Hitachi Vantara HCE-5920 Exam - Topic 2 Question 33 Discussion

Actual exam question for Hitachi Vantara's HCE-5920 exam

Question #: 33
Topic #: 2

You have multiple transformations that read and process data from multiple text files. You identity a series of steps that are common across transformations and you want to re-use them to avoid duplication of code.

How do you accomplish this?

AUse the 'Mapping (sub-transformation)' step containing the series of steps.

BUse the ETL Metadata Infection' stop containing the series of steps.

CUse the 'Get data from XML' step to read the series of steps

DUse the 'Job Executor1 step containing the series of steps

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

by Jutta at Dec 10, 2023, 11:45 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium HCE-5920 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Apolonia

3 months ago

I thought D was the right choice, but now I'm confused.

upvoted 0 times

...

Roslyn

3 months ago

A is the way to go, no doubt about it!

upvoted 0 times

...

Brandon

3 months ago

Wait, can you really use option C for this? Seems off.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kanisha

4 months ago

I think B sounds interesting, but I'm not sure it fits here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ruby

4 months ago

Definitely go with option A, it's the best way to reuse steps!

upvoted 0 times

...

Leonor

4 months ago

I vaguely recall something about the Job Executor step, but I can't remember if it was for reusing code or something else. It feels a bit off to me.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shizue

4 months ago

I think we practiced a similar question where we had to reuse steps, and I chose a mapping step then too. That makes me lean towards A again.

upvoted 0 times

...

Stefany

4 months ago

I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like the ETL Metadata Infection step was mentioned in a different context. It doesn't seem to fit here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Temeka

5 months ago

I remember we talked about using sub-transformations to avoid code duplication, so I think option A might be the right choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ilene

5 months ago

The 'Job Executor1' step doesn't ring a bell for me. I'll have to do some research on that one to see if it could be a viable solution.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ronny

5 months ago

Using the 'Get data from XML' step doesn't seem relevant to this problem. I think that's more for reading data from XML sources, not reusing common processing steps.

upvoted 0 times

...

Junita

5 months ago

The 'ETL Metadata Infection' step sounds interesting, but I'm not sure if that's the right approach here. I'll need to double-check the details on that one.

upvoted 0 times

...

Arlie

5 months ago

This looks like a common problem in data processing. I think the 'Mapping (sub-transformation)' step would be the best way to reuse the common series of steps across multiple transformations.

upvoted 0 times

...

Paris

5 months ago

Hmm, I'm not too familiar with the 'Mapping (sub-transformation)' step. I'll have to look into that option more closely. Hopefully, the exam provides some examples or guidance on how to use it.

upvoted 0 times

...

Curt

5 months ago

Okay, I think the Platform Administration Guide is the best bet here. That guide would likely include information on the platform architecture and recommendations. I'll go with that choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Madelyn

5 months ago

I'm pretty sure the correct answer is B - a member of staff losing a laptop. That's a clear security incident that could lead to a data breach or other security problems. The other options don't seem to be directly related to security.

upvoted 0 times

...

Laticia

9 months ago

Mapping step all the way! It's the only option that makes sense. The other choices are like trying to put a square peg in a round hole.

upvoted 0 times

...

An

9 months ago

Job Executor1? Sounds like something out of a sci-fi movie. I'll pass on that and choose the Mapping step instead.

upvoted 0 times

Cassi

8 months ago

The Mapping step seems like the most efficient way to handle common steps across transformations.

upvoted 0 times

...

Olene

8 months ago

Job Executor1 does sound like something from a sci-fi movie, I'll stick with the Mapping step.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shala

8 months ago

I think using the Mapping step is a more practical approach for avoiding code duplication.

upvoted 0 times

...

Terry

8 months ago

I agree, the Mapping step is a better choice for re-using common steps.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mickie

10 months ago

Get data from XML? Seriously? This is a text file processing question, not an XML one. I'm going with the Mapping step.

upvoted 0 times

...

Melvin

10 months ago

ETL Metadata Infection? What is that, some kind of disease? I'll stick with the Mapping step, thank you very much.

upvoted 0 times

Melvin

8 months ago

User 3: I agree, the Mapping step is the way to go for re-using common steps.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rosio

8 months ago

User 2: Rosio: I'll stick with the Mapping step, thank you very much.

upvoted 0 times

...

Elina

9 months ago

ETL Metadata Infection does sound like a disease, Mapping step is much clearer.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dominque

9 months ago

User 1: ETL Metadata Infection? What is that, some kind of disease?

upvoted 0 times

...

Dominic

9 months ago

I agree, it's the best option to avoid duplication of code.

upvoted 0 times

...

Audry

9 months ago

Mapping (sub-transformation) step is the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

...

Martha

10 months ago

The 'Mapping (sub-transformation)' step is the way to go. It's a great way to encapsulate common functionality and reuse it across multiple transformations.

upvoted 0 times