Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

HP Exam HPE7-A01 Topic 2 Question 39 Discussion

Actual exam question for HP's HPE7-A01 exam
Question #: 39
Topic #: 2
[All HPE7-A01 Questions]

What are two advantages of splitting a larger OSPF area into a number of smaller areas? (Select two )

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, D

Splitting a larger OSPF area into a number of smaller areas has several advantages for network scalability and performance. Some of these advantages are:

It increases stability by limiting the impact of topology changes within an area. When a link or router fails in an area, only routers within that area need to run the SPF algorithm and update their routing tables. Routers in other areas are not affected by the change and do not need to recalculate their routes.

It reduces processing overhead by reducing the size and frequency of link-state advertisements (LSAs). LSAs are packets that contain information about the network topology and are flooded within an area. By dividing a network into smaller areas, each area has fewer LSAs to generate, store, and process, which saves CPU and memory resources on routers.

It reduces bandwidth consumption by reducing the amount of routing information exchanged between areas. Routers that connect different areas, called area border routers (ABRs), summarize the routing information from one area into a single LSA and advertise it to another area. This reduces the number of LSAs that need to be transmitted across area boundaries and saves network bandwidth.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Halina
2 months ago
Yes, that's true. It simplifies the configuration as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Florinda
2 months ago
But doesn't it also simplify the configuration?
upvoted 0 times
...
Val
2 months ago
Hah, these options are like a networking buffet. I'll take a slice of A and D - less is more when it comes to OSPF areas!
upvoted 0 times
Bobbie
3 days ago
User1: Exactly, less is more when it comes to OSPF areas.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bettyann
4 days ago
User3: It also reduces processing overhead, which is always a plus.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alida
6 days ago
User2: Splitting into smaller areas does simplify things.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kathrine
10 days ago
User1: I agree, A and D are definitely the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hollis
16 days ago
Definitely, it simplifies things and makes it more efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annita
22 days ago
I agree, less is more when it comes to OSPF areas!
upvoted 0 times
...
Patria
27 days ago
D) It reduces processing overhead
upvoted 0 times
...
Mattie
28 days ago
A) It extends the LSDB
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Elenor
2 months ago
Hmm, I think C and E are the way to go. Simplifying configuration and reducing LSAs? Sounds like a win-win to me!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lindsey
2 months ago
I agree, it also reduces processing overhead.
upvoted 0 times
...
Samira
2 months ago
I'd go with B and D. Increased stability and decreased processing overhead - that's the dream team right there.
upvoted 0 times
Lauryn
29 days ago
It simplifies the configuration too, so it's a triple win with B and D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenneth
1 months ago
Yeah, having increased stability and reduced processing overhead is a win-win situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emilio
1 months ago
I agree, B and D are definitely the way to go for splitting OSPF areas.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Halina
2 months ago
I think splitting OSPF areas increases stability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arminda
2 months ago
A and D for sure! Splitting areas reduces the LSDB and processing overhead. Gotta love that simplified configuration too!
upvoted 0 times
Dorcas
1 months ago
A and D for sure! Splitting areas reduces the LSDB and processing overhead. Gotta love that simplified configuration too!
upvoted 0 times
...
Caitlin
2 months ago
D) It reduces processing overhead
upvoted 0 times
...
Flo
2 months ago
A) It extends the LSDB
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
a