Halloween Special 2026! Get Up to 25% OFF Practice Questions! Limited Time - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

HPE7-A01 Exam - Topic 4 Question 20 Discussion

Posted by Linwood on Jun 24, 2024 at 12:45 PM

A customer is looking Tor a wireless authentication solution for all of their loT devices that meet the following requirements

- The wireless traffic between the IoT devices and the Access Points must be encrypted

- Unique passphrase per device

- Use fingerprint information to perform role-based access

Which solutions will address the customer's requirements? (Select two.)

Suggested Answer: C

The reason is that the linkup delay timer is a feature that delays bringing downstream VSX links up, following a VSX device reboot or an ISL flap. The linkup delay timer has two phases: initial synchronization phase and link-up delay phase.

The initial synchronization phase is the download phase where the rebooted node learns all the LACP+MAC+ARP+STP database entries from its VSX peer through ISLP. The initial synchronization timer, which is not configurable, is the required time to download the database information from the peer.

The link-up delay phase is the duration for installing the downloaded entries to the ASIC, establishing router adjacencies with core nodes and learning upstream routes. The link-up delay timer default value is 180 seconds. Depending on the network size, ARP/routing tables size, you might be required to set the timer to a higher value (maximum 600 seconds).

When both VSX devices reboot, the link-up delay timer is not used.

Therefore, by configuring the linkup delay timer to include LAGs 101 and 102, which are part of the same VSX device as LAG 201, you can ensure that both devices have enough time to synchronize their databases and form routing adjacencies before bringing down their downstream links.


Get Premium HPE7-A01 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
32 comments · newest first
KE
Kenneth 11 months ago
EAP-TLS sounds complicated for IoT devices, right?
KA
Kanisha 11 months ago
Wait, unique passphrase per device? That's a lot to manage!
AN
Antonio 11 months ago
Not sure about MPSK Local with MAC Authentication, seems risky.
LA
Launa 12 months ago
I think ClearPass Policy Manager is a solid choice too.
ER
Ernie 12 months ago
MPSK and an internal RADIUS server definitely fit the bill!
CA
Carol 12 months ago
I’m a bit confused about MAC Authentication; I don’t think it provides encryption, which is a key requirement for this scenario.
VE
Vesta 1 year ago
I practiced a similar question about wireless security, and I feel like EAP-TLS could be relevant here, especially for device authentication.
KA
Kattie 1 year ago
I think ClearPass Policy Manager might be a good option because it can manage role-based access, but I can't recall if it meets the encryption requirement.
XO
Xochitl 1 year ago
I remember studying MPSK solutions, but I'm not entirely sure if they can handle unique passphrases for each device.
JO
Joaquin 1 year ago
This is right in my wheelhouse. The combination of MPSK local with EAP-TLS and ClearPass Policy Manager is the way to go here. I'm feeling confident about this one.
FR
Fredric 1 year ago
Whoa, this is a lot to unpack. Encrypted wireless traffic, unique passphrases, and fingerprint access - that's a lot of moving parts. I better read through this a few times.
TA
Tambra 1 year ago
Hmm, the unique passphrase per device and fingerprint-based access control seem like the key things to focus on. I think I have a good handle on this.
CA
Carline 1 year ago
This looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully review the requirements and think through the different options.
KE
Keneth 1 year ago
Okay, I think I've got it. MPSK and ClearPass Policy Manager should cover the encryption and unique passphrase requirements. The fingerprint access can be handled with the role-based policies in ClearPass.
TA
Tamar 1 year ago
I think the packaging design and the brand name are the two most important factors here. Getting the branding and visual identity right will be key to making the new coffee stand out on the shelves.
MA
Markus 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm going to have to say B and E. Local solutions are always the way to go, and who needs RADIUS when you can just make your own rules? *Chuckles*
JO
Jolene 1 year ago
A and D, for sure. You can't go wrong with a good old-fashioned passphrase and fingerprint combo. Keeps the bad guys out and the good guys in. *Winks*
AP
Apolonia 1 year ago
This is a tricky one! I'm going to have to really think it through. Maybe I'll just guess and hope for the best. *Shrugs*
DE
Deangelo 1 year ago
↳ replying to Apolonia
Let's go with A) MPSK and an internal RADIUS server and D) MPSK Local with EAP-TLS to cover all bases.
PE
Pearline 1 year ago
↳ replying to Apolonia
I'm not sure about those options, maybe C) ClearPass Policy Manager could be a better choice.
CL
Cletus 1 year ago
↳ replying to Apolonia
I agree, but I also think D) MPSK Local with EAP-TLS is a good option.
TA
Tamie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Apolonia
I think A) MPSK and an internal RADIUS server could work.
MA
Margarita 1 year ago
I'm not sure what MPSK is, but C looks like it could handle all the requirements. Maybe I should brush up on my wireless authentication knowledge.
ST
Stanton 1 year ago
↳ replying to Margarita
A: It's always good to stay updated on wireless authentication solutions. E: Local User Derivation Rules can also help with role-based access control.
JE
Jettie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Margarita
B: MPSK Local with MAC Authentication could also work for encrypting wireless traffic. D: MPSK Local with EAP-TLS is another option for unique passphrases per device.
AD
Adell 1 year ago
↳ replying to Margarita
A: MPSK stands for Multi-Pre-Shared Key. It's a method for securing wireless networks. C: ClearPass Policy Manager is a good choice for role-based access control.
BA
Basilia 2 years ago
A and D seem like the best options. Unique passphrases and encrypted traffic are covered, and EAP-TLS provides the fingerprint-based access control.
AB
Abel 1 year ago
↳ replying to Basilia
I agree, A and D cover everything the customer needs for their wireless authentication solution.
RA
Rasheeda 1 year ago
↳ replying to Basilia
A and D are definitely the best options. They meet all the requirements.
LO
Louvenia 2 years ago
I'm not sure about ClearPass Policy Manager, it doesn't seem to meet all the requirements. I would go with A and D as well.
JO
Jose 2 years ago
I agree with Jackie, MPSK and an internal RADIUS server, as well as MPSK Local with EAP-TLS, seem like the best solutions.
JA
Jackie 2 years ago
I think options A and D would address the customer's requirements.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel