Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

HPE7-A02 Exam - Topic 17 Question 26 Discussion

What is a use case for the HPE Aruba Networking ClearPass OnGuard dissolvable agent?
B) Implementing a one-time compliance scan
A) Continuously monitoring Windows domain clients for compliance
C) Auto-remediating posture issues on clients
D) Periodically scanning Linux clients for security issues

HPE7-A02 Exam - Topic 17 Question 26 Discussion

Actual exam question for HP's HPE7-A02 exam
Question #: 26
Topic #: 17
[All HPE7-A02 Questions]

What is a use case for the HPE Aruba Networking ClearPass OnGuard dissolvable agent?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

The use case for the HPE Aruba Networking ClearPass OnGuard dissolvable agent is implementing a one-time compliance scan. The dissolvable agent is designed to perform a compliance check without requiring a permanent installation on the client device. This is ideal for environments where a quick, temporary assessment of the device's security posture is needed without the overhead of a persistent agent.

1.Dissolvable Agent: The dissolvable agent is downloaded and executed on the client device for a single session, performing the necessary compliance checks before being removed automatically.

2.One-time Compliance Scan: This method is particularly useful for guest or unmanaged devices where a temporary compliance scan is sufficient to ensure security standards are met.

3.Minimal Impact: Since the agent does not persist on the client device, it minimizes the impact on the user's system and does not require ongoing maintenance or updates.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Shonda
25 minutes ago
I prefer C. Auto-remediation saves time and effort.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cordie
5 days ago
I think A is the best choice. Continuous monitoring is crucial.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joanna
10 days ago
Not sure about D) Periodically scanning Linux clients. Seems a bit off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maynard
16 days ago
Wait, does it really work for Linux clients too?
upvoted 0 times
...
Callie
2 months ago
C) Auto-remediating posture issues on clients is a game changer!
upvoted 0 times
...
Laquanda
2 months ago
I think B) Implementing a one-time compliance scan is more practical.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mable
2 months ago
A) Continuously monitoring Windows domain clients for compliance is a solid use case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephaine
3 months ago
Totally agree with A), compliance is crucial!
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuki
3 months ago
B) is useful for quick checks, but not as effective long-term.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vilma
3 months ago
Wait, does it really support Linux clients? That's surprising!
upvoted 0 times
...
Clement
3 months ago
I think C) is more relevant for auto-remediation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joni
3 months ago
A) is definitely a key use case!
upvoted 0 times
...
Cheryll
3 months ago
I think it’s more about compliance scanning rather than continuous monitoring, so I might lean towards B or C, but I need to double-check.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nguyet
4 months ago
I vaguely recall something about auto-remediation, but I can't remember if that was specifically for ClearPass or another tool.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tambra
4 months ago
I remember practicing a question about compliance monitoring, so I feel like A could be right, but it might also be B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emiko
4 months ago
I think the dissolvable agent is mainly for compliance checks, but I'm not sure if it's continuous or just a one-time scan.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel