apply what they learned rather than direct financial results.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marta
5 months ago
I'm not so sure, but I remember we discussed Reaction and how it measures immediate feedback, not really the financial impact.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ernest
5 months ago
I think the answer might be A, Result, since it focuses on the impact on the bottom line.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mattie
5 months ago
This is a tricky one. On one hand, the technical changes seem low effort, but on the other hand, the stakeholders' request for tiered pricing and discount schedules could be a more complex integration. I'd lean towards option B, but I'd want to double-check the feasibility with the team first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annamae
5 months ago
I like option C - stakeholders should be able to use the test conditions to establish traceability back to the requirements. That way, they can see how the testing is covering the specified functionality.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherell
5 months ago
Okay, let's see. The gearing ratio increased from 35% to 45%, so that means the proportion of debt to equity has gone up. I'm guessing the answer has to do with taking on more debt.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel