Halloween Special 2026! Get Up to 25% OFF Practice Questions! Limited Time - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

HPE7-A01 Exam - Topic 2 Question 39 Discussion

Posted by Coral on Mar 19, 2025 at 07:27 PM

What are two advantages of splitting a larger OSPF area into a number of smaller areas? (Select two )

Suggested Answer: B, D

Splitting a larger OSPF area into a number of smaller areas has several advantages for network scalability and performance. Some of these advantages are:

It increases stability by limiting the impact of topology changes within an area. When a link or router fails in an area, only routers within that area need to run the SPF algorithm and update their routing tables. Routers in other areas are not affected by the change and do not need to recalculate their routes.

It reduces processing overhead by reducing the size and frequency of link-state advertisements (LSAs). LSAs are packets that contain information about the network topology and are flooded within an area. By dividing a network into smaller areas, each area has fewer LSAs to generate, store, and process, which saves CPU and memory resources on routers.

It reduces bandwidth consumption by reducing the amount of routing information exchanged between areas. Routers that connect different areas, called area border routers (ABRs), summarize the routing information from one area into a single LSA and advertise it to another area. This reduces the number of LSAs that need to be transmitted across area boundaries and saves network bandwidth.


Get Premium HPE7-A01 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
35 comments · newest first
LE
Leanora 10 months ago
It definitely reduces the total number of LSAs!
BI
Billye 10 months ago
I thought it would complicate things more.
MA
Marjory 11 months ago
Wait, does splitting really simplify the config?
OL
Olive 11 months ago
Totally agree, reduces processing overhead too.
SH
Sherita 11 months ago
It increases stability for sure!
MA
Maile 11 months ago
Reducing the total number of LSAs sounds right, but I need to double-check if that’s directly related to splitting areas.
NA
Nana 12 months ago
I feel like simplifying configuration might be an option, but I can't recall if that's really a benefit of smaller areas.
SO
Sonia 12 months ago
I remember practicing a question like this! I think reducing processing overhead is one of the advantages.
CO
Cornell 12 months ago
I think splitting areas can definitely increase stability, but I'm not sure about the LSDB part.
NI
Nickie 1 year ago
Reducing processing overhead and simplifying the configuration seem like the key advantages here. Splitting areas can help manage the complexity of large OSPF networks, which is important for maintaining reliable connectivity.
EV
Evan 1 year ago
Okay, let's think this through step-by-step. Splitting a larger OSPF area into smaller areas should reduce the size of the LSDB, simplify the configuration, and improve overall network stability. I'll make sure to select the two most relevant options.
MA
Mary 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused on this one. I know OSPF areas have something to do with network topology, but I'm not sure about the specific advantages of splitting them. I'll have to review my notes carefully.
GU
Gussie 1 year ago
This is a straightforward OSPF question. I'll focus on the key advantages of splitting a larger area into smaller areas, like reducing processing overhead and increasing stability.
HA
Halina 2 years ago
Yes, that's true. It simplifies the configuration as well.
FL
Florinda 2 years ago
But doesn't it also simplify the configuration?
VA
Val 2 years ago
Hah, these options are like a networking buffet. I'll take a slice of A and D - less is more when it comes to OSPF areas!
BO
Bobbie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Val
User1: Exactly, less is more when it comes to OSPF areas.
BE
Bettyann 1 year ago
↳ replying to Val
User3: It also reduces processing overhead, which is always a plus.
AL
Alida 1 year ago
↳ replying to Val
User2: Splitting into smaller areas does simplify things.
KA
Kathrine 1 year ago
↳ replying to Val
User1: I agree, A and D are definitely the way to go.
HO
Hollis 1 year ago
↳ replying to Val
Definitely, it simplifies things and makes it more efficient.
AN
Annita 1 year ago
↳ replying to Val
I agree, less is more when it comes to OSPF areas!
PA
Patria 1 year ago
↳ replying to Val
D) It reduces processing overhead
MA
Mattie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Val
A) It extends the LSDB
EL
Elenor 2 years ago
Hmm, I think C and E are the way to go. Simplifying configuration and reducing LSAs? Sounds like a win-win to me!
LI
Lindsey 2 years ago
I agree, it also reduces processing overhead.
SA
Samira 2 years ago
I'd go with B and D. Increased stability and decreased processing overhead - that's the dream team right there.
LA
Lauryn 1 year ago
↳ replying to Samira
It simplifies the configuration too, so it's a triple win with B and D.
KE
Kenneth 1 year ago
↳ replying to Samira
Yeah, having increased stability and reduced processing overhead is a win-win situation.
EM
Emilio 2 years ago
↳ replying to Samira
I agree, B and D are definitely the way to go for splitting OSPF areas.
HA
Halina 2 years ago
I think splitting OSPF areas increases stability.
AR
Arminda 2 years ago
A and D for sure! Splitting areas reduces the LSDB and processing overhead. Gotta love that simplified configuration too!
DO
Dorcas 2 years ago
↳ replying to Arminda
A and D for sure! Splitting areas reduces the LSDB and processing overhead. Gotta love that simplified configuration too!
CA
Caitlin 2 years ago
↳ replying to Arminda
D) It reduces processing overhead
FL
Flo 2 years ago
↳ replying to Arminda
A) It extends the LSDB
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel