MENU
Which of the following types of training evolution measures whether the training had a positive impact on the bottom line?
Suggested Answer: A
Get Premium PHR Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
The result measures whether the training had a positive impact on the bottom line.
Answer option B is incorrect. Reaction measures immediate feedback of the training.
Answer option C is incorrect. Learning measures what was learned through testing.
Answer option D is incorrect. Behavior measures job performance of six months or more after training.
12 comments · newest first
CA
Carlee
11 months ago
Wait, can training really affect the bottom line that much?
AN
Annamae
11 months ago
Really? I thought it was about behavior changes, not just results.
EL
Elliott
12 months ago
A is the right choice, no doubt about it!
RO
Rosann
12 months ago
I think B - Reaction is more about feelings, not impact.
FL
Florencia
12 months ago
It's definitely A - Result!
DE
Desmond
1 year ago
I vaguely recall a practice question where we had to differentiate between Learning and Result, and I think Result was the one linked to financial outcomes.
DE
Delmy
1 year ago
I feel like Behavior could also be relevant, but it seems more about how people apply what they learned rather than direct financial results.
MA
Marta
1 year ago
I'm not so sure, but I remember we discussed Reaction and how it measures immediate feedback, not really the financial impact.
ER
Ernest
1 year ago
I think the answer might be A, Result, since it focuses on the impact on the bottom line.
MA
Mattie
1 year ago
This is a tricky one. On one hand, the technical changes seem low effort, but on the other hand, the stakeholders' request for tiered pricing and discount schedules could be a more complex integration. I'd lean towards option B, but I'd want to double-check the feasibility with the team first.
AN
Annamae
1 year ago
I like option C - stakeholders should be able to use the test conditions to establish traceability back to the requirements. That way, they can see how the testing is covering the specified functionality.
SH
Sherell
1 year ago
Okay, let's see. The gearing ratio increased from 35% to 45%, so that means the proportion of debt to equity has gone up. I'm guessing the answer has to do with taking on more debt.