New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

HPE7-A04 Exam - Topic 4 Question 6 Discussion

Actual exam question for HP's HPE7-A04 exam
Question #: 6
Topic #: 4
[All HPE7-A04 Questions]

In a multi-AS underlay design

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Theron at Oct 22, 2024, 09:03 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium HPE7-A04 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Arlen
3 months ago
Wait, every spine in its own AS? That seems odd!
upvoted 0 times
...
Wenona
3 months ago
D sounds right to me, but I'm not 100% sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Magnolia
3 months ago
C seems too simplistic for a multi-AS design.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dannette
4 months ago
Definitely not B, that doesn't make sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kaitlyn
4 months ago
I think option A is correct.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerardo
4 months ago
I’m leaning towards option A, but I’m a bit confused about how the leaf switches fit into the AS structure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kandis
4 months ago
I feel like I practiced a question similar to this, but I can't recall if every spine should be in its own AS or not.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fernanda
4 months ago
I think option C sounds familiar because it mentions the border leaf being in a separate AS, which we discussed in class.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristel
5 months ago
I remember studying that in a multi-AS setup, spines usually share the same AS, but I'm not sure if that's always the case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynda
5 months ago
I've got a strategy in mind, let's see if I can apply it correctly here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nieves
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the different options, but I'll give it my best shot.
upvoted 0 times
...
Robt
5 months ago
Okay, let me break this down step-by-step to make sure I get the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Staci
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm not too sure about this one. I'll need to think it through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Casie
5 months ago
This question seems straightforward, I think I can handle it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Olive
1 year ago
Option C? Really? That's like saying 'this is a wrong answer' for a multiple-choice question. Come on, these exam writers need to up their game!
upvoted 0 times
Clorinda
1 year ago
D) You must use iBGP for underlay routing within a leaf and spine topology
upvoted 0 times
...
Fallon
1 year ago
B) Either eBGP or iBGP for underlay routing within a leaf and spine topology will work
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorothea
1 year ago
A) You must use eBGP for underlay routing within a leaf and spine topology
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dana
1 year ago
Option B is the way to go. Using eBGP or iBGP gives you flexibility in the underlay design. As long as it works, who cares which one you use, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernardine
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. This question seems a bit tricky. Option A or B could work, depending on the specific requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vernice
1 year ago
I think Option D is correct. iBGP should be used for the underlay routing in a multi-AS environment.
upvoted 0 times
Rex
1 year ago
Yes, eBGP can be used for overlay routing, but iBGP is more suitable for underlay routing in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brett
1 year ago
Using iBGP ensures better control and scalability in a multi-AS underlay network.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arthur
1 year ago
I agree, iBGP is the recommended protocol for underlay routing in a multi-AS design.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenny
1 year ago
I think Option D is correct. iBGP should be used for the underlay routing in a multi-AS environment.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alberta
1 year ago
Option B is the correct answer. Using either eBGP or iBGP for the underlay routing in a leaf and spine topology is a valid design.
upvoted 0 times
Francesco
1 year ago
Exactly, having the option to choose between eBGP and iBGP is beneficial.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mari
1 year ago
That makes sense, it gives flexibility in the design.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corazon
1 year ago
Yes, you can use either eBGP or iBGP for underlay routing in a leaf and spine topology.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elvis
1 year ago
I think option B is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Bettyann
1 year ago
I disagree, iBGP can also work in this design
upvoted 0 times
...
Lisandra
1 year ago
I think we should use eBGP for underlay routing
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel