New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Hitachi Vantara HQT-4180 Exam - Topic 3 Question 3 Discussion

Actual exam question for Hitachi Vantara's HQT-4180 exam
Question #: 3
Topic #: 3
[All HQT-4180 Questions]

Your customer wants to connect multiple servers to a new port on a VSP G700. The correct topology has already been set for the port.

What should you do next?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Jordan
4 months ago
Not sure about that, seems like overkill to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annice
4 months ago
Wait, do we really need to scan for WWNs?
upvoted 0 times
...
Vanesa
4 months ago
Definitely create a Host Group!
upvoted 0 times
...
Earlean
4 months ago
I think enabling Port Security is a better first step.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carisa
4 months ago
You need to create a Host Group first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerardo
5 months ago
I feel like enabling Host Group security could be the right move, but I also wonder if we should focus on creating the Host Group first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Harley
5 months ago
I recall something about scanning for WWNs, but I can't remember if that's the first step or if it comes later.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emiko
5 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but enabling Port Security sounds familiar. I remember it being important for securing connections.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pok
5 months ago
I think we might need to create a Host Group first, right? That seems to be a common step in similar questions we've practiced.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vince
5 months ago
I'm pretty confident the answer is C. Receive tasks are used to wait for a message, not to initiate a new process instance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glen
5 months ago
I've got a good feeling about this one. The quality manager should be a senior IT manager to have the most impact.
upvoted 0 times
...
Moira
5 months ago
I'm a little confused by the wording of this question. Can optimistic concurrency really prevent two processes from selecting the same record for update at the same time? I'll need to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel