New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Hitachi Vantara HQT-4180 Exam - Topic 5 Question 35 Discussion

Actual exam question for Hitachi Vantara's HQT-4180 exam
Question #: 35
Topic #: 5
[All HQT-4180 Questions]

One Unix server and one Windows server share the front-end ports CL1-A and CL2-A of a VSP E590 system.

What are two requirements to separate the I/Os of the servers? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, B

by Paulina at Jul 03, 2024, 06:01 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium HQT-4180 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Alline
3 months ago
Not sure about port security being necessary, though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitsue
3 months ago
Definitely need those cache partitions too!
upvoted 0 times
...
Zita
3 months ago
Wait, do we really need the Universal Volume Manager license?
upvoted 0 times
...
Myrtie
4 months ago
I agree, that's a must!
upvoted 0 times
...
Heike
4 months ago
Both servers need to be in different Host Groups for sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dan
4 months ago
Creating cache partitions sounds familiar, but I can't recall if it's a requirement for this scenario or just a best practice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shaquana
4 months ago
I'm a bit confused; I thought the Universal Volume Manager license was necessary for something else, not specifically for separating I/Os.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kallie
4 months ago
I remember practicing a question similar to this, and I feel like enabling port security was mentioned as important for separating I/Os.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elden
5 months ago
I think both servers need to be in different Host Groups, but I'm not entirely sure about the second requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Caitlin
5 months ago
The Universal Volume Manager license doesn't seem relevant to this specific task of separating the I/Os. I'm going to rule that one out and focus on the other options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paris
5 months ago
I'm pretty confident the correct answers are A and B. Registering the servers in different Host Groups and enabling port security should do the trick to keep their I/Os separate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erasmo
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused about the cache partitions option. Does that really have to do with separating the I/Os? I'm not sure that's the right approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eliseo
5 months ago
Okay, let's see. Both servers need to be in different Host Groups, and port security needs to be enabled. Those seem like the two main requirements here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Makeda
5 months ago
Hmm, this seems straightforward. I think the key is separating the I/Os of the servers, so I'll focus on the options that address that directly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Oretha
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The options cover a lot of different concepts related to DBMS. I'll need to carefully read through each one to determine which four advantages are the most accurate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Detra
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused by this question. Some of these options don't seem like typical SQL keywords, but I want to make sure I don't miss anything. I'll have to double-check my knowledge.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jamey
5 months ago
Hmm, this looks tricky. I'll need to carefully analyze the class and main method to figure out how to set the balance to 0.
upvoted 0 times
...
Blair
2 years ago
B and C, easy peasy. Port security and licenses, that's the way to go. Unless, of course, you're secretly a vampire and the Universal Volume Manager license is actually a wooden stake.
upvoted 0 times
Brendan
2 years ago
D) Two cache partitions must be created on the VSP for the servers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Katina
2 years ago
C) The Universal Volume Manager license must be installed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catarina
2 years ago
B) Port security must be enabled on both ports.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kris
2 years ago
A) Both servers must be registered in two different Host Groups.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ronald
2 years ago
Hmm, I think I'll go with A and D. Wouldn't want my servers to get all mixed up, now would I?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jules
2 years ago
C, the Universal Volume Manager license? What is this, a trick question?
upvoted 0 times
Mitzie
1 year ago
C, the Universal Volume Manager license? What is this, a trick question?
upvoted 0 times
...
Chauncey
1 year ago
B) Port security must be enabled on both ports.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dylan
2 years ago
A) Both servers must be registered in two different Host Groups.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernadine
2 years ago
B) Port security must be enabled on both ports.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rolande
2 years ago
A) Both servers must be registered in two different Host Groups.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Chandra
2 years ago
I believe option B is also necessary. Port security must be enabled on both ports to ensure separation of I/Os.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raina
2 years ago
I agree with Geraldo. Option A makes sense to separate the I/Os of the servers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Geraldo
2 years ago
I think option A is correct. Both servers must be registered in two different Host Groups.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chandra
2 years ago
D? Really? Creating cache partitions? That's a bit overkill, don't you think?
upvoted 0 times
Veronika
2 years ago
B) Port security must be enabled on both ports.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmela
2 years ago
A) Both servers must be registered in two different Host Groups.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lashon
2 years ago
A and B seem like the obvious choices here. Gotta separate those servers and secure those ports, you know?
upvoted 0 times
Francesco
2 years ago
B) Port security must be enabled on both ports.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vanda
2 years ago
A) Both servers must be registered in two different Host Groups.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel