MENU
Which of the following is a measure of recruiting effectiveness in the long term?
Suggested Answer: D
Get Premium GPHR Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
11 comments · newest first
TH
Thaddeus
11 months ago
Surprised that average time isn't mentioned more often!
PA
Paris
12 months ago
Totally agree with turnover being crucial!
HO
Hobert
12 months ago
Wait, isn't quantity of applicants important too?
JU
Justine
12 months ago
I think cost per applicant hired matters more.
FE
Felton
1 year ago
Turnover of hires is a key long-term measure!
LA
Latosha
1 year ago
Quantity of applicants seems off for long-term effectiveness; I think we looked at similar questions where quality mattered more.
TA
Tawna
1 year ago
I feel like average time required to recruit applicants could be relevant, but it doesn't really capture effectiveness over the long term.
LU
Lucy
1 year ago
I'm not sure, but I remember discussing cost per applicant hired in class. It seems more focused on short-term metrics.
SU
Suzan
1 year ago
I think turnover of hires might be the right answer since it reflects how well the recruitment process aligns with long-term needs.
LO
Lorrine
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not too sure about this one. I'll need to think it through carefully. Maybe the Citrix Diagnostic Facility (CDF) tools could be useful here?
CA
Catrice
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by the different options here. I'm not sure if I should be using "input" or "read" to get the character. And what's the difference between "s.input(1)" and "input(s, 1)"? I'll need to think this through carefully.