New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

HPE7-A01 Exam - Topic 2 Question 39 Discussion

Actual exam question for HP's HPE7-A01 exam
Question #: 39
Topic #: 2
[All HPE7-A01 Questions]

What are two advantages of splitting a larger OSPF area into a number of smaller areas? (Select two )

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, D

Splitting a larger OSPF area into a number of smaller areas has several advantages for network scalability and performance. Some of these advantages are:

It increases stability by limiting the impact of topology changes within an area. When a link or router fails in an area, only routers within that area need to run the SPF algorithm and update their routing tables. Routers in other areas are not affected by the change and do not need to recalculate their routes.

It reduces processing overhead by reducing the size and frequency of link-state advertisements (LSAs). LSAs are packets that contain information about the network topology and are flooded within an area. By dividing a network into smaller areas, each area has fewer LSAs to generate, store, and process, which saves CPU and memory resources on routers.

It reduces bandwidth consumption by reducing the amount of routing information exchanged between areas. Routers that connect different areas, called area border routers (ABRs), summarize the routing information from one area into a single LSA and advertise it to another area. This reduces the number of LSAs that need to be transmitted across area boundaries and saves network bandwidth.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Leanora
2 months ago
It definitely reduces the total number of LSAs!
upvoted 0 times
...
Billye
2 months ago
I thought it would complicate things more.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marjory
3 months ago
Wait, does splitting really simplify the config?
upvoted 0 times
...
Olive
3 months ago
Totally agree, reduces processing overhead too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherita
3 months ago
It increases stability for sure!
upvoted 0 times
...
Maile
3 months ago
Reducing the total number of LSAs sounds right, but I need to double-check if that’s directly related to splitting areas.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nana
4 months ago
I feel like simplifying configuration might be an option, but I can't recall if that's really a benefit of smaller areas.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sonia
4 months ago
I remember practicing a question like this! I think reducing processing overhead is one of the advantages.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cornell
4 months ago
I think splitting areas can definitely increase stability, but I'm not sure about the LSDB part.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nickie
4 months ago
Reducing processing overhead and simplifying the configuration seem like the key advantages here. Splitting areas can help manage the complexity of large OSPF networks, which is important for maintaining reliable connectivity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Evan
4 months ago
Okay, let's think this through step-by-step. Splitting a larger OSPF area into smaller areas should reduce the size of the LSDB, simplify the configuration, and improve overall network stability. I'll make sure to select the two most relevant options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mary
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused on this one. I know OSPF areas have something to do with network topology, but I'm not sure about the specific advantages of splitting them. I'll have to review my notes carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gussie
5 months ago
This is a straightforward OSPF question. I'll focus on the key advantages of splitting a larger area into smaller areas, like reducing processing overhead and increasing stability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Halina
10 months ago
Yes, that's true. It simplifies the configuration as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Florinda
10 months ago
But doesn't it also simplify the configuration?
upvoted 0 times
...
Val
11 months ago
Hah, these options are like a networking buffet. I'll take a slice of A and D - less is more when it comes to OSPF areas!
upvoted 0 times
Bobbie
9 months ago
User1: Exactly, less is more when it comes to OSPF areas.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bettyann
9 months ago
User3: It also reduces processing overhead, which is always a plus.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alida
9 months ago
User2: Splitting into smaller areas does simplify things.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kathrine
9 months ago
User1: I agree, A and D are definitely the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hollis
9 months ago
Definitely, it simplifies things and makes it more efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annita
9 months ago
I agree, less is more when it comes to OSPF areas!
upvoted 0 times
...
Patria
10 months ago
D) It reduces processing overhead
upvoted 0 times
...
Mattie
10 months ago
A) It extends the LSDB
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Elenor
11 months ago
Hmm, I think C and E are the way to go. Simplifying configuration and reducing LSAs? Sounds like a win-win to me!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lindsey
11 months ago
I agree, it also reduces processing overhead.
upvoted 0 times
...
Samira
11 months ago
I'd go with B and D. Increased stability and decreased processing overhead - that's the dream team right there.
upvoted 0 times
Lauryn
10 months ago
It simplifies the configuration too, so it's a triple win with B and D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenneth
10 months ago
Yeah, having increased stability and reduced processing overhead is a win-win situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emilio
10 months ago
I agree, B and D are definitely the way to go for splitting OSPF areas.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Halina
11 months ago
I think splitting OSPF areas increases stability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arminda
11 months ago
A and D for sure! Splitting areas reduces the LSDB and processing overhead. Gotta love that simplified configuration too!
upvoted 0 times
Dorcas
10 months ago
A and D for sure! Splitting areas reduces the LSDB and processing overhead. Gotta love that simplified configuration too!
upvoted 0 times
...
Caitlin
11 months ago
D) It reduces processing overhead
upvoted 0 times
...
Flo
11 months ago
A) It extends the LSDB
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel