Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

HRCI aPHRi Exam - Topic 1 Question 16 Discussion

Posted by Ocie on Apr 09, 2026 at 06:53 AM

Managers write descriptions about an employee's performance using the:

Suggested Answer: B

Comprehensive and Detailed in Depth

The narrative method of performance appraisal involves managers writing detailed, descriptive accounts of an employee's performance, often in essay or paragraph form. This method focuses on providing qualitative feedback about the employee's strengths, weaknesses, and overall contributions.

Option A (Rating method): This involves assigning numerical or categorical ratings (e.g., 1-5) to performance criteria, not writing descriptions.

Option B (Narrative method): Correct, as this method specifically involves writing descriptive accounts of performance.

Option C (Comparison method): This involves ranking employees against each other (e.g., forced ranking), not writing descriptions.

Option D (Critical incident method): This method focuses on documenting specific events (incidents) that exemplify good or poor performance, not a general descriptive account.


===========

Get Premium aPHRi Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
26 comments · newest first
RO
Rodney 7 days ago
I feel C) Comparison method can be unfair. Everyone is unique!
SH
Shasta 12 days ago
D) Critical incident method seems useful for specific examples.
RO
Roselle 17 days ago
True, Mike, but ratings can be too vague sometimes.
VA
Valentine 22 days ago
But what about A) Rating method? It's straightforward and quick.
KA
Karrie 28 days ago
I agree, Alex. A narrative gives context to performance.
AV
Avery 1 month ago
I think it's B) Narrative method. It feels more personal.
TH
Thaddeus 1 month ago
Rating method is too limiting. It doesn't capture nuances.
BE
Ben 1 month ago
I feel like the narrative method allows for more detail.
AN
Annett 2 months ago
Critical incident method is useful for specific examples.
KI
Kiley 2 months ago
Comparison method can be unfair. Everyone has different strengths.
EL
Ellen 2 months ago
I prefer the rating method. It's straightforward and quick.
TE
Tegan 2 months ago
I think the narrative method is the best. It gives a full picture.
TR
Trinidad 2 months ago
I agree, narrative method seems the most common.
FL
Floyd 2 months ago
Wait, is the critical incident method really a thing?
PA
Paris 3 months ago
I always thought it was the rating method.
KR
Kristian 3 months ago
Definitely not the comparison method!
JU
Juan 3 months ago
I think it's the narrative method.
KR
Krissy 3 months ago
I thought C) Comparison method was the standard!
RE
Reyes 3 months ago
Wait, are we sure it's not D) Critical incident method? Sounds more accurate.
MA
Malinda 4 months ago
I always use A) Rating method, it's simpler.
LI
Lindsey 5 months ago
Totally agree, the narrative method gives more detail!
BE
Bea 5 months ago
I think it's B) Narrative method.
DE
Delfina 6 months ago
I might be mixing things up, but I thought the rating method involved scoring employees on a scale, which seems different from writing descriptions.
LE
Leota 6 months ago
I feel like the critical incident method focuses on specific examples of behavior, but I can't recall if that's the right answer here.
AR
Arlene 6 months ago
I remember practicing a question about performance appraisal methods, and I think the comparison method was about comparing employees against each other.
QU
Quentin 6 months ago
I think the narrative method is the one where managers write detailed descriptions, but I'm not entirely sure.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel