Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Hitachi Vantara Exam HCE-5920 Topic 2 Question 33 Discussion

Actual exam question for Hitachi Vantara's HCE-5920 exam
Question #: 33
Topic #: 2
[All HCE-5920 Questions]

You have multiple transformations that read and process data from multiple text files. You identity a series of steps that are common across transformations and you want to re-use them to avoid duplication of code.

How do you accomplish this?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Jutta at Dec 10, 2023, 11:45 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium HCE-5920 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Laticia
3 months ago
Mapping step all the way! It's the only option that makes sense. The other choices are like trying to put a square peg in a round hole.
upvoted 0 times
...
An
3 months ago
Job Executor1? Sounds like something out of a sci-fi movie. I'll pass on that and choose the Mapping step instead.
upvoted 0 times
Cassi
29 days ago
The Mapping step seems like the most efficient way to handle common steps across transformations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Olene
1 months ago
Job Executor1 does sound like something from a sci-fi movie, I'll stick with the Mapping step.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shala
1 months ago
I think using the Mapping step is a more practical approach for avoiding code duplication.
upvoted 0 times
...
Terry
1 months ago
I agree, the Mapping step is a better choice for re-using common steps.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mickie
3 months ago
Get data from XML? Seriously? This is a text file processing question, not an XML one. I'm going with the Mapping step.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melvin
3 months ago
ETL Metadata Infection? What is that, some kind of disease? I'll stick with the Mapping step, thank you very much.
upvoted 0 times
Melvin
2 months ago
User 3: I agree, the Mapping step is the way to go for re-using common steps.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosio
2 months ago
User 2: Rosio: I'll stick with the Mapping step, thank you very much.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elina
2 months ago
ETL Metadata Infection does sound like a disease, Mapping step is much clearer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominque
2 months ago
User 1: ETL Metadata Infection? What is that, some kind of disease?
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominic
3 months ago
I agree, it's the best option to avoid duplication of code.
upvoted 0 times
...
Audry
3 months ago
Mapping (sub-transformation) step is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Martha
4 months ago
The 'Mapping (sub-transformation)' step is the way to go. It's a great way to encapsulate common functionality and reuse it across multiple transformations.
upvoted 0 times
Lizbeth
2 months ago
That's a good point. It definitely helps with code reusability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristin
3 months ago
A) Use the 'Mapping (sub-transformation)' step containing the series of steps.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gracia
3 months ago
That's a good point. It helps keep things organized and saves time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorean
3 months ago
A) Use the 'Mapping (sub-transformation)' step containing the series of steps.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Merilyn
4 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think option B) could also work. Using ETL Metadata Injection might be a good solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mozelle
4 months ago
I agree with Rebecka. Option A) seems like the most efficient way to re-use common steps.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rebecka
4 months ago
I think option A) is the best choice. Using a sub-transformation can help avoid code duplication.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel