MENU
Which of the following would a trainer emphasize in order to ensure that a training program focused on developing skills for a particular job is valid?
Suggested Answer: B
Get Premium GPHR Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
27 comments · newest first
LE
Leonardo
10 months ago
A is just comparing, not really valid for specific skills.
ED
Edison
11 months ago
Totally agree with D, job specs tell you everything!
JO
Joaquin
11 months ago
Wait, are we sure interviewing managers is enough? Seems a bit off.
ED
Eden
11 months ago
I think B is super important too, gotta know what the current employees think.
FE
Felix
11 months ago
Definitely D, analyzing the job description is key!
PH
Phyliss
12 months ago
I think comparing off-the-shelf programs might help, but I’m leaning towards the job analysis as the most critical step for validity.
AL
Alishia
12 months ago
I feel like interviewing managers could provide valuable context, but I can't recall if it directly relates to the validity of the training program.
NA
Nadine
12 months ago
I remember practicing a question about interviewing incumbents, and it seemed like a good way to gather insights, but I wonder if it’s enough on its own.
CH
Cherri
1 year ago
I think analyzing the job description and specifications is really important for ensuring the training program is valid, but I'm not entirely sure if it's the only factor.
LU
Luis
1 year ago
This is a tricky one. I'm torn between a few options, like interviewing incumbents and managers. But I think analyzing the job description and specs is probably the best way to validate the training program. I'll go with that.
NE
Nelida
1 year ago
Okay, I've got a strategy for this. I'll focus on the core objective of ensuring the training program is valid and aligned with the job requirements. Analyzing the job description and specs seems like the most direct way to do that.
AS
Ashanti
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I think interviewing incumbents and managers could also be important to get their perspectives on the necessary skills. Maybe I'll try to eliminate some of the options first before making a final decision.
ER
Erasmo
1 year ago
This seems like a straightforward question about validating a training program. I'd start by analyzing the job description and specifications to understand the key skills and knowledge required for the role.
OL
Olive
1 year ago
If the trainer doesn't interview the incumbent, how will they know the real scoop? Gotta get that insider intel, am I right?
JE
Jerilyn
1 year ago
C) Interview managers
SE
Serita
1 year ago
C) Interview managers
TI
Tiffiny
1 year ago
B) Interview incumbent
KA
Karol
1 year ago
B) Interview incumbent
JO
Josphine
1 year ago
A) Survey comparable off-the-shelf programs
YA
Yan
1 year ago
A) Survey comparable off-the-shelf programs
WI
Winfred
1 year ago
Analyzing the job description and specs? Sounds like the trainer is doing their homework. That's the way to go!
JE
Jerry
1 year ago
Hah, surveying off-the-shelf programs? What is this, a one-size-fits-all kind of deal? Nah, gotta go with the job description for sure.
CH
Cheryl
1 year ago
Interviewing both the incumbent and the managers seems like a solid approach. Gotta get that insider perspective!
AV
Avery
1 year ago
I think the job analysis is key to ensuring the training program is valid. Gotta make sure it's tailored to the actual job requirements.
MO
Mozell
2 years ago
I think interviewing managers could also provide valuable insights into what skills are needed for the job.
GE
Gertude
2 years ago
I agree with Shanice. It's important to make sure the training program aligns with the specific job requirements.
SH
Shanice
2 years ago
I think the trainer would emphasize analyzing the job description and job specifications.