Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

HRCI PHR Exam - Topic 1 Question 2 Discussion

Kelly's organization has posted a new job opening for their organization. This job opening is for a woman to be the restroom attended, for all women's restrooms and locker rooms, in their organization. Kelly believes, however, that the requirement for the applicant to be a female is a violation of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Which one of the following is the best answer for this scenario?
A) This is an example of an exception by bona fide occupational qualification to the Title VII of the
B) This is an example of a violation of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964
C) The sex of applicants is excluded from the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964
D) This is not a violation of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 because there is an equal

HRCI PHR Exam - Topic 1 Question 2 Discussion

Actual exam question for HRCI's PHR exam
Question #: 2
Topic #: 1
[All PHR Questions]

Kelly's organization has posted a new job opening for their organization. This job opening is for a woman to be the restroom attended, for all women's restrooms and locker rooms, in their organization. Kelly believes, however, that the requirement for the applicant to be a female is a violation of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Which one of the following is the best answer for this scenario?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

This is an example of a bona fide occupational qualification for the position because of the nature of the job and type of employee, female, that is needed in this instance.

Answer option C is incorrect. The sex of applicants is not excluded from the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

Answer option B is incorrect. This is not a violation of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 because some jobs may have an unintended discriminatory basis.

Answer option D is incorrect. The existence of a similar job for men or women does not automatically create exclusion to the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.


by Alyce at May 08, 2022, 04:50 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PHR Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Jettie
8 months ago
Title VII should protect everyone, regardless of gender!
upvoted 0 times
...
An
9 months ago
Wait, is it really okay to hire only women for this role?
upvoted 0 times
...
Tashia
9 months ago
It's a classic case of bona fide occupational qualification.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maile
9 months ago
I disagree, it feels discriminatory.
upvoted 0 times
...
In
9 months ago
This job is specifically for women, so it makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cristy
9 months ago
I think we had a similar practice question about gender-specific roles. I wonder if the answer is the same here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lewis
9 months ago
This seems like a violation of Title VII to me, especially since it discriminates based on sex.
upvoted 0 times
...
Susana
9 months ago
I remember discussing bona fide occupational qualifications in class, but I'm not entirely sure how they apply here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Florinda
9 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the exceptions to Title VII. Could this be justified as necessary for privacy reasons?
upvoted 0 times
...
Mari
9 months ago
This seems like a straightforward operating leverage question. If the selling price per unit rises and all other variables remain constant, the operating break-even point in units should fall.
upvoted 0 times
...
Julene
9 months ago
Hmm, I'm a little unsure about the differences between the various types of water mentioned here. I'll need to think this through and make sure I understand the key distinctions before selecting an answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isadora
9 months ago
The question mentions that SSL offloading is required, so I'm thinking the clientssl profile is the way to go. And since we need to ensure persistence, the http cookie persistence option seems like the best fit.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel