Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

HP Exam HPE7-A07 Topic 1 Question 28 Discussion

Actual exam question for HP's HPE7-A07 exam
Question #: 28
Topic #: 1
[All HPE7-A07 Questions]

The ACME company has an AOS-CX 6200 switch stack with an uplink oversubscription ratio of 9.6:1. They are considering adding two more nodes to the stack without adding any additional uplinks due to cabling constraints One of their architects has expressed concerns that their critical UDP traffic from both wired and bridged AP clients will encounter packet drops. They have already applied the following configuration:

Which strategy will complement this solution to achieve their objective?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, E

When troubleshooting a WLAN with 802.1X tunneled SSID issues, AP tunnel states indicate the status of the connection between the AP and the gateway/controller. The states 'SM_STATE_REKEYING' and 'SM_STATE_CONNECTING' could indicate transitional states where the connection has not been fully established, hence users might face issues connecting to the SSID. 'SM_STATE_REKEYING' implies that the AP is in the process of re-establishing encryption keys, while 'SM_STATE_CONNECTING' indicates that the AP is trying to establish a connection with the controller or gateway. These states could lead to temporary connectivity issues until the state transitions to 'SM_STATE_CONNECTED'.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Micaela
21 days ago
Hmm, I wonder if they have any 'mission critical' UDP traffic that requires even higher priority, like voice or video? Maybe AF42 would be a better choice than just plain old CS.
upvoted 0 times
...
Estrella
22 days ago
Option B all the way! Gotta protect that critical UDP traffic. Can't have those packets dropping, that would be a disaster!
upvoted 0 times
Yuette
1 days ago
User 2: Agreed, can't risk those packets dropping.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adell
2 days ago
User 1: Option B all the way! Gotta protect that critical UDP traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Beata
26 days ago
Definitely going with option B. Marking the UDP traffic as high priority is the way to go, especially with that high uplink oversubscription ratio.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eric
29 days ago
I was thinking the same thing. Marking the UDP traffic with a higher priority class-selector like CS5 or CS6 should give it the needed priority over the lower priority TCP traffic.
upvoted 0 times
Celia
2 days ago
B) edge mark critical UDP Traffic with CSS
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherry
3 days ago
A) edge mark lower priority TCP traffic with AF12
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Son
1 months ago
Option B looks like the correct choice here. Marking the critical UDP traffic with a higher priority class-selector (CS) should help ensure it gets the necessary bandwidth.
upvoted 0 times
Thaddeus
13 days ago
User 3: Definitely, marking it with a higher priority class-selector will help maintain the necessary bandwidth.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amos
15 days ago
User 2: I agree. It's important to ensure that critical UDP traffic doesn't encounter packet drops.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
21 days ago
User 1: I think option B is the way to go. Marking critical UDP traffic with CSS will prioritize it.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Glendora
2 months ago
But wouldn't marking critical UDP traffic with AF42 provide better QoS for our network?
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerald
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe option B to edge mark critical UDP traffic with CSS would be a better choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glendora
2 months ago
I think we should go with option D to edge mark critical UDP traffic with AF42.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel