Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

HPE7-A01 Exam - Topic 4 Question 20 Discussion

Actual exam question for HP's HPE7-A01 exam
Question #: 20
Topic #: 4
[All HPE7-A01 Questions]

A customer is looking Tor a wireless authentication solution for all of their loT devices that meet the following requirements

- The wireless traffic between the IoT devices and the Access Points must be encrypted

- Unique passphrase per device

- Use fingerprint information to perform role-based access

Which solutions will address the customer's requirements? (Select two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

The reason is that the linkup delay timer is a feature that delays bringing downstream VSX links up, following a VSX device reboot or an ISL flap. The linkup delay timer has two phases: initial synchronization phase and link-up delay phase.

The initial synchronization phase is the download phase where the rebooted node learns all the LACP+MAC+ARP+STP database entries from its VSX peer through ISLP. The initial synchronization timer, which is not configurable, is the required time to download the database information from the peer.

The link-up delay phase is the duration for installing the downloaded entries to the ASIC, establishing router adjacencies with core nodes and learning upstream routes. The link-up delay timer default value is 180 seconds. Depending on the network size, ARP/routing tables size, you might be required to set the timer to a higher value (maximum 600 seconds).

When both VSX devices reboot, the link-up delay timer is not used.

Therefore, by configuring the linkup delay timer to include LAGs 101 and 102, which are part of the same VSX device as LAG 201, you can ensure that both devices have enough time to synchronize their databases and form routing adjacencies before bringing down their downstream links.


by Linwood at Jun 24, 2024, 12:45 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium HPE7-A01 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Kenneth
5 months ago
EAP-TLS sounds complicated for IoT devices, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Kanisha
5 months ago
Wait, unique passphrase per device? That's a lot to manage!
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonio
5 months ago
Not sure about MPSK Local with MAC Authentication, seems risky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Launa
5 months ago
I think ClearPass Policy Manager is a solid choice too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ernie
6 months ago
MPSK and an internal RADIUS server definitely fit the bill!
upvoted 0 times
...
Carol
6 months ago
I’m a bit confused about MAC Authentication; I don’t think it provides encryption, which is a key requirement for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vesta
6 months ago
I practiced a similar question about wireless security, and I feel like EAP-TLS could be relevant here, especially for device authentication.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kattie
6 months ago
I think ClearPass Policy Manager might be a good option because it can manage role-based access, but I can't recall if it meets the encryption requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Xochitl
6 months ago
I remember studying MPSK solutions, but I'm not entirely sure if they can handle unique passphrases for each device.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joaquin
6 months ago
This is right in my wheelhouse. The combination of MPSK local with EAP-TLS and ClearPass Policy Manager is the way to go here. I'm feeling confident about this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fredric
6 months ago
Whoa, this is a lot to unpack. Encrypted wireless traffic, unique passphrases, and fingerprint access - that's a lot of moving parts. I better read through this a few times.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tambra
6 months ago
Hmm, the unique passphrase per device and fingerprint-based access control seem like the key things to focus on. I think I have a good handle on this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carline
6 months ago
This looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully review the requirements and think through the different options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keneth
7 months ago
Okay, I think I've got it. MPSK and ClearPass Policy Manager should cover the encryption and unique passphrase requirements. The fingerprint access can be handled with the role-based policies in ClearPass.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamar
7 months ago
I think the packaging design and the brand name are the two most important factors here. Getting the branding and visual identity right will be key to making the new coffee stand out on the shelves.
upvoted 0 times
...
Markus
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm going to have to say B and E. Local solutions are always the way to go, and who needs RADIUS when you can just make your own rules? *Chuckles*
upvoted 0 times
...
Jolene
11 months ago
A and D, for sure. You can't go wrong with a good old-fashioned passphrase and fingerprint combo. Keeps the bad guys out and the good guys in. *Winks*
upvoted 0 times
...
Apolonia
11 months ago
This is a tricky one! I'm going to have to really think it through. Maybe I'll just guess and hope for the best. *Shrugs*
upvoted 0 times
Deangelo
10 months ago
Let's go with A) MPSK and an internal RADIUS server and D) MPSK Local with EAP-TLS to cover all bases.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pearline
10 months ago
I'm not sure about those options, maybe C) ClearPass Policy Manager could be a better choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cletus
10 months ago
I agree, but I also think D) MPSK Local with EAP-TLS is a good option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamie
10 months ago
I think A) MPSK and an internal RADIUS server could work.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Margarita
11 months ago
I'm not sure what MPSK is, but C looks like it could handle all the requirements. Maybe I should brush up on my wireless authentication knowledge.
upvoted 0 times
Stanton
10 months ago
A: It's always good to stay updated on wireless authentication solutions. E: Local User Derivation Rules can also help with role-based access control.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jettie
10 months ago
B: MPSK Local with MAC Authentication could also work for encrypting wireless traffic. D: MPSK Local with EAP-TLS is another option for unique passphrases per device.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adell
10 months ago
A: MPSK stands for Multi-Pre-Shared Key. It's a method for securing wireless networks. C: ClearPass Policy Manager is a good choice for role-based access control.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Basilia
1 year ago
A and D seem like the best options. Unique passphrases and encrypted traffic are covered, and EAP-TLS provides the fingerprint-based access control.
upvoted 0 times
Abel
11 months ago
I agree, A and D cover everything the customer needs for their wireless authentication solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rasheeda
11 months ago
A and D are definitely the best options. They meet all the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Louvenia
1 year ago
I'm not sure about ClearPass Policy Manager, it doesn't seem to meet all the requirements. I would go with A and D as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jose
1 year ago
I agree with Jackie, MPSK and an internal RADIUS server, as well as MPSK Local with EAP-TLS, seem like the best solutions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jackie
1 year ago
I think options A and D would address the customer's requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel