Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25

- Free Preparation Discussions

HPE7-A04 Exam - Topic 4 Question 6 Discussion

Actual exam question for HP's HPE7-A04 exam

Question #: 6
Topic #: 4

[All HPE7-A04 Questions]

In a multi-AS underlay design

AAll spine switches are in the same AS while each leaf (VSX pair if used) are in their own AS

BEvery spine and every leaf is in their own AS

CAll spine and leaf switches are in one AS and the border leaf is in separate AS

DEvery spine is in their own AS while all leaf switches in one AS

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

by Theron at Oct 22, 2024, 09:03 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium HPE7-A04 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Arlen

6 months ago

Wait, every spine in its own AS? That seems odd!

upvoted 0 times

...

Wenona

7 months ago

D sounds right to me, but I'm not 100% sure.

upvoted 0 times

...

Magnolia

7 months ago

C seems too simplistic for a multi-AS design.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dannette

7 months ago

Definitely not B, that doesn't make sense.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kaitlyn

7 months ago

I think option A is correct.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gerardo

7 months ago

I’m leaning towards option A, but I’m a bit confused about how the leaf switches fit into the AS structure.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kandis

8 months ago

I feel like I practiced a question similar to this, but I can't recall if every spine should be in its own AS or not.

upvoted 0 times

...

Fernanda

8 months ago

I think option C sounds familiar because it mentions the border leaf being in a separate AS, which we discussed in class.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kristel

8 months ago

I remember studying that in a multi-AS setup, spines usually share the same AS, but I'm not sure if that's always the case.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lynda

8 months ago

I've got a strategy in mind, let's see if I can apply it correctly here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nieves

8 months ago

I'm a bit confused by the different options, but I'll give it my best shot.

upvoted 0 times

...

Robt

8 months ago

Okay, let me break this down step-by-step to make sure I get the right answer.

upvoted 0 times

...

Staci

8 months ago

Hmm, I'm not too sure about this one. I'll need to think it through carefully.

upvoted 0 times

...

Casie

8 months ago

This question seems straightforward, I think I can handle it.

upvoted 0 times

...

Olive

2 years ago

Option C? Really? That's like saying 'this is a wrong answer' for a multiple-choice question. Come on, these exam writers need to up their game!

upvoted 0 times

Clorinda

2 years ago

D) You must use iBGP for underlay routing within a leaf and spine topology

upvoted 0 times

...

Fallon

2 years ago

B) Either eBGP or iBGP for underlay routing within a leaf and spine topology will work

upvoted 0 times

...

Dorothea

2 years ago

A) You must use eBGP for underlay routing within a leaf and spine topology

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Dana

2 years ago

Option B is the way to go. Using eBGP or iBGP gives you flexibility in the underlay design. As long as it works, who cares which one you use, right?

upvoted 0 times

...

Bernardine

2 years ago

Hmm, I'm not sure. This question seems a bit tricky. Option A or B could work, depending on the specific requirements.

upvoted 0 times

...

Vernice

2 years ago

I think Option D is correct. iBGP should be used for the underlay routing in a multi-AS environment.

upvoted 0 times

Rex

1 year ago

Yes, eBGP can be used for overlay routing, but iBGP is more suitable for underlay routing in this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Brett

1 year ago

Using iBGP ensures better control and scalability in a multi-AS underlay network.

upvoted 0 times

...

Arthur

1 year ago

I agree, iBGP is the recommended protocol for underlay routing in a multi-AS design.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kenny

2 years ago

I think Option D is correct. iBGP should be used for the underlay routing in a multi-AS environment.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Alberta

2 years ago

Option B is the correct answer. Using either eBGP or iBGP for the underlay routing in a leaf and spine topology is a valid design.

upvoted 0 times

Francesco

2 years ago

Exactly, having the option to choose between eBGP and iBGP is beneficial.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mari

2 years ago

That makes sense, it gives flexibility in the design.

upvoted 0 times

...

Corazon

2 years ago

Yes, you can use either eBGP or iBGP for underlay routing in a leaf and spine topology.

upvoted 0 times

...

Elvis

2 years ago

I think option B is the correct answer.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Bettyann

2 years ago

I disagree, iBGP can also work in this design

upvoted 0 times

...

Lisandra

2 years ago

I think we should use eBGP for underlay routing

upvoted 0 times

...